Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011431
Original file (20120011431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  8 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120011431 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) be corrected to show in block 38 that the highest grade held was that of a second lieutenant (2LT).  

2.  The applicant states that he went to officer candidate school (OCS) and performed according to all rules and regulations.  He further states that he followed orders and never questioned the Army way of doing things.

3.  The applicant provides a one-page statement in support of his application and an article from Wikipedia regarding the town of Berga, Thuringia. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  

3.  The applicant was inducted on 25 June 1943 and entered active duty at Fort Snelling, Minnesota on 9 July 1943.  He completed his training as a clerk typist and departed for the European Theater of Operations (ETO) on 6 December 1944.  He was captured by German Forces and interned as a prisoner of war from 9 January to 13 April 1945.  He departed the ETO on 14 May 1945 and on  6 September 1945 he was honorably discharged at Fort Logan, Colorado in the rank of corporal with a Certificate of Disability for Discharge.  He had served       2 years, 1 month, and 27 days of active service 

4.  The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows in block 38 that the highest grade he held was “Corporal.”  Block 41 shows that he completed a pre-cadet course at the State College of Washington.  However, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was ever commissioned as a second lieutenant.  

5.  A Joint Resolution, Public Law 77-252, dated 25 September 1941, provided that, “during the present emergency, temporary appointments as officers of the Army of the United States (AUS) could be made without appointing such persons as officers in any particular component of the AUS.”  It further provided that such appointments could be vacated at any time by the President and, if not sooner vacated, would continue “during the present emergency and 6 months thereafter.”

6.  The editions of Army Regulation 605-10, and changes thereto in effect between 1941 and 1949, implemented Public Law 77-752.  The period of an appointment as a commissioned officer without component was specified as the duration of the present emergency and 6 months thereafter, unless sooner terminated.  Provisions were made for termination of such an appointment at the discretion of the President.  In addition, it was stipulated that, during the present emergency and such further period as the Secretary of War may prescribe, former enlisted men who were discharged to enter on active commissioned service, and who presented themselves for enlistment upon the honorable termination of their officer status, would be entitled to restoration to the enlisted grade held immediately preceding their commissioned service.
  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant is commended for his excellent record of service to his country, the available evidence of record fails to show that he was ever recommended for or was commissioned as a second lieutenant.  Accordingly, in the absence of evidence to show that he was ever commissioned or served as a second lieutenant, it must be presumed that what the Army did in his case was correct.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there appears to be no error or injustice in this case and no basis for granting the applicant's request

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during World War II.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011431





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011431



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067576C070402

    Original file (2002067576C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant was ever recommended for a battlefield commission. While the Board commends the applicant for his excellent record of service to his country, the available evidence of record fails to show that he was ever recommended for or received a battlefield commission.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069431C070402

    Original file (2002069431C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. However, there is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to support his contentions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071817C070403

    Original file (2002071817C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he and another staff sergeant were told that they were being recommended for a battlefield commission to the rank of second lieutenant, immediately after being awarded Silver Stars for gallantry in action in France in July 1944. A search of records of the 32 nd Armored Regiment, 3 rd Armored Division during the period in question failed to reveal any evidence to support the applicant’s claim that he was recommended for a battlefield commission. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004527

    Original file (20130004527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests, in effect, correction of the applicant's discharge documents to reflect: * Addition of the "Central Europe Campaign Award" (European-African-Middle Eastern Theater Campaign Ribbon with five bronze service stars) * battlefield promotion to second lieutenant 2. Counsel requests correction of the applicant's record to show he received a battlefield promotion to second lieutenant and was awarded the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with five bronze service stars....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060675C070421

    Original file (2001060675C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. When a commander of United States forces outside the continental United States was granted special authority by the War Department to appoint or to recommend the appointment of officers, the qualifications for appointment would be as indicated in the special War Department instructions authorizing the appointments. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007445

    Original file (20080007445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is insufficient evidence in the available records to show that the FSM was promoted to the rank of 1st Lieutenant prior to his separation from active duty. The FSM's records are unavailable for review, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to show that the FSM was considered or recommended for promotion to 1st Lieutenant prior to his separation from active duty. The FSM's narrative efficiency rating is not available and all available records show he was separated from active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009295

    Original file (20080009295.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show his Prisoner of War (POW) status. He also states that in 1973 all of his military records were lost in a fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, Missouri, and in 1979, he requested that his military records be reconstructed to show he was a POW. A Request for Service Data (GSA Form 6917), dated 30 April 1979, shows the NPRC General Counsel confirmed that the applicant was a POW for 57 days;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103278C070208

    Original file (2004103278C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he received a battlefield commission. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 January 1950.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002595C070206

    Original file (20050002595C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation), Honorable Discharge Certificate, and Certification of Military Service to show his service as second lieutenant. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. His WD AGO Form 53-55 also shows that he was discharged in the enlisted grade of PFC, that the highest grade he held was PFC during the period 27 June 1943 to 25 June 1945, and that he was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008367

    Original file (20100008367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is insufficient evidence in the form of an official order, a recommendation for promotion or appointment, or other documentary evidence that shows he served in a higher grade. His reconstructed records show he held the rank of Pvt for a period of 4 months during basic training as well as during the remainder of his military service. The Board found that the additional supporting statement provided by the applicant was sufficient to show that he was, at the least, recommended for...