IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 4 January 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011321
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he should have received two Purple Hearts from mortar, scrap metal, and from small arms hostile fire. He describes events that occurred in April 1967 in which he received wounds when a mortar round landed close to him causing him to lose consciousness. When he came to he had four small wounds, two in his forehead, one on the left side of his nose, and one on the right side of his head.
3. The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 23 June 1966. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13A (Field Artillery Basic).
3. He served in the Republic of Vietnam with B Battery, 1st Battalion, 8th Artillery from 12 December 1966 to 4 December 1967.
4. On 21 June 1968, he was released from active duty. He completed 1 year,
11 months, and 29 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.
5. Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank.
6. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show any awards of the Purple Heart.
7. His service medical records were not available for review. His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty listing.
8. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.
9. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), chapter 9, of the version in effect at the time, stated that a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment that were received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization, would be entered in item 40 of the DA Form 20.
10. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services had been wounded, killed, or who had died as a result of a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Not more than one award will be made for more than one would or injury received at the same instant or from the same missile, force, explosion, or agent. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Item 40 of his DA Form 20 contains no entries and his name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing.
2. Although he states he should have been awarded two Purple Hearts, he only describes one event involving a mortar round. Therefore, more than one Purple Heart would not have been awarded as a result of multiple wounds received as a result of the same mortar round. The veracity of his recollections is not in question. However, there is no official documentation to corroborate his statement.
3. Therefore, in the absence of evidence showing he was wounded as result of hostile action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment was made a matter of official record there is an insufficient basis to award the Purple Heart in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.
The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
_______ _ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011321
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011321
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021323
The applicant provides: a. An email, dated 23 January 2012, from a Verizon email user who states he was the unit medic at the time in question and that he treated the applicant for a small concussion at Vinh Kim after a mortar round knocked him off his feet in February 1969. c. A statement, dated 12 January 2012, from a radio telephone operator who served in the same unit at the time. Therefore, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007048
His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Although contemporaneous medical evidence (his SF 88, dated 22 May 1969) states he had mixed hearing loss and he was exposed to explosions in Vietnam, it does not mention any injuries or wounds...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023026
c. A statement from a former unit member who states the company was ambushed on 17 July 1967 by small arms fire and mortar rounds and that they took some casualties at the time. d. A statement from a friend who served in Vietnam at the time and who also supports awarding the applicant the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity and/or those of the authors, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020
The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000829
He has the piece of shrapnel that was taken from his arm while at the hospital. There is no medical evidence in his available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action while in an active duty status. He provides a statement of support wherein one individual stated the applicant was wounded in the arm and had not shot himself.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016215
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). c. A statement, dated 22 January 2010, from a retired SFC and comrade who served with the applicant in Vietnam and has known him over the years. In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019888
There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. (4) Thus, the evidence the applicant provides is not only inconsistent with respect to the date of injury, but is also insufficient to support a claim to the Purple Heart. d. There is no evidence in the applicant's available military service records to satisfy the strict requirements for award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016304
He and his buddy jumped out of the helicopter before they landed and they were under fire as soon as they hit the ground. The hand-written diary the applicant submitted contains entries from May 1966 to 9 July (1967). There is no evidence to show this is shrapnel or that he received it as a result of enemy action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003437
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for an injury he received in the line of duty in 1967. His service record does not contain orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart and the Vietnam Casualty Roster does not list his name. His retirement DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020637
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. His record is void of any medical records to show he was wounded as a result of...