Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011253
Original file (20120011253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  4 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120011253 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to the Post-9/11 GI Bill that will allow him to transfer his education benefits to his family members.

2.  The applicant states that he was not made aware by his unit that he had to transfer his benefits before he retired.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his 20-year letter, his retirement orders, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), and a copy of his daughter’s application for use of transferred of education benefits and a copy of his daughter’s birth certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Mississippi Army National Guard (MSARNG) on 14 October 1981 and served through a series of continuous reenlistments until he was honorably discharged on 9 June 2002.

2.  On 24 July 2002, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and on 14 July 2005 he was issued his 20-year letter.  He continued to serve until he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 20 June 2010 in the pay grade of E-7.

3.  In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Human Resources Command (HRC) at Fort Knox, Kentucky.  The advisory official opines that the applicant is not entitled to relief because the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program is based on legal authority outlined in law and information on the program was publicized well in advance of the implementation date of 1 August 2009.  Individuals had to be serving in an active status at the time benefits were transferred and there is no record of such a transfer being made, of his attempting to make such a transfer, or being  given false information by a reliable source about the rules of transferring education benefits.  

4.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and responded to the effect that he was never informed that he had to be in an active status at the time of transfer and contends that his 27 years of service warrants approval of his request.

5.  Public Law 110-252, section 3319, dated 22 June 2008, authorized the transfer of unused education benefits to family members.  The law provided that the Secretary of Defense would prescribe the implementation of the program.  It also provided that eligible participants must be serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.

6.  On 22 June 2009, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense released Directive-Type Memorandum 09-003 – Post-9/11 GI Bill that announced that individuals serving in the Armed Forces could effect a transfer of the GI Bill benefits effective 1 August 2009.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted.  However, according to the applicable law and regulation, he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program.  He was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 20 June 2010 and there is no record of his transferring his educational benefits prior to his retirement.  Unfortunately, there are no provisions in the law for retroactive eligibility that will allow him to transfer his benefits to his family members.

2.  Additionally, the Departments of the Army, Defense, and Veterans Affairs initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  Information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of entitlements was published well in advance of its implementation.

3.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was not informed that he had to be on active duty to complete a transfer of his benefits prior to retiring is not in question, the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record fails to support his claim.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ___X_____  _X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011253





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011253



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016518

    Original file (20110016518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the Army Education Incentives Branch denied his request to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his daughter on 4 August 2011 because Department of Defense and Army policies require a Soldier to be on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve in order to transfer benefits. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service; and d. for those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001229

    Original file (20110001229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied to transfer his education benefits to his dependent daughter under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program. The available evidence shows he was fully eligible for transfer of his education benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, but he contends he was not aware he needed to be on active duty to transfer the benefits to his dependents. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002186

    Original file (20140002186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show his education benefits were transferred to his eligible dependent in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active service or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014424

    Original file (20140014424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 May 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140014424 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests to transfer education benefits to his daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007920

    Original file (20110007920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserves at the time of transfer of education benefits to his or her dependent (on or after 1 August 2009). The applicant in this case had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement, so he was eligible to transfer to either his spouse or children (if he completed the request before leaving military service). He was also eligible to transfer his education benefits to his dependent(s) under the TEB prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011060

    Original file (20120011060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to her daughter. The evidence of record shows the applicant retired from active duty on 31 October 2009 which is within 90 days of the implementation of the program. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing she filed her application and the Army approved her request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008413

    Original file (20120008413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer benefits to eligible children. The applicant had more than 25 years of service upon her retirement, so she was eligible to transfer benefits to either her spouse or children if she had completed the request before leaving military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013386

    Original file (20130013386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Soldier must also have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer education benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children. On 22 June 2009, the DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. There is insufficient evidence that shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer his education benefits to his family member(s) while on active duty, attempted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000399

    Original file (20130000399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to transfer her educational benefits to her daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will placed on the Retired List on 1 August 2009. In the applicant's case, she was not in an active status on 1 August 2009 and as such she was not eligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000935

    Original file (20120000935.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's last active duty date was 31 August 2009 which was within 90 days after the program's implementation. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental...