Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011251
Original file (20120011251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  4 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120011251 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states:

* He should have been awarded the Purple Heart
* On his third tour in Vietnam he was involved in an explosion while he was stationed on the fire base
* He was injured (shrapnel in his right thigh and lower back)
* He was also deafened by the explosion
* He was evacuated from Vietnam to Fort Gordon, GA
* He is service connected for hearing loss/tinnitus from the explosion 

3.  The applicant provides:

* Letter, dated 10 September 1973, from the Veterans Administration (VA)
* DA Form 3349 (Medical Condition – Physical Profile Record)
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) 
* DD Forms  214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 18 May 1967 and 1 April 1971

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  However, this case is being considered using reconstructed records which primarily consists of the records provided by the applicant.

3.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 18 May 1967 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 May 1966 for a period of 4 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 12B (combat engineer).  On 
18 May 1967, he was honorably discharged for immediate reenlistment.

4.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 18 May 1967 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

5.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 April 1971 shows he reenlisted on 19 May 1967 for a period of 4 years.  His DA Form 20 shows he served as a combat engineer in Vietnam from August 1967 to March 1969.  His DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam from 11 August 1970 to 26 March 1971.  On 1 April 1971, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation. 

6.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 April 1971 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.  This DD Form 214 shows he was separated from the service on temporary records and a Soldier's affidavit.

7.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records. 

8.  Item 20 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 is blank.

9.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.




10.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for award of the Purple Heart.

11.  He provided a DA Form 3349, dated 11 September 1970, which shows he was issued a temporary "3" profile for loss of hearing.  

12.  He also provided a letter, dated 10 September 1973, from the VA which shows he was granted service connection for defective hearing, bilateral.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should have been awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 establishes basic requirements for the Purple Heart and all other awards.  The Purple Heart requires:

* a wound the result of hostile action
* treatment of the wound by military medical personnel
* documentation of the wound in official records

3.  There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.    

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011251





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011251



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080017432

    Original file (AR20080017432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's military personnel records contain a copy of his DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty this period on 13 February 1964. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in item 40 or list the Purple Heart in item 41; his DA Form 2-1 does...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020032

    Original file (20100020032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect a combat wound or injury and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant's finger injury resulted from an unfortunate accident. Additionally, his record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000700C070208

    Original file (20040000700C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Injuries or wounds which clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart include accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any to show that he was wounded as a result of hostile action. Since there is insufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, he is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023725

    Original file (20100023725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served as a combat engineer and he was honorably discharged on 24 March 1978 based on his conscientious objector status. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence to support award of any Purple Hearts in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012737

    Original file (20080012737.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a two-page self authored letter; two eyewitness statements; a Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination); discharge orders; a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 26 November 1967; a DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 November 1973; two physician's statements; a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) report; and a Department of Veterans Affairs service connected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014610

    Original file (20110014610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he served on active duty in the U.S. Army from 3 April 1969 through 2 April 1971 * on 2 February 1970, he incurred and was later diagnosed with residual shell fragment wound, left leg, left foot, left side, and right thigh * his wounds were the result of a fragmentation hand grenade exploding also injuring another Soldier * he received medical treatment at the local medical hospital and he was presented the Purple Heart by a captain assigned to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006755

    Original file (20130006755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was never awarded the Purple Heart for wounds he received on 27 July 1971 while in combat in the Republic of Vietnam while serving with Company C, 2nd Battalion, 506th Infantry. The statements from his former company commander and a former member of his unit are consistent in the description of the applicant being wounded by flying debris to his face and body when SFC S________ stepped on an explosive device (booby trap). The statements from his former company...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002398C070206

    Original file (20050002398C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was wounded a second time as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action on any date other than 11 August 1971 in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 11 August 1971...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017779

    Original file (20140017779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, he participated in five campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to a silver service star to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 ending on 20 July 1974 to show this service star. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022224

    Original file (20100022224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * excerpts from the 533rd Ordnance Detachment EOD activities for the period 1 July - 31 December 1970 * clinical records, dated 13 July 1970 and 26 July 1970 * a Patient Admission Form * his DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He was assigned to the 25th Ordnance Detachment in Vietnam from 1 May 1970 until he was wounded on 12 July 1970 and he was transferred to the United States on 23 July 1970 for further medical treatment. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military...