Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010974
Original file (20120010974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  3 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010974 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show two awards of the Army Achievement Medal.

2.  He states:

* the awards were issued after his discharge date
* neither is listed on his DD Form 214
* he has not received the medals

3.  He provides his:

* DD Form 214
* DA Form 4980-18 (Army Achievement Medal Certificate), dated 30 May 1986

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 
Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 


justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 May 1983.

3.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record, Part II) does not show any awards of the Army Achievement Medal.

4.  A review of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), failed to reveal orders awarding him any Army Achievement Medals.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 15 April 1986 under the early release program.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation.  He completed 2 years, 10 months, and 16 days of creditable active service.  The
DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show any awards of the Army Achievement Medal.

6.  He submitted a DA Form 4980-18, issued by 1st Battalion, 321st Field Artillery Regiment, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), dated 30 May 1986, that indicates he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal with first oak leaf cluster for exceptionally meritorious service from 5 April 1985 to 15 April 1986.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record is void of orders showing the applicant was awarded any awards of the Army Achievement Medal.

2.  The governing Army regulation states that formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required for personal decorations (which include the AAM).  Regrettably, his record does not contain any orders and the applicant did not provide such orders awarding him any Army Achievement Medals.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  _____x___  __x_  ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________x________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010974



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010974



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015142

    Original file (20090015142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an additional award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and two additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Evidence of record contains orders that support two awards of the AAM. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show he was awarded a third award of the AAM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019770

    Original file (20080019770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal. However, the Army Achievement Medal certificate alone is insufficient evidence to support correction of the applicant's records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011730

    Original file (20110011730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides the following documents: a. a DA Form 4980-18 (Army Achievement Medal Certificate), dated 17 July 1989, that shows Lieutenant Colonel James L. H----, Commander, 1st Battalion, 41st Infantry, awarded the applicant the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious achievement from 30 March through 9 May 1989; and b. a DA Form 4980-14 (Army Commendation Medal Certificate), dated 19 June 1990, that shows Colonel Stanley F. C----, Commander, 41st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001184

    Original file (20120001184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and Army Achievement Medal (AAM) * he served with the 82d Airborne Division 2. The evidence of record is void of orders showing the applicant was awarded the ARCOM or AAM. However, the evidence clearly shows his last duty assignment was with Company A, 2d Battalion, 87th Infantry Regiment, 8th Infantry Division and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013626

    Original file (20110013626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form also shows in: a. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that the applicant's record be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019453

    Original file (20110019453.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019453 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant received award of the Army Commendation Medal and later received the Bronze Star Medal for the same act, achievement, and period of meritorious service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing DA Form 4980-14 Permanent Orders Number 076-039,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015330

    Original file (20130015330.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The applicant provides a copy of a DA Form 4980-12 (Certificate for Award of the MSM), dated 19 June 1992. A DA Form 4980-12, as provided by the applicant, indicates that Permanent Orders Number 69-04, National Training Center, announced award of the MSM to the applicant for meritorious...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015394

    Original file (20090015394.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show five awards of the Army Achievement Medal and two awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal because he received the awards, but they were not entered on his discharge document. The evidence of record shows that permanent orders awarded the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 2 November 1982 to 1 November 1985. a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003730

    Original file (20110003730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (4th Award) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). He states orders for the AAM (4th Award) and ARCOM were never placed in his DA Form 201 (Military Personnel Records Jacket). Army regulations provide that the AAM and ARCOM will be announced in orders; therefore, the AAM and ARCOM certificates alone are insufficient evidence for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019189

    Original file (20080019189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records showing he was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. However, there are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.