Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010752
Original file (20120010752.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010752 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Presidential Unit Citation and any/all other medals he may have earned.

2.  The applicant states his unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for heroism from 18 to 26 May 1967.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* General Orders Number 69, dated 7 November 1969
* Citation for award of the Presidential Unit Citation

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 December 1965 and he held military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  

3.  He served in Vietnam from on or about 12 September 1966 to 7 September 1967.  He was assigned to Company C, 3rd Battalion, 12th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division.  

4.  General Orders (GO) Number 3423 issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, on 16 October 1967 awarded him the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service in Vietnam from September 1966 to September 1967.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 10 September 1967.  He completed 1 year, 9 months, and 4 days of creditable active service with no lost time.  His DD Form 214 further shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* Combat Infantryman Badge

6.  A review of his service record shows no derogatory information that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Furthermore, item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

8.  Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his tenure with the 3rd Battalion, 12th Infantry this unit was cited for award of the:
* Presidential Unit Citation, for valor from 18 to 26 May 1967, based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 69, dated 1969
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service from 1 October 1966 to 28 July 1969, based on DAGO Number 3, dated 1970
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Citation for service from 1 October 1966 to 31 October 1969, based on DAGO Number 53, dated 1970

9.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows during his service in the Republic of Vietnam campaign participation credit was awarded for the below campaigns.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase, 1 July 1966 - 31 May 1967
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, 1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  GO awarded him the Army Commendation Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show it.

2.  GO awarded his unit the Presidential Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, neither of which is shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards.

3.  The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.  Additionally, records show he participated in two campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show two bronze service stars to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal.

4.  He served honorably from 7 December 1965 through 10 September 1967.  He completed a combat tour in Vietnam, attained the rank/grade of SGT/E-5, received multiple awards, and received "excellent" efficiency and conduct ratings throughout his military service.  His records contain no derogatory information that would have disqualified him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal and correct his DD Form 214 to show this medal.


BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 7 December 1965 through 10 September 1967
* adding to his DD Form 214 the:

* Army Commendation Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal
* Presidential Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal with First Class Unit Citation



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010752





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010752



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017386

    Original file (20110017386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 17 January 1966 through 9 January 1968 and b. adding the following awards to item 24 of his DD Form 214: * Purple Heart * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005245

    Original file (20090005245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. The applicant’s service records show he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service and was promoted to specialist five during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019525

    Original file (20110019525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 7 June 1963 and 13 September 1968 * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center * Citation for award of the Bronze Star Medal * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DA Form 24 (Service Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Deleting from his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000553

    Original file (20110000553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards): a. states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that at the time of his assignment to HHC, 3rd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division, this unit was cited for award of the: * Presidential Unit Citation for the period 21 March 1967 by Department of the Army (DAGO) Number 59,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008922

    Original file (20090008922.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Based on the criteria contained in Army Regulation 672-5-1 in effect at the time, the applicant is qualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and his records should be corrected accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019281

    Original file (20100019281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the: * Parachutist Badge * Vietnam Service Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Vietnam Campaign Medal 8. The applicant's records do not show indiscipline or lost time, he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service, and he was promoted to SGT/E-5 in less than 2 years. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022877

    Original file (20120022877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records that show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal; however, neither is there evidence of a commander's disqualification for the award. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 23 November 1965-3 September 1967 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006094

    Original file (20080006094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with “V” device and the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 8 September 1966 through 27 July 1968; and b. amending his DD Form 214 to add the Bronze Star Medal with “V” device, the Army Commendation Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005912

    Original file (20140005912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * authorization for issuance of awards, dated 29 November 1984 * citations for award of the Presidential Unit Award and Valorous Unit Award CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001225

    Original file (20100001225.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and two awards of the Presidential Unit Citation. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 13...