Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010648
Original file (20120010648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:  13 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010648 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect,  correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as private/E-2 (PV2) instead of private/E-1 (PV1).

2.  The applicant states he was promoted while in the reserves from 1992-1999.

3.  The applicant did not provide any additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 August 1991.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).
3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows his grade as PV1 effective 13 August 1991.

4.  On 16 January 1992, the applicant was released from active duty (REFRAD) because he did not meet procurement medical fitness standards with no disability.  He had completed 5 months and 4 days of net active service.  His DD Form 214 shows his rank and pay grade as PV1/E-1.

5.  There is no available evidence to show he was promoted to PV2/E-2 prior to his release from active duty.

6.  Headquarters, 88th Regional Support Command Orders 96B-086-04, dated 26 March 1996, show he was released from the 411th Quartermaster Company, Scottsburg, Indiana, effective 15 April 1996, and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) (Annual Training).  These orders show his rank as PV2.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military (emphasis added) service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  For item 5b (Pay Grade), enter the pay grade in which serving at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no available evidence he was promoted to PV2 prior to his REFRAD on 16 January 1992.  In his application he states he was promoted while in the reserves from 1992-1999.  

2.  Therefore, there is no basis for correction of the applicant's DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020523



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010648



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021885

    Original file (20100021885.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * Items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) to show his rank/grade as private (PV2)/E-2 * Item 12f (Foreign Service) to show his service in Southwest Asia 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. Additionally, most personnel documents in his service records show he served as a PVT or PV1/E-1 throughout his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013342

    Original file (20140013342.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests correction of item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that he held the rank/pay grade of private (PV2)/E-2 with an effective date of 26 September 1991 at the time of discharge. On 25 May 1993, the applicant was notified by his unit commander that separation action was being initiated against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059840C070421

    Original file (2001059840C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of private/E-2 (PV2) upon his entry on initial active duty for training (IADT) and that he receive all back pay and allowances due as a result. The applicant failed to attend advanced individual training which ultimately resulted in his being discharged from the USAR on 1 February 1999, with an uncharacterized discharge. By regulation, members of the DEP/DTP are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020366

    Original file (20120020366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * page 1 of a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 19 November 1988 * a Western Union Mailgram from the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), St. Louis, MO, dated 21 January 1991 * a U.S. Army Individual Ready Reserve recognition certificate in support of Operation Desert Storm * his U.S. Army Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 5 February 1991 * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 February 1991 * a DARP Form 249-2-E (Chronological...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024898

    Original file (20110024898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to this acknowledgement, the applicant’s immediate commander recommended the applicant be discharged with a General Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), in effect at the time, provided for promotion of Soldiers in the IRR. There is no evidence of record and he provides none to show he held a higher rank/grade between the date his suspended reduction was vacated and the date of his REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012396

    Original file (20090012396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty (emphasis added) to include attendance at basic combat and advanced training and will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. The evidence of record shows that at the time of her release from active duty on 24 October 1990, the applicant held the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008018

    Original file (20080008018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows, in Item 33 (Promotions and Reductions) that he was promoted to PFC on 13 September 1966, and that this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence submitted by the applicant that shows he was promoted to SP4 by proper authority while serving on active duty, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000605

    Original file (20130000605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his pay grade as E-4 and award of the Safe Driver Medal. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was awarded the Safe Driver Medal. Therefore, the applicant could not have been awarded said medal during his active duty service and it is not authorized for entry on the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017286

    Original file (20090017286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge was separation with honor. The evidence shows that the applicant requested to be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, because court-martial charges preferred against him which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge. His military records contain no evidence which would entitle him to an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011933

    Original file (20140011933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as private first class (PFC)/E-3. There is no evidence in his military records and he provided no evidence that indicates he was promoted to PV2 or PFC during his period of IADT.