IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 11 December 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120010126
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions.
2. The applicant states he was not in the right state of mind due to feeling overwhelmed and depressed because he did not have enough money to help his family. He states he is trying to get his life back together and set an example for his family.
3. He provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and two statements of support.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. His military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 July 2001. He was awarded the military occupational specialty of 11B (Infantryman). The highest rank/grade he held was private/E-2.
3. On 17 September 2003, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for:
* being absent without leave (AWOL) from on or about 10 October 2001 until on or about 12 March 2002 when he was apprehended by civilian authorities and returned to military control
* being AWOL from on or about 26 May 2002 until on or about 4 August 2003 when he was apprehended by civilian authorities and returned to military control
4. He consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel).
a. He acknowledged he was making the request of his own free will and had not been subjected to coercion with respect to his request for discharge. He acknowledged he had been advised of the implications attached to his request. He acknowledged he understood the elements of the offenses(s) charged and was guilty of the charge(s) against him or of a lesser-included offense(s) which also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He acknowledged he understood if his discharge request were approved he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions. He acknowledged he had been advised and understood the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge and as a result of the issuance of such a discharge he would be deprived of many or all Army benefits, he may be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and he may be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws. He further understood there is no automatic upgrading or automatic review of a less than honorable discharge by any government agency or the ABCMR.
b. He waived his rights and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
5. On 24 October 2003, his request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial was approved by the appropriate authority.
6. On 5 November 2003, he was discharged accordingly. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 8 months and 5 days of creditable active service with a total of 591 days of lost time.
7. On 8 May 2007, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request to upgrade his discharge under other than honorable conditions.
8. He submits two statements of support indicating he is making improvements in his life.
9. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
a. Chapter 10 states a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request could be submitted at any time after charges had been preferred and must have included the individual's admission of guilt. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally considered appropriate.
b. An honorable discharge was a separation with honor and entitled the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization was appropriate when the quality of the members service generally met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or was otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization was clearly inappropriate.
c. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. He admitted guilt to the charge of being AWOL for 588 days. The fact that two of his periods of AWOL were terminated by apprehension by civilian authorities raises doubt as to his intention to return to military control of his own accord.
2. This serious misconduct warranted his discharge under other than honorable conditions. Both his character of service and the reason for his discharge were appropriate considering the facts of the case. He was properly and equitably discharged. The records contain no indication of procedural or other errors that would have jeopardized his rights.
3. He voluntarily requested discharge to avoid trial by court-martial. His DD Form 214 correctly shows he was separated in lieu of trial by court-martial.
4. His statement and the statements of others that he is trying to get his life back together and set an example for his family is encouraging. However, this is not a basis for changing a properly-issued discharge.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient basis upon which to upgrade his discharge to a general discharge or honorable discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ____X____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ __X_____ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120010126
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120010126
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021983
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge and correction of the narrative reason for his separation. On 21 May 2003, the applicant was accordingly discharged. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by a court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010013
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 November 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070010013 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him, or of a lesser included offense, that also authorized the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020913
The applicant provides a request for discharge for the good of the service dated 31 January 1979, an Absent Without Leave (AWOL) Deserter Verification Sheet, and a DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). On 31 January 1979, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the Service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. He acknowledged he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012462
The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 10 June 1997. In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him, or of a lesser included offense, that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a discharge under other honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his discharge shows he was discharged for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004892
On 27 August 2002, a licensed clinical social worker in the state of Georgia stated, in effect, that he consulted with the applicant. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Therefore, the evidence of record and the applicant's supporting evidence show no reason or justification as to justify correction of a military record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000920
The applicant requests her discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. In view of the above, there is insufficient substantive evidence on which to base an upgrade of her under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014349
He acknowledged he understood that, if his request for discharge was accepted, he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Discharge Certificate. The applicant's commander stated the applicant had surrendered to military authorities; however, in view of his personal conduct, his attitude toward military life, and his lack of rehabilitative potential, he recommended the applicant's request for discharge under the provision of Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008605
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) to a general discharge (GD). On 29 January 1988, the separation authority approved the applicant's request and directed his discharge UOTHC. _________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010106
During this interview, the applicant stated his AWOL was due to family issues. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009068
Following a period of honorable active service in the Army of the United States, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 November 1969. On 17 March 1976, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. In his request for discharge he indicated: * he was making this request of his own free will and he had not been...