Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009971
Original file (20120009971.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    4 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009971 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 29 (Other Service Training Courses Successfully Completed) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Electronic Counter-Measures and Electronic Counter Counter-Measures courses, he took at The Signal School, Fort Monmouth, NJ, from February to March 1963.

2.  The applicant states he completed these courses and they should be recognized. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 July 1960 and he held military occupational specialty 299.10 (Radar Repairman).  

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 27 June 1963 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 17 days of net active service.

4.  Item 28 (Service Schools or Colleges, College Training Courses and/or Post-Graduate Courses Successfully Completed) of the DD Form 214 he was issued contains the following entries:

* The Signal School, Fort Monmouth, NJ; October 1960 - January 1961; Nuclear Weapons Maintenance
* The Signal School, Fort Monmouth, NJ; January 1961 - July 1961; Radar Repair
* The Signal School, Fort Bliss, TX; October 1961 - May 1962; AN/GSG 5 & 6 Birdie

5.  Item 29 of this DD Form 214 contains the entry "None."

6.  Item 26 (Military Education) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the three courses that are listed in item 28 of his DD Form 214.  It does not list any additional military education.

7.  Item 33 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he was assigned as a radar repairman to the 65th Signal Detachment, Fairchild Air Force Base, WA, from 31 January to 27 June 1963.

8.  His record is void of any certificates or other documentation that shows he attended and/or successfully completed either the Electronic Counter-Measures or the Electronic Counter Counter-Measures courses.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time stated, in item 28 enter the enter service schools, including dates and major courses which were successfully completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214.  All entries on the DD Form 214 were required to be verified against source documents for completeness and accuracy.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence or record does not contain any evidence and the applicant has not provided any evidence that shows he successfully completed either the Electronic Counter-Measures or the Electronic Counter Counter-Measures courses during his military service.  Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of documentation that shows he successfully completed these courses and the dates of his attendance, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009971





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009971



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020326

    Original file (20130020326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not list his completion of 21 weeks of the Wire Electronic Repairman Course and does not show his temporary appointment to the rank of CPL. He has no evidence and the Army has all the records. The applicant’s complete military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014205

    Original file (20080014205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show his dates of service in Vietnam. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in Vietnam. Since there is no provision to show service in Vietnam on the DD Form 214, and there is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in Vietnam, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to show he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021416

    Original file (20100021416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 3288, Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam, dated 24 November 1971, awarded him the BSM for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force, in the Republic of Vietnam, during the period November 1970 to November 1971. This document shows the unit to which he was assigned was cited for the following unit citations: a. Meritorious Unit Commendation, for the period 1 August 1968 to 30 April 1972, by Department of the Army General...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017324

    Original file (20070017324.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also states, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. Evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted for, trained in, and was awarded MOS 26W. Therefore, the entry in Item 23a of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 9 September 1969, is correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015055

    Original file (20060015055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his undesirable discharge, under other than honorable conditions, should be upgraded to a general discharge, under honorable conditions, because the U.S. Army cancelled its contract with him to attend the crypto-electronics course at the U.S. Army Electronics School. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was advised that his discharge under conditions other than honorable would automatically be changed to a general discharge under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059194C070421

    Original file (2001059194C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that item 28 (Service Schools or Colleges, College Training Courses and/or Post-Graduate Courses Successfully Completed) should be corrected to show that he completed the Signal Analysis Course, Class 4-62 and 3 semester hours in German, item 29 (Other Service Training Course Successfully Completed) to show that he completed the Projectionist Training Course, item 25a (Specialty Number and Title) to show his Secondary Specialty Number as “059.14 Telephone Intercept...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014842

    Original file (20130014842.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Camp Stoneman, CA, and served with the 6214th Army Support Unit (ASU) from 1 September 1949 to 19 September 1949. c. Guam, Army Post Office Number 246 from 19 September 1949 to 24 September 1951 and served with: * Marianas Bonins (MARBO) Personnel from 19 September 1949 to 2 October 1949 * Company A, 516th Signal Service Battalion from 7 October 1949 to 27 December 1949 * Company B, 516th Signal Service Battalion from 27 December 1949 to 26 January 1950 * 529th Signal Operations Company from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009202

    Original file (20110009202.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar (M-1), to correct his weight shown on this form, and to show he attended the Intercept Equipment Repairman course at Fort Meade, MD, from November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009777

    Original file (20070009777.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his separation shows he completed 3 years, 9 months, and 25 days of creditable military service during this period; b. reenlisted on 11 March 1959 for 6 years and was honorably discharged on 1 October 1963 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 6 years and 6 months of creditable military service during this period. Evidence of record shows that the applicant's computation of active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016509

    Original file (20080016509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 March 1962, the applicant’s immediate commander recommended the applicant be administratively separated from military service under the provisions of paragraph 20a of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations – Discharge – Misconduct (Fraudulent Entry, Conviction by Civil Court, AWOL, Desertion)) for misconduct. It states, in pertinent part, that item 24(1) (Statement of Service – Net Service this Period) shows the total service completed between the dates shown in item 19c (Date...