IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 17 January 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120009800
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general discharge (GD).
2. The applicant states he was informed by the officer representing him during his trial, and prior to signing a plea agreement, that he would be eligible for school and housing benefits. He contributed to the Veterans Educational Assistance Program and was approved for a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) home loan. He received an enlistment bonus for a 4-year enlistment. He contends it has been hard for him to obtain employment and medical assistance. He was proud to enlist in the U.S. Army and he regrets not spending his entire life in the military. It was the best thing that ever happened to him.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 June 1985. After completing the training requirements he was awarded military occupational specialty 13F (Fire Support Specialist).
3. Headquarters, 7th Infantry Division (Light), Fort Ord, CA, issued Special Court-Martial Order Number 41, dated 31 May 1988, showing he was found guilty of one specification of wrongfully distributing hashish on 1 September 1987. He pled not guilty to two additional specifications of the same offense and those charges were dismissed. He was sentenced to confinement for 4 months, a forfeiture of $447.00 pay for 4 months, reduction to the lowest enlisted grade (private/E-1), and a BCD. Only so much of the sentence as provided for confinement for 45 days, a forfeiture of $447.00 pay for 2 months, reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, and a BCD was approved, and except for that portion extending to the BCD was executed.
4. His record contains the following documents issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Control Facility (USAPCF), U.S. Army Armor Center, Fort Knox, KY:
a. A memorandum, dated 28 August 1988, showing he was absent without leave (AWOL) from 15 July 1988 through 28 August 1988.
b. Orders Number 164-11, dated 6 September 1988, which assigned him to the USAPCF effective 29 August 1988. The additional instructions show he surrendered to military authorities on the above effective date.
c. A DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave), dated 29 August 1988, which placed him in an indefinite excess leave status pending appellate review of his sentence to a BCD.
d. Special Court-Martial Orders Number 36, dated 23 February 1989, which affirmed his sentence and ordered his BCD to be executed.
5. On 23 March 1989, he was discharged as directed.
6. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
a. Chapter 3 provides that a Soldier will be given a punitive discharge (dishonorable or BCD) pursuant only to an approved sentence to a general court-martial or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
b. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a GD is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
7. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for an upgrade of his BCD.
2. The ABCMR does not grant requests for upgrade of discharges solely for the purpose of making the applicant eligible for VA benefits.
3. In May 1988, he was convicted of one specification of wrongful distribution of hashish. Further, the evidence shows that after serving his confinement and while pending an appellate review of his sentence he went AWOL for 44 days.
4. Although he states he did not understand the ramifications of pleading guilty to the charges and specifications, the record does not show, nor has the applicant provided evidence showing, that he was not properly informed his conviction would make him ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the VA.
5. Absent evidence to the contrary, his conviction and sentence by special court-martial were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
6. Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law. The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed. Absent any mitigating factors, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate. As a result, clemency is not warranted in this case.
7. In view of the foregoing, his request should be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120009800
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120009800
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001006
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024271
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Only after all required post-trial and appellate reviews were completed did the convening authority order the applicant's bad conduct discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002715
The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005704
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States) in support of his application. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015077
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. The evidence of record shows that in addition to the SPCM conviction that resulted in the applicant's BCD, he also had an extensive disciplinary record that included his acceptance of NJP on three...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009141
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general or an honorable discharge. Accordingly, on 24 February 1992, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3 as a result of a duly reviewed and affirmed general court-martial conviction. Title 10, United Stated Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006601
While the applicant contends that he was a good Soldier, the evidence of record clearly shows he repeatedly accepted NJP under Article 15 of the UCMJ for multiple offenses, and that he had a bar to reenlistment imposed on him. After a review of the available records, the Board found no cause for clemency and an insufficient basis upon which to base an upgrade of the applicants bad conduct discharge to an honorable or general discharge. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021189
BOARD DATE: 27 June 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021189 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 18 February 1983, the applicant was dishonorably discharged from the Army. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012897
The convening authority approved the sentence and the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and the sentence on 26 October 1990. The available records show the applicant was more than 24 years of old at the time of his enlistment and 27 years old at the time of discharge. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025339
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains a DD Form 214 for the period 21 November 1985 through 1 August 1988. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.