Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009764
Original file (20120009764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    3 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009764 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reinstatement in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and referral to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB)/Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) based on an injury that existed prior to service and determined to be in the line of duty.

2.  The applicant states he was not given the opportunity to be processed through the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) for the purpose of establishing the proper basis for his separation.

	a.  He states he had a pre-existing medical condition prior to entering military service.  The condition is known as Cervicalgia (neck pain) that is due to a fusion of the C-4/C-5 vertebrae and causes intermittent pain.

	b.  During his over 15 years of military service the injury worsened.  Several line of duty investigations were conducted and his injury was determined to be in the line of duty.

	c.  On 14 November 2002, he was issued a temporary "3" profile (upper extremities) for an acute neck injury and declared medically disqualified.  He was discharged on 15 April 2005 and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) without referral to the PDES for evaluation by an MEB/PEB.

	d.  He resigned from Federal employment in 2005 for medical reasons.  He is now unemployed and not able to work due to intermittent pain.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a line of duty investigation with allied documents and his separation orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR as a cadet in the Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) on 26 January 1983.

3.  He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank/grade of second lieutenant (2LT)/O-1 (Infantry Corps) on 12 May 1984.

4.  Four Standard Forms (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) pertaining to the applicant:

* 11 June 1983 for entry in the ROTC
* 2 August 1984 for entry on active duty for training (ADT)
* 4 December 1984 for separation from ADT
* 25 February 1990 for a routine check-up

all show in:

	a.  The Clinical Evaluation section:

* item 35 (Upper Extremities) - Normal
* item 38 (Spine, Other Musculoskeletal) - Normal

	b.  the examining physician found the applicant medically qualified under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness).


5.  A DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 1 October 2002, 
shows in:

	a.  The Clinical Evaluation section:

* item 33 (Upper extremities) - Normal 
* item 36 (Spine, other musculoskeletal) - Normal

	b.  item 44 (Notes):  "33 - Full strength - both uppers";

	c.  item 77 (Summary of Defects and Diagnoses):  "36 - Chronic neck pain - No upper extremity motor loss"; and

	d.  item 74a (Examinee/Applicant) shows the examining physician found the applicant qualified for service.

6.  Orders 05-070-00005, issued by Headquarters, 99th Regional Readiness Command, Coraopolis, PA, dated 11 March 2005, reassigned the applicant to the USAR (Retired Reserve) effective 15 April 2005.  The orders show the reason was "Medically Disqualified - Not Result of Own Misconduct" and the authority was Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers).

7.  An ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) shows the applicant served in the USAR from 12 May 1984 through 15 April 2005 and that he had 16 years of qualifying service for retirement.  It also shows he had non-qualifying years, as follows:

* 12 May 1990 through 11 May 1991 - 34 total points
* 12 May 1991 through 11 May 1992 - 28 total points
* 12 May 1995 through 11 May 1996 - 29 total points
* 12 May 2004 through 15 April 2005 - 14 total points

8.  A memorandum issued by the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, MO, subject:  Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Selected Reserve 15-Year Letter)), dated 3 July 2007, shows the applicant was notified that he was eligible to apply for retired pay upon attaining age 60 under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1273b – Physical disability not incurred in the line of duty.  It also states, "Your eligibility was determined based on the following qualifications:

	a.  You are not eligible for retention in the Selected Reserve.


	b.  You have completed at least 15 years of qualifying service.

	c.  You have completed the last 8 years of qualifying service while a member of a Reserve component.

	d.  You have requested transfer to the Retired Reserve (emphasis added).

9.  In support of his application the applicant provides:

	a.  Order Number 016319, issued by the 99th Regional Support Command, Coraopolis, PA, dated 15 January 2002, that ordered him to annual training for a period of 17 duty days effective 15 February 2002.

	b.  A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 11 June 2002, that shows the applicant was treated as an out-patient at Darnall Army Community Hospital, Fort Hood, TX, on 19 February 2002 for Cervicalgia (neck pain) that existed prior to service.  It also shows in:

* item 11 (Medical Opinion) the attending physician indicated the injury:

* is not likely to result in a claim against the government for future medical care
* was not incurred in the line of duty - "Existed prior to service condition"
* was based on "Review of SF 600 and patient interview"

* item 12 (The Following Disability May Result):  an "x" in the "Temporary" block
* item 15 (Details of Accident or History of Disease):  "Soldier on duty at this installation sustained a neck injury in 1974 [sic] and now has intermittent pain.  No recent trauma.  Treatment rendered on post/on duty, Fort Hood."  An SF 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 19 February 2002, documents the medical treatment

		(1)  The commander indicated the injury is considered to have been incurred in the line of duty and he signed the document.

		(2)  On 14 August 2002, the Deputy Adjutant General, Headquarters,
III Corps, Fort Hood, reviewed the line of duty investigation for completeness and determined the applicant's medical condition was in the line of duty.


	c.  Medical treatment records that document the applicant's treatment, that include:

* four SF's 600, dated 12 February, 8 November, and 3 and 7 December 1984, for various medical conditions (not related to neck injury/pain)
* three SF's 558 (Emergency Care and Treatment Record), dated
17 August 1984, 11 October 1984, and 2 August 1986, for right shoulder, right knee, and right eye swelling, respectively
* an SF 519-A (Radiographic Report), dated 8 November 1984, for right knee injury

	d.  The reverse side of a DA Form 7349 (Initial Medical Review - Annual Medical Certificate), dated 8 November 2002, that shows the applicant reinjured his neck on 14 October 2002, he was hospitalized for 1 day, and he required further evaluation.  On 10 November 2002, the examining physician indicated the applicant was medically unfit.

	e.  A DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 14 November 2002, that shows the applicant was issued a temporary physical profile for an acute neck injury (Upper Extremities - "T3") and that the profile expired on 31 December 2002.

10.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, set forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures in determining whether a Soldier was unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.  In each case, it is necessary to compare the nature and degree of physical disability present with the requirements of the duties the Soldier reasonably may be expected to perform because of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.  Separation by reason of disability requires processing through the PDES.

	a.  Chapter 3 (Policies), paragraph 3-4 (LOD Decisions), provides that under the laws governing the Army PDES, Soldiers who sustain or aggravate physically unfitting disabilities must meet the following LOD criteria to be eligible to receive retirement and severance pay benefits.

		(1)  The disability must have been incurred or aggravated while the Soldier was entitled to basic pay or as the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty training (emphasis added).

		(2)  The disability must not have resulted from the Soldier's intentional misconduct or willful neglect and must not have been incurred during a period of unauthorized absence.
	b.  Chapter 8 (Reserve Component) outlines the rules for processing Soldiers of the Reserve Component (RC) through the PDES who are on active duty for a period of less than 30 days or on inactive duty training.  Paragraph 8- 2 provides that Soldiers of the RC eligible for processing under this paragraph are those who incur a disability from an injury determined to be the proximate result of performing annual training, active duty special work, active duty for training with or without pay, or temporary tour of active duty under a call or order that specifies a period of 30 days or less, to include full-time training duty; inactive duty training (IDT), including IDT without pay under competent orders; active duty for training; and disability from disease incurred while performing duty (a determination must be made whether the disease was the proximate result of performing duty).

11.  Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Transfers, Details, and Transfers) provides policy and procedures on the transfer to and from the Retired Reserve.  Chapter 6 (Transfer to and from the Retired Reserve), paragraph 6-1 (Eligibility), shows that assignment to the Retired Reserve is authorized and an eligible Soldier must request transfer if he or she:

	a.  is entitled to receive retired pay from the U.S. Armed Forces because of prior military service;

	b.  has completed a total of 20 years of active or inactive service in the U.S. Armed Forces;

	c.  is medically disqualified for active duty resulting from a service-connected disability; or

	d.  is medically disqualified, not as a result of own misconduct, for retention in an active status or entry on active duty, regardless of the total years of service completed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was referred to an MEB/PEB for a disability rating determination due to an injury that existed prior to service and was determined to be in the line of duty because he was found medically unfit for duty in the USAR based on the medical condition.

2.  Records show the applicant was treated on 19 February 2002 for his neck pain that existed prior to service (emphasis added).  He reinjured his neck on
14 October 2002, the examining physician indicated he was medically unfit, and the applicant was issued a temporary profile through 31 December 2002.


3.  The evidence of record shows that Soldiers of the RC who incur a disability from an injury determined to be the proximate result of performing duty while in a pay status (including IDT without pay under competent orders) will be processed through the PDES.  The evidence of record shows the applicant's injury existed prior to service.  There is insufficient evidence to show he was in a pay status or IDT under competent orders that would have required referral to the PDES.

4.  Orders reassigned the applicant to the USAR (Retired Reserve) effective
15 April 2005.  The reason was "Medically Disqualified - Not Result of Own Misconduct" and the authority was Army Regulation 140-10.

5.  The evidence of record shows the governing Army regulation provides that assignment to the Retired Reserve is authorized and an eligible Soldier may request transfer if he is medically disqualified (not as a result of own misconduct) for retention in an active status or entry on active duty, regardless of the total years of service completed.

6.  The applicant's "20-Year" letter shows the applicant requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.

7.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023388



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009764



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008282

    Original file (20130008282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (4) On 26 March 2004, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) considered his bilateral knee pain due to patellofemoral arthritis unfit, existed prior to service and permanently aggravated by an LOD injury on 12 August 2003. (4) His orders show he has 20 years of service and his DD Form 214 states he was discharged with severance pay. The evidence of record shows he later submitted a statement requesting his medical board paperwork be reevaluated to increase his disability rating to 40% for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009328

    Original file (20130009328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 March 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130009328 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a: a. DD Form 294 (Application for a Review by the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) of the Rating Awarded Accompanying a Medical Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), dated 27 November 2012. b. Medical records showing his medical condition from 29 July 2008 to 10 November 2009. k. A 15 January 2010 DA Form 2173 (Statement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007435

    Original file (20140007435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his military medical records, separation documents, and VA rating decisions. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. c. Chapter 8 (Reserve Component), paragraph 8-6 (Medical Processing), provides: (1) When a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008734

    Original file (20120008734.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he received a medical retirement, nor does it support his request for correction of item 9 of his final DD Form 214 to show he retired with more than 20 years of service. The applicant states the PEB failed to consider the physical profiles he received during his service; however, having had a temporary or permanent physical profile is not evidence of an unfitting condition. The record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028773

    Original file (20100028773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. Neither his commander, nor any official within the PRARNG, ensured that a Line of Duty (LOD) investigation was conducted prior to his release from active duty (REFRAD). The board determined: * he was not able to comply with all of his MOS duties * he received a 20% Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability rating * he had completed 25 years of service and was qualified for retirement by Medical Conditions The board recommended he receive an L4 permanent profile with the assignment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020448

    Original file (20110020448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. on 23 March 2002, he was directed to appear before a medical duty review board (MDRB) after which he was issued a permanent profile rating of 4 for his lower extremities and recommended for separation; and b. his separation from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) was erroneous. He submitted: a. an SF 558, dated 21 July 1986, which shows he was transported by ambulance due to trauma to his back; b. an SF 509, which shows he was admitted to the hospital on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000012

    Original file (20120000012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's service records including his personnel and medical records are not available for review with this case. The applicant was medically separated from the PRARNG in 2004 and placed on the retired list. A Soldier who suffers an injury or an illness while on active duty is retained in the service until he or she has attained maximum hospital benefits and completion of disability evaluation if otherwise eligible for referral into the disability system.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003586

    Original file (20130003586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was injured while entitled to basic pay * his DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated February 2003, shows he was referred to an MEB; but, his MEB was never completed * there is no evidence showing he was properly counseled about his right to an MEB/PEB * he was issued an administrative honorable discharge instead of being referred through the PDES * it was the responsibility of his commander and the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) leadership to ensure he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008194

    Original file (20140008194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was diagnosed with a post motor vehicle accident left thigh wound and acute stress disorder. He had been cleared by all TBI services to be released from active duty (REFRAD). After his release from active duty, he continued to serve with his USAR unit to his MSO date of 10 February 2013.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007123.

    Original file (20140007123..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) records as follows: * have the TNARNG complete a line of duty (LOD) investigation * have the TNARNG process him through the medical evaluation board/physical evaluation board (MEB/PEB) * medical retirement by reason of disability 2. Chapter 3 provides for various medical conditions and physical defects which may render a Soldier unfit for further military service and which fall below the standards required for...