Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009533
Original file (20120009533.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    29 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009533 

THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an extension to move her household goods.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  she is requesting an exception to policy to move her household goods because the regulation was written during the time when it was more feasible for retirees to move within that time without creating undue hardship.  She requests the regulation be updated to prevent retirees from going through undue economical stress.

	b.  the transportation office in San Antonio, TX called and informed her to request an extension because they did not have the authority and they were not aware she was granted an extension and that her record was corrected to reflect the change.

	c.  while waiting for the results from the Board, she had to seek employment through the American Legion to pay her bills.  She is currently a member of the American Legion and she is obligated to them through June 2012.

	d.  she is still seeking continuous medical care for her knee, shoulder, and joint pain.  She is being treated at the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) for degenerative bones.



	e.  currently she is still working with her rehabilitation counselor to complete her LPC examination.  Due to post traumatic stress disorder, she failed her first two examinations so she is attempting to get her license.  By doing that she has to attend the Wells Spring training prior to the examination.

	f.  she has been trying to sell her house but due to the economy she is unable to sell it.  If this home is not sold she is unable to financially maintain two households at this time.  Moving right now would create undue hardship.       

3.  The applicant provides:

* Contract with the American Legion
* Appointment sheet for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant retired on 30 April 2006 in the rank of master sergeant after completing over 22 years of active duty.  Her retirement orders notified her she was authorized up to 1 year to complete selection of a home and complete travel in connection with this action.  

2.  Information obtained from the Chief, Transportation Policy Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, Headquarters, Department of the Army revealed she submitted a request for extension of her transportation entitlement in 2007 but did not follow-up the extension approval or submit future requests.  

3.  On 8 September 2011, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) granted relief by correcting the applicant's records to show she timely requested and received approval for annual extensions of her retirement transportation entitlements through 30 April 2012 (6 years after her retirement).   

4.  She provided a contract from the American Legion which shows her term of service began on 8 June 2011 and ended on 7 May 2012. 

5.  She also provided an incomplete (no patient name or date) appointment sheet indicating an MRI was performed.

6.  Volume 1 (Uniformed Service Personnel) of the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) contains basic statutory regulations concerning official travel and transportation of members of the Uniformed Services.  Paragraph U5130 states travel to a selected home must be completed within 1 year of active duty termination.  A written time limit extension may be authorized/approved using the Secretarial Process.  An explanation of the circumstances justifying the extension must include the specific additional time period; a description of the circumstances that prevent use within the prescribed time; and acknowledgement that the extension is not being granted merely to accommodate personal preferences or convenience.

7.  Extension provisions to the 1-year time limit are also provided for deserving cases under the Secretarial process.  This process allows for extensions based on an unexpected event beyond the member's control that prevents movement to a permanent duty station within the specified time limit.  An extension of the time limit may be authorized by the Secretarial process if it is in the best interest of the service or substantially to the member's benefit and not costly or otherwise adverse to the service.  These extensions are approved for the specific period of time that the member anticipates is needed to complete the move, and if additional time is required, the member may request a further extension.  Paragraph U5012-I of volume 1 of the JFTR provides the policy on restrictions to time limit extensions and states a written time-limit extension that includes an explanation of the circumstances justifying the extension may be approved for a specific additional time period using the Secretarial process.  However, extensions under this process will not be authorized if it extends travel and transportation allowances for more than 6 years from the separation/retirement date.  

8.  The JFTR states an extension must not be authorized/approved if it extends travel and transportation allowances for more than 6 years from the date of separation or release from active duty or retirement unless a member’s certified on-going medical condition prevents relocation of the member for longer than
6 years from the separation/retirement date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant retired on 30 April 2006 and her retirement orders indicate she was authorized up to 1 year to complete selection of home and complete travel in connection with this action.  She submitted a request for extension of her transportation entitlement in 2007 but did not follow-up the extension approval or submit future requests.  

2.  In September 2011, the ABCMR corrected her records to show she timely requested and received approval for annual extensions of her retirement transportation entitlements through 30 April 2012 (6 years after her retirement).   

3.  Extensions will not be authorized if it extends travel and transportation allowances for more than 6 years from the retirement date.

4.  She is now requesting an extension to move her household goods due to employment obligations, medical issues, and the inability to sell her home.      

5.  The American Legion contract she provided shows her employment obligation ended on 7 May 2012.   

6.  She contends she is still seeking continuous medical care for her knee, shoulder, and joint pain and she is being treated for degenerative bones at the VA.  However, there is no evidence of record and she provided no evidence which shows she had a certified on-going medical condition which prevented her relocation for longer than 6 years from the separation/retirement date.

7.  She has failed to show through the evidence she submitted and the evidence of record that an exception is warranted in her case at this time.

8.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009533





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009533



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011057

    Original file (20140011057.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of the previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision in Docket Number AR20130002844 on 19 December 2013. They also establish time limitations for the shipment of HHG and state that travel must be completed within 1 year from the active service termination date. The applicant's request for reconsideration of her earlier request for reinstatement of her expired transportation entitlements – the relocation of her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018302

    Original file (20110018302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * She was involved in an industrial accident and she sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and has been under medical care since July 2006 * She was unaware of the requirement to apply for a yearly extension * She is also involved in an on-going personal injury lawsuit and a worker's compensation lawsuit in California * She was not considering relocation since she was a widow and was not married at the time of her accident * After she remarried in July 2009 she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000088

    Original file (20130000088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She contacted an individual at the transportation office, Carlisle Barracks, PA, in June 2011, a year after her retirement, to reinstate her HHG transportation authorization. Therefore, given she has explained the circumstances that led to her failure to submit the extension request on time and notwithstanding the Department of the Army G-4's advisory opinion that extension is not authorized, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to correct her record to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011551

    Original file (20090011551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show that on 13 September 2005 the applicant's request for an extension of travel and transportation entitlements was approved through 31 July 2006. However, in her 27 April 2009 request, she indicates that employment was the only reason she had not requested an extension since 2007. She had already requested and received two extensions to her travel entitlements.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007095

    Original file (20120007095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she timely requested an extension of her entitlement to ship her household goods (HHG) to her home of selection (HOS). Travel and transportation entitlements expire 6 years from the date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing she timely requested extension of her travel and transportation entitlements on 30 April 2010 that was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004327

    Original file (20090004327.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. A chronological listing, titled: Notes to Support Extension of Transportation Request, showing the applicant's efforts in requesting an extension of his travel and transportation entitlements post-retirement. On 13 October 2008, the applicant requested that his retirement home of selection travel and transportation entitlements be reinstated. Paragraph U5012-I of the JFTR states that a written time limit extension that includes an explanation of the circumstances justifying the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004452

    Original file (20130004452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). These JFTR provisions and time limitations for the shipment of HHG were also in effect at the time of the retired service member's retirement. The JFTR indicates that retirement transportation and travel entitlements will be used within 1 year of retirement; however, it also provides for extensions of this entitlement in 1-year increments up to 5 additional years, or a total of 6 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006341

    Original file (20120006341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he retired from the U.S. Army on 1 April 2008 * in the summer of 2011, he conducted a permanent change of station (PCS) move mandated by the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Act as a Department of the Army Civilian (DAC) employee from Fort McPherson, GA to Williamsburg, VA * an official in the Fort McPherson, GA, Transportation Office recommended that he use his personally procured move (PPM) (formerly known as a do-it-yourself (DITY) move) entitlement from his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010824

    Original file (20100010824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted an extension of his travel and transportation entitlements. The applicant was provided a copy of this advisory opinion and given the opportunity to respond. The applicant states that he did not request an extension of his travel and transportation entitlements because of the operational tempo of his civilian job.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018020

    Original file (20130018020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a Memorandum for Record, entitled "Travel and Transportation Entitlement Extension Request," dated 7 August 2013. a. The retired service member and applicant requested an extension because the retired service member's doctor recommended he relocate. However, given the applicant has explained the circumstances that led to the applicant's/retired service member's failure to submit the extension request on time, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice...