Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009504
Original file (20120009504.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009504 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to authorize payment of the second half of his enlistment bonus.  

2.  The applicant states when he enlisted in the Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) he was told he was authorized a $15,000.00 enlistment bonus.  He claims he received half the bonus.  However, in 2011 when he was supposed to receive the second half of the bonus, he was told because of a mix up in the date of his bonus document he would not receive the second half of the bonus.  He states he is unsure of the problem but needs the second half of his bonus.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Memorandum, Subject:  Request for Exception to Policy for Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB), dated 
6 December 2011
* his DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 23 July 2011
* DD Form 1966/3 (Record of Military Processing-Armed Forces of the United States)


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After previously serving 7 years, 10 months, and 24 days in the Regular Army and 1 year in the OKARNG, he enlisted in the OKARNG on 5 June 2008 for a period of 6 years.
2.  The applicant and his recruiter signed his DD Form 1966 on 6 June 2008.

	a.  Item 32a (Specific Option/Program Enlisted For) on the DD Form 1966/3 indicates he was enlisting for a PSEB.

	b.    Section VI - Remarks on DD Form 1966/4 indicates he was enlisting for a position in military occupational specialty (MOS) 88M.

3.  An NGB Form 600-7-6-R-E, titled Annex X PSEB Addendum ARNGUS, completed during his enlistment processing shows he was authorized a PSEB of $15,000 for a 6-year enlistment in the ARNG in MOS 88M.  The NGB Form 600-7-6-R-E was signed by the applicant and his service representative on 
22 September 2008.

4.  A DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 3 May 2009, shows he achieved course standards for MOS 88M Phase 1.  

5.  DA Forms 2166-8 (NCO Evaluation Report) for the periods ending 
30 November 2009, 30 November 2010, and 30 November 2011 show he was awarded and is working in MOS 88M.

6.  On 6 December 2011, the NGB denied his request for an exception to policy to retain his $15,000 PSEB and directed the State Incentive Manager to terminate the applicant's incentive eligibility.  The basis for this action was that the applicant signed his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States) enlisting the OKARNG on 5 June 2008; however, he did not sign his NGB Form 600-7-6-R-E until 22 September 2008.  Additional research of the Information Management and Reporting Center (IMARC) reflects that a Bonus Control Number (BCN) was requested on 21 June 2008 which was retroactive to the extension date.  Because a BCN was not requested when he enlisted and because the bonus addendum was signed after he enlisted, the government's intent to offer him an incentive could not be validated.  The ARNG granted relief from recoupment of the $7,500 payment he had already received.

7.  Army Regulation 135-7 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve - Incentive Programs) prescribes policies and procedures for the administration of the ARNG and U.S. Army Reserve incentive programs.  Chapter 2-1 contains guidance on the administration of the PSEB.  Soldiers meeting the eligibility criteria may be awarded a PSEB.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to be paid the PSEB he was promised in conjunction with his 2008 enlistment in the OKARNG has been carefully considered and found to have merit.  

2.  The entries in Item 32a and Section VI of his DD Form 1966 clearly show it was the government's intent to enlist him with a PSEB.  The bonus addendum confirms he was promised a PSEB of $15,000 for enlistment in the OKARNG in 2008.  It appears that as a result of an administrative error on the part of State recruiting officials, the PSEB addendum was not properly signed on 5 June 2008, the date of his enlistment, and was instead signed on 22 September 2008.  

3.  He was awarded the MOS for which he was enlisted and continues to serve the enlistment for which the PSEB was awarded.

4.  The evidence shows the action terminating the applicant's eligibility for the PSEB was the result of an administrative error and was through no fault of the applicant.  Therefore, because the applicant was otherwise eligible to receive the PSEB and based on the moral commitment made by the Army, the fact the PSEB addendum was improperly dated should not result in the applicant being denied the bonus he was eligible for and promised.  Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the record to show the applicant enlisted and signed the PSEB annex on 5 June 2008.  As a result of this correction, the applicant should be paid any remaining portion of the PSEB due. 

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he signed his DD Form 4 and Annex X, Bonus Addendum on 5 June 2008, and by paying him any remaining portion of the PSEB due.  Payment of this bonus should come from Army National Guard funds.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009504



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009504



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029787

    Original file (20100029787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states when she enlisted in the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG), the addendum she signed stated she would receive a bonus if she completed training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 42A (Human Resources Specialist) and became duty MOS qualified (DMOSQ) within 24 months of her enlistment. She was told MOS 42A was a critical MOS and she would receive the PSEB; accordingly, she proceeded to sign the PSEB addendum and the enlistment contract. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004177

    Original file (20120004177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    h. A reply received on 19 December 2011 shows the bonus addendum was missing from iPERMS and suggested the applicant submit an Exception to Policy to obtain the second half of the PSEB. The applicant enlisted in the MNARNG on 8 December 2008 for the PSEB; however, there is no PSEB addendum on file and none of his enlistment documentation supports he was ever offered the incentive. However, his record is absent of documentation and he has not provided sufficient evidence to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013041

    Original file (20100013041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    To be eligible for the bonus he was required to enlist for 6 years and become MOS qualified (MOSQ) within 24 months of his enlistment. On 25 January 2010, by memorandum, the Chief, Education, Incentives, and Employment Division, National Guard Bureau (NGB), denied the applicant's request for an exception to policy to allow him to receive his $15,000 bonus because he was not MOSQ at the time of enlistment and the MOS in which he enlisted was not a critical skill for the State at the time. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019702

    Original file (20130019702.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he executed his enlistment and Bonus Addendum in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on the same date and payment of the second half of his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB). The applicant indicated/acknowledged he understood: * upon his enlistment in the ARNG, he would be eligible for an enlistment bonus as indicated in the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) * he was enlisting in a critical skill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028917

    Original file (20100028917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The official stated, effective 1 April 2009, the PS enlistment bonus was no longer authorized for those who were not MOSQ at the time of enlistment. He stated the Soldier signed the enlistment bonus in good faith and had fulfilled all requirements in the contract to receive the bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected to: * Show he enlisted for MOS 35M, qualified for a $15,000...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004365

    Original file (20120004365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the date on his Annex X (Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB) Addendum – Army National Guard of the United States) to his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) be corrected. Title 37, U.S. Code, section 308i(a)(2)(A), in effect at the time, stated a person who is a former enlisted member of an armed force who enlists in the Selected Reserve for a period of 3 or 6 years in a critical military skill designated for a PSEB maybe paid such a bonus only if the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007547

    Original file (20130007547.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he remains entitled to his $10,000 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB). A DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) indicates he enlisted in the MDARNG on 4 April 2009. The denying official stated the Enlisting Official and Service Representative failed to sign and date the addendum, the BCN was requested after the date of enlistment, and the incentive was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018758

    Original file (20090018758.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of his Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB) for which he enlisted as an exception to policy. The recommendation was based on the NGB Form 600-7-R-E, dated 28 July 2008 signed by the applicant; b. NGB Form 600-7-R-E shows the applicant met the requirements of his contract and was issued a bonus control number of P089080009AR; c. ARNG SRIP Guidance for Fiscal Year 2007, 10 August 2007 – 31 March 2007 Policy Number 07-06 and continuation memorandum, dated 20 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009758

    Original file (20120009758.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states in 2008 when he enlisted in the Massachusetts Army National Guard (MAARNG) he was authorized a $7500.00 enlistment bonus. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his request: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 29 June 2008 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Memorandum, Subject: Request for Exception to Policy for Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB), dated 18 January 2012 * DD Form 1966/1-6 (Record of Military Processing-Armed Forces...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012701

    Original file (20130012701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Director stated: * the MOS was not on the list of approved critical skills at the time of enlistment * a Bonus Addendum could not be found * a Bonus Control Number (BCN) was given which supported an incentive being offered at the time * a review of policy and her DD Form 4 supported an incentive being offered at the time 7. The advisory opinion further stated her DD Form 1966 and bonus addendum could not be found in her record, though her DD Form 4 supports an incentive being offered at...