Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009502
Original file (20120009502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  7 February 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009502 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) for captain (CPT) back to her original DOR to CPT of 1 November 2005.

2.  The applicant states she incurred a reduction in rank from CPT to first lieutenant (1LT) in order to attend the Interservice Physician Assistant Program (IPAP).  She also transferred from the Medical Services Corps (MSC) to the Army Medical Specialist Corps (AMSC) in order to attend this program.  Her constructive credit and DOR were adjusted accordingly.

3.  She was promoted to CPT again while attending the IPAP with a new DOR of 1 December 2007.  She resigned from the IPAP shortly before completing Phase II of the program.  She completed a new DA Form 71 (Oath of Office) in April 2010 for her transfer back to the MSC.  However, her DOR was not adjusted back to her original DOR to CPT.  She further states that the IPAP branch chief at the time indicated she should get her DOR back and that two other officers, which she names, went through a similar situation and indicated they received their original DOR back.

4.  She provides a list of documents she submits in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer on 10 August 2002 in the rank of second lieutenant (2LT).

2.  She was promoted to the rank of CPT in the MSC effective 1 November 2005.

3.  On 3 December 2006, she was appointed as a 1LT in the AMSC based on her constructive credit for prior commissioned service.  She was assigned an active DOR of 6 April 2006.

4.  Orders 233-004, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), dated 29 November 2007, show she was promoted to the rank of CPT again, this time in the AMSC with an effective date and DOR of 1 December 2007.

5.  Email transmissions in April 2009 indicate that if the applicant resigned from the IPAP she would be transferred back to the MSC and regain her time in rank as a CPT.

6.  On 20 April 2009, she submitted a letter of resignation from the IPAP.

7.  A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 14 June 2009, shows she acknowledged that upon acceptance into the MSC she was required to accept a new appointment which may reduce her rank due to provisions in Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 6000.13 that outlines a constructive credit formula for officers being appointed into a special branch.  She requested that the Surgeon General waived entry grade credit provisions of DODI 6000.13.  She further indicated if her request to have the entry grade credit provisions of DODI 6000.13 waived were disapproved she still wished to transfer to the MSC, understanding that a constructive credit formula would be applied and she would receive 1/2 credit for any active federal commissioned service she had completed.

8.  A DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade (Health Services Officers)), dated 24 July 2009, shows she qualified for appointment to the MSC in the rank of CPT with award of no constructive credit for the rank of CPT.

9.  On 28 April 2010, she was reappointed in the Regular Army MSC in the rank of CPT.

10.  Orders 169-005, issued by HRC, dated 18 June 2010, show her with an active DOR determination of 1 December 2007 in the MSC.

11.  In connection with the processing of this case, on 13 July 2012, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Officer Promotions, HRC.  The advisory official stated the applicant's DOR adjustment was the result of her reappointment from the MSC to the AMSC on 28 April 2010.  Her grade determination was the result of her reappointment to the MSC and her DOR was based on the Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit/Constructive Service Credit of current grade held.  The applicant's DOR of 1 December 2007 was the result of a promotion selection board convened in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 36, section 611.

12.  The official stated the applicant was fully aware of this voluntary action as evidenced by Statements of Understanding she signed on 3 December 2006 and the DA Form 4187 signed on 4 May 2009.  When she volunteered to leave the MSC and enter the IPAP, she was reappointed as a 1LT.  This action required her to be re-scrolled and administered a new Oath of Office.  The administration of her new Oath of Office as an MSC officer voided her previous Oath of Office as an MSC officer.  Therefore, her DOR of 1 December 2007 is the official Senate Confirmation date in accordance with Title 10 U.S. Code, Section 624.

13.  Additionally, on 12 September 2012, an advisory opinion was also obtained from the Chief, MSC Branch, Health Services Directorate.  The advisory official states the applicant was initially commissioned as a 2LT on 10 August 2002.  She was promoted to captain on 1 November 2005 in the MSC.  She applied for and was selected for IPAP.  Contingent upon her selection for IPAP, she was appointed to first lieutenant in the AMSC on 6 April 2006 in accordance with DODI 6000.13, section 6.1.1.1 based on the fact she had 39 months of time as an officer.  She was promoted to CPT in the AMSC on 1 December 2007.

14.  The advisory official further stated the applicant was non-academically relieved from the IPAP through voluntary resignation and reappointed into the MSC from the AMSC.  In accordance with DODI 6000.13, section 6.1.1.1, she should have been reduced to 1LT when switching from one corps to another; however, The Surgeon General at the time waived the provisions of
DODI 6000.13 allowing her to retain her current grade of CPT with a date of rank of 1 December 2007.  The advisory official recommended the applicant's DOR as CPT remain unchanged with a DOR of 1 December 2007 as approved by The Surgeon General of the Army.

15.  The advisory opinions were provided to the applicant for information and to allow her the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  She addresses her entry grade for the AMSC and MSC as being considered the same corps.  She further references DODI 6000.13, subsection 6.1.1.1 that states "service on active duty or in an active status as a commissioned officer in any of the Uniformed Services, in the corps or professional specialty in which being appointed, shall be credited on a day-for-day basis with any commissioned service performed before such appointment."  She questions whether this pertains to her situation or not.  She contends if she had known she would not have regained her original DOR to CPT at reinstatement she would have continued with IPAP.  She states the most exasperating thing during all of this is that two of her former colleagues who went through the exact same situation received their original dates of rank upon returning to the MSC.

16.  DODI 6000.13 implements policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures under DOD Directive 6000.12 (Health Services Operations and Readiness) to carry out medical manpower and personnel programs.

	a.  Paragraph 6.1. (Entry Grade Credit) provides that a prospective health profession officer's entry grade and rank within grade shall be determined by the number of years of entry grade credit awarded on original appointment, designation, or assignment as a health professions officer.  It further states credit for prior service as a commissioned officer (other than as a commissioned warrant officer) shall be granted to recognize previous commissioned experience, while maintaining cognizance of the level of professional knowledge, skill, and experience required at specific rank levels of each health profession.  For entry grade credit, the MSC, the Biomedical Science Corps, and the AMSC are considered as the same corps.  The Secretaries shall establish procedures to ensure the awarding of prior commissioned service credit is applied in an equitable and consistent manner.

	b.  Credit shall be awarded as follows:

		(1)  6.1.1.1. - Service on active duty or in an active status as a commissioned officer in any of the Uniformed Services, in the corps or professional specialty in which being appointed, shall be credited on a day-for-day basis with any commissioned service performed before such appointment.

		(2) 6.1.1.2. - Service on active duty or in an active status as a commissioned officer in any of the Uniformed Services, but not in the corps or professional specialty in which being appointed, shall be awarded one-half day of credit for each day served in the case of individuals seeking an original appointment as a health professions officer.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for an adjustment to her DOR, as she contends the IPAP branch chief told her she would receive upon her transfer from the AMSC back to the MSC, has been carefully considered.  She contends, in effect, that 


she should receive credit for prior commissioned service including that in the 
rank of 1LT while attending the IPAP toward her CPT DOR upon reappointment in the MSC because the MSC and AMSC are considered the same corps for entry grade credit purposes.  

2.  In accordance with DODI 6000.13, section 6.1.1.1, she should have been and she was reduced to 1LT when switching from the MSC to AMSC.  This same policy would normally have applied to her transfer back to the MSC.  However, The Surgeon General waived this requirement in her case.  As such, it appears there was no error or injustice upon her reappointment to the MSC in the rank of Captain with a DOR of 1 December 2007.

3.  She further contends she would have continued with the IPAP if she had known she would not have received her original DOR to CPT of 1 November 2005.  However, she indicated in DA Forms 4187 that she would accept whatever happened regarding her rank and accept a reappointment in the MSC.

4.  Her contentions and questions regarding the usage or computation of entry grade credit in regard to her currently-assigned DOR are noted.  However, the use of such entry grade credit is used only for entry grade and rank within grade credit awarded on original appointment, designation, or assignment as a health professions officer.  She transferred to the AMSC and back to the MSC.  Therefore, her reference to DODI 6000.13, paragraph 6.1.1 does not pertain to her case.  In addition, she was fully aware that her rank (and therefore possibly her DOR) would be changed when she signed the 14 June 2009 DA Form 4187, and she still requested transfer to the MSC.

5.  The AHRC Chief, Promotions Branch and Health Services Directorate Chief, MSC Branch confirm her DOR was assigned in accordance with the governing law and regulation.  A review of DODI 6000.13 confirms this determination.  The fact she may have been misinformed or that miscommunication may have occurred regarding the DOR assignment does not alter the fact her DOR is correct as it currently stands.

6.  She also contends two other officers went through a similar situation and they received their original DOR back.  Whether or not the two colleagues' situation was the same or not, the fact is her DOR appears to be correct.  As such, there is no basis for adjusting her DOR to CPT to any other date.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009502



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009502



6


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002496

    Original file (20130002496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She should have received day-for-day credit for her prior commissioned service in the Medical Service Corps, but she received half-day credit, which resulted in her reduction. The advisory official stated that, after careful review of the applicant's records, it was the opinion of his office that she was properly given half-day service credit for her prior active commissioned service. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request to be awarded day-for-day credit for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001396

    Original file (20080001396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was awarded one-half credit instead of full credit (i.e., day-for-day credit) for his commissioned service in the Medical Service Corps (MSC) performed prior to his appointment as a commissioned officer in the Army Medical Specialist Corps (AMSC). Additionally, section 6.1.1.1 states that service on active duty or in an active status as a commissioned officer in any of the Uniformed services, in the corps or professional specialty in which being appointed, shall...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010167

    Original file (20070010167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Promotion orders to first lieutenant (1LT) in the Aviation Branch, an order revoking his promotion to 1LT in the Aviation Branch, and then his appointment into the Regular Army; c. Letters of support from his chain of command to include his combatant air ambulance company commander and his brigade commander requesting favorable consideration of his request for waiver of CSC; and d. two documents that address the subject of his Active Duty Service Obligation (ADSO) that will not be addressed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086042C070212

    Original file (2003086042C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also states that he would also qualify for the same total credit for active duty grade determination under DOD Instruction Number 6000.13 paragraph 6.2.2 which states "A former Regular or Reserve commissioned officer may, if otherwise qualified, be appointed or reappointed as a reserve officer" and paragraph 6.2.2.2 which states, "Credited, for determining date of rank under Section 741 (d) of 10 US Code reference (c), with service in grade equal to that held by that person when...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007575

    Original file (20100007575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100007575 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 2-2, states that the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is that date on which the commissioned officer executes the oaths of office in the State. The email shows that a Medical Personnel Program Manager from the OTCS, NGB informed her that his office was not consulted on the advisory opinion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014975

    Original file (20120014975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * her original DOR to the rank of captain (CPT) was 1 May 2005 * she was selected for the Funded Nurse Education Program (FNEP) and began the program on 10 December 2007 * as a condition of the program, she transferred branches to the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) after she received her nursing degree on 30 August 2009 * her DOR was then recalculated * before her DOR was adjusted, she was selected for promotion to the rank of major (MAJ) * after the U.S. Army Human Resources...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017950

    Original file (20140017950.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a DA Form 5074-1, dated 28 January 2010, wherein it shows, in part, he received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Geology on 7 May 1995 and would be awarded credit for: * professional experience from 8 May 1995-1 October 1997 and from 1 December 2002-13 March 2005 of 2 years, 4 months, and 3 days * prior active commissioned service from 16 December 1999-30 November 2002 and 14 March 2005-22 June 2010 of 4 years, 1 months, 11 days * he was granted a total entry grade credit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004900

    Original file (20090004900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. A copy of a DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers)), dated 20 July 2005. d. A copy of her DA Form 71 (Oath of Office-Military Personnel), dated 13 March 2006. e. An NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office), dated 13 March 2006. f. Orders 126-700, issued by the Joint Forces Headquarters, WIARNG, on 6 May 2006. g. An NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board), dated 14 June 2005. h. Copies of NGB Special Orders Number 127 AR, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028125

    Original file (20100028125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was granted 2 years of constructive credit upon entry on active duty in the Regular Army (RA). Part I, section B (Credit for Advanced Education Beyond Basic Qualifying Degree), she was granted a Master of Science Degree in Nursing from the University of South Florida, on 5 May 2000; c. Part I, section D (Credit for Professional Experience), she held an "ARNP Florida License" from 31 July 1995 to 18 November 2008; d. Part II (Prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008591

    Original file (20130008591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that on 2 August 2007 he was commissioned as a Regular Army (RA) Signal Corps (SC) officer in the rank of second lieutenant (2LT) as a year group 2007 officer. b. Paragraph 1-40 (Determining active date of rank for commissioned officers) states in sub-paragraph 1-40b, the ADOR of an officer receiving an original appointment as an RA commissioned officer, other than as stated in chapter 2, is the date the appointment is accepted unless: (1) The officer was, at the time...