Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009270
Original file (20120009270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009270 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his general discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states:

* he enlisted in the Army because his father was in the Army
* he was never a good runner and failed many runs which led to his discharge for unsatisfactory performance
* he completed his Reserve obligation and was honorably discharged on 16 September 2003
* he served his country as best as he could at the time

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Honorable Discharge Certificate from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program (DEP) for a period of 8 years on 14 September 1995.  On 9 January 1996, he was discharged from the USAR DEP and enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 January 1996.  

3.  The applicant completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 14S (Avenger Crewmember).  The highest rank/grade he attained while on active duty was private/E-2.

4.  The complete facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge action are not available for review with this case.  However, in his DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552), the applicant provides the following information:

* he was absent without leave during the period 5 to 27 May 1997
* he received nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)

5.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows, on 18 July 1997, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training), due to unsatisfactory performance, with service characterized as under honorable conditions (general).  His DD Form 214 also shows he completed 1 year, 4 months, and 24 days of creditable active military service with 20 days of lost time.   

6.  On 16 September 2003, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the requirements and procedures for administrative discharge of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 13, in effect at the time, provided for separation due to unsatisfactory performance when, in the commander's judgment, the individual will not become a satisfactory Soldier; retention will have an adverse impact on military discipline, good order, and morale; the service member will be a disruptive influence in the future; the basis for separation will continue or recur; and/or the ability of the service member to perform effectively in the future, including potential for advancement or leadership, is unlikely.  Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance under this regulation were characterized as honorable or under honorable conditions.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to upgrade his general discharge to an honorable discharge was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support this request.

2.  Although his record is void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge action on 18 July 1997, he stated he was AWOL and received nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ. 

3.  A properly-constituted DD Form 214 identifies the reason and characterization of his separation on 18 July 1997.  This document carries with it a presumption of government regularity in the discharge process.

4.  The honorable discharge that he received from the USAR has no bearing on his active duty separation, which occurred over 5 years earlier on 18 July 1997.

5.  Therefore, absent evidence to the contrary, it is concluded his separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation and the requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009270



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009270



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007848

    Original file (20140007848.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was not released from his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit as an unsatisfactory participant. The applicant enlisted in the USAR for a term of 8 years on 29 July 1991. His family of four have already sold their home and he would like the Board to consider amending his discharge to honorable, as he feels being released in October 1997 as an unsatisfactory participant is painful.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014998

    Original file (20130014998.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Nine HHC, AVN BDE, memoranda addressed to the applicant at his home of record and last known address in Waldorf, MD, and sent via certified mail show the applicant failed to attend scheduled unit IDT as follows: Number of Cumulative Date Dates of Unexcused Unexcused Notified Drills Absences Absences 19 March 1997 8-9 March 1997 4 4 28 May 1997 17-18 May 1997 4 8 20 August 1997 9-10 August 1997 4 4 25 September 1997 20-21 September 1997 4 8 14 October 1997 4-5 October 1997 4 12 14 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001997

    Original file (20110001997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 6 September 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110001997 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 20 September 2007 for a period of 6 years. His Selected Reserve Incentive Program – USAR Prior-Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum shows he enlisted for 6 years with less than 16 years of service and for a $15,000.00 bonus.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002615

    Original file (20140002615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He comes before this Board 18 years after the fact with little or no evidence to show that the reason for his transfer at the time was in error or unjust. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that an error or injustice exists in his case, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018969

    Original file (20130018969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the characterization of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service be changed to honorable and issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The doctor requested the applicant's release from service and stated the applicant was unable to continue in service. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 would be prepared for members of the USAR under the following circumstances: * after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008030

    Original file (20090008030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); Headquarters, 2nd Troop, 104th Aviation Battalion, Annville, PA, memorandum, dated 9 December 1995; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Military Affairs, The Adjutant General, Annville, PA, Orders 025-012, dated 6 February 1996; NGB Form 22 (Report of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001062

    Original file (20150001062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged under honorable conditions (general) on 12 August 1997, under the provisions Army Regulation 600-8-24, paragraph 3-13 or 3-15, by reason of resignation for the good of the service and given the SPD code of "DFS." Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges) prescribes the officer transfers from active duty to the Reserve Component and discharge functions for all officers on active duty for 30 days or more. However, his records do not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000398

    Original file (20110000398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Army) * his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * his Honorable Discharge Certificate * a memorandum from the U.S. Department of Justice * a character reference letter CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. There is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001599

    Original file (20090001599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 29 March 1996, the Staff Judge Advocate, in a written review for the convening authority, summarized the charges, specifications, pleas, findings, and sentence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012254

    Original file (20130012254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. The evidence of record shows he completed OSUT at Fort Knox, KY and was awarded MOS 19D.