Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009207
Original file (20120009207.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  29 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009207 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect all awards and decorations associated with his service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 was never updated with all his service ribbons, awards, and decorations.  He served in Vietnam with 2nd Battalion, 22nd Infantry, 25th Infantry Division.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 5 December 1970.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on
13 September 1966.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11D (Armor Intelligence Specialist).

3.  Headquarters, 1st Armored Division, Fort Hood, TX, issued the following Special Orders (SO):

* SO Number 32, dated 13 February 1967, awarding him the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar
* SO Number 39, dated 21 February 1967, awarding him the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Tank Bar

4.  Subsequent to MOS training and an assignment to Fort Hood, TX, he served in Vietnam from 26 January 1968 to 4 August 1968.  He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 22nd Infantry,
25th Infantry Division (Light).

5.  There is no derogatory information in the applicant's record that would have disqualified him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Additionally, Item 38 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.

6.  He was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 on 12 September 1968 after completing 2 years of total active service, with no lost time.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) – "See Item Number 30 (Remarks)"
* Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – "See Item Number 30"
* Item 30 (Remarks) the entry "Separated on temporary records and Soldier's affidavit"

7.  On 5 December 1970, he was issued a DD Form 215 that corrected his last name and Service Number.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military decorations, Army Good Conduct Medal, service medals and ribbons, combat and special skill badges and tabs, unit decorations, and similar devices awarded in recognition of accomplishments.  It states:

	a.  The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.  It states a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.
Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following four campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, 1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968
* Tet Counteroffensive, 30 January - 1 April 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV, 2 April - 30 June 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V, 1 July - 1 November 1968

	b.  The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.

	c.  The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001, and a date to be determined.

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 2nd Battalion, 22nd Infantry, was cited for award of the:

* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 August 1967 through 31 August 1968 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 48, dated 1971
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 1 August 1967 through 21 January 1970 by DAGO
Number 51, dated 1971
11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It stated for:

* item 22c, enter the total active duty service outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater service was performed, e.g., "USARPAC" (U.S. Army Pacific)
* item 24, enter the member's awards and decorations
* item 30, use for mandatory requirements when a separate block is not available and as a continuation entry

12.  Army Regulation 635-5, currently in effect, states that for an active duty Soldier deployed to a foreign country with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service, the statement "SERVICE IN (NAME OF COUNTRY DEPLOYED) FROM (inclusive dates for example, YYYYMMDD - YYYYMMDD)" will be entered in the Remarks block. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed 6 months and 9 days of foreign service in USARPAC (Vietnam) from 26 January 1968 to 4 August 1968.  His DD Form 214 neither listed his foreign service nor his major overseas command.  As such, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his foreign service and major overseas command.  Additionally, there will be no harm to the Army or the applicant if his Vietnam service from 26 January 1968 to 4 August 1968 is also listed in item 30 of his DD Form 214.

2.  Based on his period of service in Vietnam he is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and the Vietnam Service Medal.  Additionally, he participated in four campaigns during this period of service.  As such, he is entitled to four bronze service stars for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards.

3.  He served a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

4.  The applicant's unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his period of assignment in Vietnam.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.

5.  He served honorably during the period 13 September 1966 through 12 September 1968.  He served a qualifying period of service, attained the rank/grade of SP5/E-5, and he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service with no disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

6.  SOs awarded him the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Tank Bar.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these marksmanship badges.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

* deleting from item 22c of his DD Form 214 the entry "See Item Number 30" and replacing it with the entry "USARPAC  00  06  09"
* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 13 September 1966 through 12 September 1968
* deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the entry "See Item Number 30" and replacing it with the entry:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* 
Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Tank Bar

* Adding to item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry "Service in Vietnam From 26 January 1968 to 4 August 1968"



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009207



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009207



6


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019315

    Original file (20130019315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. The evidence of record shows he received one bronze service star. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012224

    Original file (20130012224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 April 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130012224 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. DAGOs awarded the following unit awards to the unit for actions during his tenure; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award) * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal with First Class Unit Citation * Presidential Unit Citation BOARD VOTE: ___X____...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000040

    Original file (20110000040.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He served in the RVN from 22 March through 28 May 1968; this service equals 2 months and 6 days; c. He was a patient in the 7th Field Hospital, Japan, from 29 May through 1 August 1968; this service equals 64 days; d. He was transferred to Letterman Hospital, Fort Irwin, CA, and he was later returned to duty; e. He was awarded MOS 64B2O (Heavy Truck Driver) and he drove a bus during the period 4 October through 9 December 1968; f. He was transferred to Headquarters and Headquarters Company...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018284

    Original file (20130018284.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: a. item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), he completed 1 year and 22 days of foreign service but does not contain the name of the major overseas theater or command, in his case, U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC); b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) c. item 30 (Remarks), no entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016229

    Original file (20100016229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 does not show any service in Vietnam. Paragraph 1-31c(11) states an award for previous marksmanship weapons qualification is revoked automatically whenever an individual, upon completion of firing a record course for which the previous award was made, has not attained the same qualification. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005979

    Original file (20120005979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his service dates in the Republic of Vietnam should be 23 February 1967 through 5 March 1968 * the period shown on his DD Form 214 conflicts with his dates of service in Germany * he enlisted in October 1962, took an early discharge in December 1963, and reenlisted for 6 years * he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 23 February 1967 through 5 March 1968 * he should have left Vietnam in February 1968; however, his departure was delayed because of the Tet...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000326

    Original file (20110000326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 30 of his DD Form 214 does not show any service in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 22c of his DD Form 214 the entry "0 11 29" and adding the entry "02 01 00 USARPAC" * adding to item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry "Vietnam Service 8 January 1968 - 7 February 1970" * Adding to item 24 of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020837

    Original file (20140020837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * military records * DD Form 214 * VA Rating Decision CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 30 of this DD Form 214 should also be corrected to show his Vietnam service dates. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013720

    Original file (20110013720.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. General orders awarded the applicant the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020088

    Original file (20140020088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his service record should show his service in Vietnam. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), the National Defense Service Medal; and c. Item 30 does not show he served in Vietnam; however, it shows he served in USAREUR from 28 July 1961 to 15 July 1964; USARPAC from 30 September 1965 to 1 September 1966; and USAREUR from 30 November 1967 to 26 November 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all...