Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009150
Original file (20120009150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  6 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009150 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an Army disability rating or a medical retirement for his back injuries and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

2.  He states he suffered back injuries and PTSD during his period of service in Korea.  He has gone through this process for years.  He is getting old and wants it resolved before he dies.  His wife will follow through if he dies.

3.  He provides no additional evidence.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

Counsel defers requests and statements to the applicant and provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 


substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 10 December 1962, for 3 years.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He served in Korea from 28 April 1963 through 3 June 1964.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty, in pay grade E-3, on 10 December 1965, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), at the expiration of his term of service (ETS), and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  He was credited with completing 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of net active service and 3 days of lost time.

4.  There is no evidence he was injured during his period of service in Korea.  There is no evidence he sustained injuries or suffered from any medical condition during his period of service for medical separation processing.

5.  A Report of Medical Examination, dated 26 October 1965, listed no defects and diagnoses and shows he was found qualified for separation. 

6.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 11 provided for the discharge or release from active duty upon expiration of term of enlistment.

7.  Army Regulation 40-501, in effect at the time, governed the medical fitness standards for retention and separation, including retirement.  Paragraph 3-33 states that anxiety, somatoform, or dissociative disorders are causes for referral to an medical evaluation board for persistence or recurrence of symptoms sufficient to require extended or recurrent hospitalization; or persistence or recurrence of symptoms necessitating limitations of duty or duty in protected environment; or persistence or recurrence of symptoms resulting in interference with effective military performance.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 December 1962 for 3 years.  He was released from active duty on 10 December 1965 at his ETS.  His administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time.
2.  His contentions have been noted; however, there is no evidence of record he incurred or suffered from disabling injuries/conditions during his period of service that would have supported his processing for separation for a medical condition.  He was found qualified for separation with no defects or diagnoses.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009150



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009150



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019355

    Original file (20120019355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has not provided and the available records do not contain his medical and physical evaluation board proceedings. While the applicant contends that he should have been medically retired by reason of permanent physical disability due to PTSD, there appears to be no evidence to show this condition was such as to render him unfit for service at the time. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002888

    Original file (20140002888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would like the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to consider his case since the AFBCMR is sticking with their decision that his disabilities were caused while on active duty in the Army and must be considered by the Army. g. A letter from the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA), dated 6 August 2013, wherein he was advised that if he would like the ABCMR to review his discharge from the Army active service (7 April 1993 through 28 February 2006) and change it to a medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001802

    Original file (20130001802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He continued his rehabilitation and/or physical therapy until March 2010 when his leg went numb and he had severe back pain. The applicant contends he should have been diagnosed with the medical conditions of PTSD and TBI at the time of his disability retirement in April 2011 and thus awarded an additional finding of unfitness and compensation. In November 2010, an informal PEB found his back condition was unfitting and rated it as 40-percent disabling.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081070C070215

    Original file (2002081070C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 July 1955, the applicant was found guilty by a General Court-Martial for being AWOL from 23 April to 2 May 1955, and for being AWOL from 18 May to 1 June 1955. While trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged, and his conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, the possibility that the applicant suffered from PTSD, his 20 months of honorable service, and his combat service must also be considered in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003284

    Original file (20130003284.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A commander may approve separation under this chapter on the basis of other physical or mental conditions not amounting to disability and excluding conditions appropriate for separation processing under Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 5-11 or 5-13, that potentially interfere with assignment to or performance of duty. There is no evidence of record and he has not provided sufficient evidence that indicates his PTSD was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003297

    Original file (20150003297 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his service in Korea and Vietnam led to his post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In view of the foregoing, on 3 September 2014 the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to carefully consider the revised PTSD criteria, detailed medical considerations and mitigating factors when taking action on applications from former service members administratively discharged...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020668

    Original file (20120020668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she had the condition of major depressive disorder at the time of her discharge in 2003. e. The applicant has provided insufficient evidence that the condition of depressive disorder was unfitting at the time of her separation from the military in 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003890

    Original file (20140003890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a medical discharge. As a result his company commander initiated action to discharge him, the separation authority approved his discharge, and he was discharged accordingly on 4 May 2012. There is no evidence and he did not provide sufficient evidence to show his PTSD or any other medical condition was medically unfitting (in accordance with the standards of Army Regulation 40-501).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009364

    Original file (20120009364.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although his condition did not warrant a medical evaluation board (MEB), his psychiatric conditions were significantly impairing his ability to effectively perform his military duties. Paragraph 5-17, in effect at the time, provided that a Soldier could be separated for personality disorder, not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), which interfered with assignment to or performance of duty. The mental status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003053

    Original file (20140003053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In view of the foregoing, on 3 September 2014 the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to carefully consider the revised PTSD criteria, detailed medical considerations and mitigating factors when taking action on applications from former service members administratively discharged UOTHC and who have been diagnosed with PTSD by a competent mental health professional representing a...