Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009069
Original file (20120009069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  	

		BOARD DATE:	  3 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009069 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his campaign participation in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, his campaign participation while serving with the 156th Heavy Equipment Maintenance (HEM) Company, 80th Support Group, 1st Logistics Command, in Vietnam is not correctly shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and an extract from his 
DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 January 1967 and he held military occupational specialty 63H (Engine and Power Train Repairman).  He served in Vietnam with the 156th HEM Company from 
11 February 1968 through 22 January 1969.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 15 January 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He completed 3 years of net active service.

4.  His DD Form 214 also shows the:

* Vietnam Service Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device 
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

5.   Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.  His record is void of any convictions by a court-martial or a commander's disqualification for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  On 25 October 2010, he was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) which added the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his list of authorized awards.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance for the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states a bronze service star is authorized for each Vietnam campaign.  A review of his records shows that during his service in Vietnam he participated in the following four campaigns:

* Tet Counteroffensive
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase IV
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase V
* Vietnam counteroffensive Phase VI 


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his campaign participation in Vietnam.

2.  The evidence of record confirms that during his period of service in Vietnam he participated in four campaigns.  Therefore, he is entitled to wear four bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.

3.  The evidence of record shows he served honorably from 16 January 1967 through 15 January 1970.  He served in Vietnam and received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service.  His record is void of any disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

4.  In view of the foregoing, his request should be approved.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214
* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 16 January 1967 through 15 January 1970
* adding to his DD Form 214 the:


* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009069





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009069



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019064

    Original file (20100019064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 March 1972; and b. adding the following awards to item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 March 1972: * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * VSM with one silver service star * Expert Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009350

    Original file (20130009350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show: a. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 13 March 1967 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016523

    Original file (20100016523.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and he participated in four campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015465C070206

    Original file (20050015465C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record indicates at: a. item 31, service in Vietnam from 18 June 1968 through 8 June 1969; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments), service with the 335th Radio Research Company from 24 June 1968 through 29 September 1968 and the 156th Aviation Company, 224th Aviation Battalion in Vietnam from 3 October 1968 through 5 June 1969; c. item 39, service during four campaign periods; d. item 41 (Awards and Decorations), award of the Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017857

    Original file (20110017857.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and any other awards he is authorized. d. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal and correct his DD Form 214 to show the award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012681

    Original file (20140012681.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. He participated in four campaigns while serving in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show 4 bronze service stars affixed to his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021124

    Original file (20110021124.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Form 214 as follows: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 1 May 1967...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011367

    Original file (20120011367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. His unit in Vietnam was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of assignment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016469

    Original file (20110016469.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 February 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110016469 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal in addition to all the awards he is entitled to for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007667

    Original file (20130007667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and to correct DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that...