Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008778
Original file (20120008778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  27 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120008778 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier petition to the Board for medical retirement.  

2.  The applicant states the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has raised her percentage of disability for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) from 10 to 
30 percent (%) which was effective 5 July 2011 and her Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score is 60.  She states the Board indicated she never sought help for her PTSD while still on active duty but this is not true.  She claims that at her last duty assignment in Korea she made an appointment with a social worker in September or October 2008, and left Korea in November 2008.  

3.  The applicant provides an undated VA rating decision as new evidence in support of her request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110013527, on 7 February 2012.  

2.  During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence suggesting the applicant could not perform her military duties while on active duty, and as a result there was insufficient evidence to show a medical retirement was warranted.  
3.  The applicant submits an undated VA rating decision that shows her disability rating of 10% for PTSD was being raised to 30% effective 5 July 2011.  

4.  The applicant’s record shows she was honorably retired on 31 January 2009, in the grade of staff sergeant/E-6, after completing a total of 20 years, 1 month, and 26 days of active military service.  

5.  The applicant’s record is void of any medical treatment records indicating that she was suffering from a disabling mental or physical condition at the time of her retirement.  

6.  The record shows on 28 January and 13 July 2011, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch, denied the applicant’s requests for CRSC.  The reason for the original and final denials was the lack of documentary evidence showing an accident or incident connecting her disability to a combat-related event.  

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for
a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or
rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. It states that the mere presence of impairment does not, of itself, justify a finding of unfitness because of physical disability.  In each case, it is necessary to compare the nature and degree of physical disability present with the requirements of the duties the Soldier reasonably may be expected to perform because of his or her office, grade, or rank.  It states that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service.  When a Soldier is being processed for separation for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the Soldier is scheduled for separation or retirement indicates that a Soldier is fit.

9.  Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service. The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability/employability of the individual concerned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request for reconsideration of her earlier petition to the Board for medical retirement and the new evidence submitted has been carefully considered.  However, there remains insufficient evidence to support her claim.  

2.  The evidence of record and independent evidence submitted by the applicant fails to show she was unable to perform the duties of her grade and specialty.  As a result, absent any medical evidence confirming the applicant suffered from a disabling mental or physical condition that prevented her from performing her duties, there is insufficient evidence to support amendment of the original decision in this case.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110013527, dated 7 February 2012.



      _________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120008778



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120008778



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013527

    Original file (20110013527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows she was diagnosed with PTSD or any mental or medical condition prior to her retirement from active duty on 31 January 2009. She provided a DVA medical record, dated 16 April 2009, that shows she was diagnosed with PTSD, among other conditions. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005833

    Original file (20150005833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, especially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Although his records contain several Standard Forms 600 containing references to PTSD, his MEB NARSUM lists a diagnosis of anxiety disorder (not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021029

    Original file (20110021029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling. There is no evidence in the available records and she did not provide any evidence that shows she was diagnosed with a medical condition that rendered her physically unfit or unable to perform the duties required by her grade or military specialty, or would have warranted her entry into the Army's PDES at the time of her release from active duty. However, the applicant indicated in her request for CRSC that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014462

    Original file (20130014462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that her Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) award of service connection for PTSD and sleep apnea shows that these conditions were incurred while she was on active duty in Bosnia. The fact that a member may have incurred a disability during a period of war or in an area of armed conflict, or while participating in combat operations is not sufficient to support this finding. This incident, combined with the post-service medical evaluations, was sufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020504

    Original file (20110020504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * Army Board for Correction Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings Docket Number AR20100022702, dated 29 March 2011 * VA Rating Decision, dated 8 September 2011 * certificate from the VA, dated 10 September 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The VA Winston-Salem Regional Office transmittal letter, dated 10 August 2010, shows his service-connected disability rating of 100 percent for paranoid-type...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013801

    Original file (20140013801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show his post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a peptic ulcer were service-connected or combat-related for award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). He is requesting that the Boards review all of the evidence and grant his claim for PTSD and his ulcer condition under CRSC for hazardous service and/or simulating war. The PEB was approved on 18 December 1984. d. A DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013183

    Original file (20140013183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel's points of argument include: a. the Secretary of the Army may correct any military record when it is necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice; b. the Board begins its consideration with a presumption of administrative regularity; c. the applicant in this case has been the victim of material injustice by the Army; d. the applicant has served honorably as indicated by the decision rendered by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB); e. the applicant served in the Army for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015774

    Original file (20140015774.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel provides the following in his written brief, in effect stating: * the applicant filed an application for CRSC; after multiple decisions, HRC partially granted his request, but denied compensation for PTSD and tinnitus * the applicant served honorably in the Army, citing the four DD Forms 214 * he was referred into the Army's PDES and, on 29 August 2011, a formal PEB found his left knee injury and migraine headaches to be combat-related; he was medically retired on 29 January 2012 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015133

    Original file (20110015133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete service and/or VA medical records are not available for review with this case. Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling. The applicant has submitted evidence to show that his PTSD and foot injuries were service related.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006491

    Original file (20140006491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he has received a 70-percent disability rating from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and he has over 20 years of service * he left the service in the rank of private first class (PFC) on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) * he later enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve and Army National Guard (ARNG) and he was deployed under Title 10, U.S. Code, several times * no further service, injuries, or awards were entered in the retirement system upon his...