Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008686
Original file (20120008686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120008686 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was injured by rocket-propelled grenades and mortar fire during the Tet Offensive.  He contends that he was issued the Purple Heart, but he did not accept it due to his pride.  When the injury occurred, he did not think it was serious, but he started suffering from headaches, dizziness, nausea, and his neck was burning.  He states he later realized he incurred dents in his skull when he struck his head trying to find a bunker while under attack, but because of his youth at the time, he just tried to shake it off and move on.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

Counsel did not provide additional evidence or argument.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 May 1968. 
He was awarded military occupational specialty 71H (Personnel Specialist) upon completion of initial entry training.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 20 October 1968 through 1 October 1969.  Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show the Purple Heart.

4.  There is no evidence in his military records that indicates he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was treated for a combat-related wound.  He is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 8 May 1970.  His DD Form 214 does not include award of the Purple Heart.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart has been carefully considered.

2.  His DA Form 20 contains no entries indicating he was wounded in action and there is no evidence in his military records that indicates he was treated for a combat-related wound.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.  The regulation requires that substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the injury was the result of hostile action and that the injury required treatment by medical personnel.  In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis for award of the Purple Heart.

3.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120008686



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120008686



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080016915

    Original file (AR20080016915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence. A thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel records revealed that there are no orders in the applicant’s records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in item 40 or list the Purple Heart in item 41; the applicant's name is not listed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015989

    Original file (20110015989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that led to his alleged injury, or additional documentation that conclusively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010906

    Original file (20100010906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief. Army Regulation 600-8-22 specifies in order to support award of the Purple Heart, there must be evidence confirming the wound/injury for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action, the wound/injury required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022017

    Original file (20120022017.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in his military records that indicates he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was treated for a combat-related wound. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002119

    Original file (20120002119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA documents severe hearing loss in both ears and this condition has left him with poor communication skills which cannot be improved and has affected his employability since his return from Vietnam in 1970. c. A second self-authored statement, dated 22 December 2011, in which he describes two additional sapper attacks during his service in Vietnam. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000999

    Original file (20150000999.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued does not show award of the Purple Heart. There is no medical evidence in the applicant's available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action during his active duty service. In the absence of conclusive evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, regrettably, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis upon which to award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006160

    Original file (20140006160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded by shrapnel in combat in Vietnam. In order to request an award under Title 10 USC 1130, the applicant must submit a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award). Item 40 (Wounds) of his contemporaneous DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020636

    Original file (20100020636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart; his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster; his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds; and his medical records are not available for review with this case. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012641

    Original file (20110012641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states: a. the letter [previous proceedings] from the Board stated his records were lost in a fire; therefore, it couldn't be determined that his name was placed on the direct casualty roster for the Vietnam War; b. the entry "Dir Cas" [direct casualty] is recorded on the DA Form 8-275-3 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet) he provided; c. he provided quotes from the Admitting Officer who is a renowned physician in the field of Nephrology [study of kidneys] in Newark, NJ; d. he cited an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018325

    Original file (20140018325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Purple Heart. There is no medical evidence in the applicant's available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action during his active service. In the absence of the orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, regrettably, there is an insufficient...