Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007853
Original file (20120007853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    25 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007853 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states that when he was inducted into military service, he was given the Officer Candidate School (OCS) test and passed it.  He declined to attend OCS because he didn't want to make a career of military service.  After completing the engineer school, he was sent to Korea and assigned to the 65th Engineer Company.  He was assigned to the service bay and his team developed a reputation as excellent mechanics.  After a few months, he became the company clerk which required a Secret clearance.  He was proud of his service in that capacity and proud of his service to our country.  He was never reprimanded by anyone for any reason.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) and a photograph of his Honorable Discharge Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the applicant provided his DD Form 214 which is sufficient for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 September 1952 and entered active service on that date at St. Louis, MO.  This form does not show his military occupational specialty but shows his most significant duty assignment (i.e., his last duty assignment) was with the 65th Engineer Company, Korea. 

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 27 August 1954 in the rank/grade of corporal (CPL)/E-4 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 13 days of net active service of which 1 year, 3 months, and 10 days was foreign service, with no time lost.

5.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* United Nations Service Medal
* Korean Service Ribbon with one bronze service star
* Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation

6.  His DA Form 24 (Service Record) or DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which would have shown his conduct and efficiency ratings is not available for review with this case.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal requires that the Soldier received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and had no convictions by court-martial. 

2.  Although the applicant's service cannot be verified, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it can be presumed he served honorably throughout his service and had no court-martial convictions that precluded him from receiving this award as his DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty in the rank of CPL, had no time lost, served in the Korean War for over 1 year, and was transferred to the USAR.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him Army Good Conduct Medal and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 15 September 1952 through 27 August 1954
* adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019721



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007853



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011732

    Original file (20130011732.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant qualified for award of the National Defense Service Medal; b. the applicant qualified for award of the Korean Service Medal and he served in three campaigns during his service in Korea. Thus, he is entitled to three bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Korean Service Medal; c. the applicant qualified for award of the Republic of Korea War Service Medal; and d. general orders awarded the applicant's unit the ROK PUC. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011769

    Original file (20130011769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Regrettably, in the absence of evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005798

    Original file (20140005798.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * DD Forms 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), effective 21 February 1950 and 21 February 1953 * Battle Casualty Reports, Office of The Adjutant General of the Army, dated 11 September 1950, 11 October 1950, and 19 March 1951 * Casualty Reports, 65th Engineer Combat Construction Battalion, prepared on 12 March 1951 and 17 March 1951 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A WD AGO Form 0365 (Battle Casualty Report) filed on 13...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018212

    Original file (20130018212.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009921

    Original file (20090009921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. It would therefore be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and correct his records to show this award. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000164

    Original file (20120000164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * His DD Form 214 * A letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 19 December 2011 * A copy of an envelope * Orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed 1 year, 1 month, and 9 days of foreign service and his most significant duty assignment was with the 65th Engineer Combat Battalion, Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003271

    Original file (20140003271.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. His DD Form 214 shows: * he was promoted to the temporary rank of corporal on 11 November 1951 * he completed 11 months and 6 days of foreign service * he earned the following awards: * Korean Service Medal with 1 bronze service star * United Nations Service Medal * Army of Occupation Medal (Japan) 5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003620

    Original file (20080003620.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Authorized or Awarded) of his 30 June 1952 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected by adding the Army Good Conduct Medal, Korean Conflict Medal, Certificate of Achievement, and the Infantry 645th Engineer 5th Army Medal. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of his application. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081296C070215

    Original file (2002081296C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015432

    Original file (20130015432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 27 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he earned the following awards: * Korean Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars * United Nations Service Medal 6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 8 January 1951 through 8...