BOARD DATE: 5 February 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120007754
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he is eligible to retain his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB).
2. The applicant states the contract he signed for the CSRB does not state he would forfeit his bonus upon promotion or transfer from the Army National Guard (ARNG) to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). He contends he was told before his transfer to the USAR that his anniversary CSRB payment would not be affected by his transfer to the USAR to receive a promotion.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his written CSRB agreement, dated
13 March 2008.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. At the time of his application, the applicant was a major/O-4 in the USAR.
3. The CSRB agreement, dated 13 March 2008, as provided by the applicant, states:
a. Applicability: to be completed by all officers/warrant officers assigned to ARNG or USAR units with entitlement to a CSRB.
b. Service representative responsibility: to read and explain the CSRB requirements in the agreement.
c. Acknowledgment: in connection with the applicant's assignment to Company D, 1st Battalion, 185th Aviation, Mississippi ARNG (MSARNG), he initialed this acknowledgment that he would continue to serve in area of concentration (AOC) 92A, designated as a critical skill for a period of 3 years from the date of the agreement.
d. Obligation: the applicant indicated, by his initials, his acknowledgment and understanding that he must satisfactorily serve for a 3-year period in a CSRB designated critical skill, unless excused for the convenience of the Government.
e. Entitlement: the applicant indicated by his initials that payment of the CSRB would be made by his commander in accordance with the current CSRB guidance.
f. Continuation of Benefits: this section states that if the applicant is involuntarily transferred to another Selected Reserve unit within his component, because of unit transition, his entitlement to CSRB would continue.
g. Termination: this section states that entitlement to the CSRB would be terminated if he voluntarily transfers to a non-critical skill AOC, except to fulfill a promotion obligation.
h. Statement of Understanding: this section contains the applicant's signature indicating that he had read and understood each section of the agreement. He is identified as a captain. The document is certified and witnessed by two other Soldiers.
4. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Personnel Policy Division, National Guard Bureau (NGB). The opinion recommends disapproval of the applicant's request and offers the following discussion:
a. The applicant accepted a CSRB with the MSARNG on 13 March 2008. On 21 April 2008, he was transferred to the USAR to accept a promotion. At the time of the transfer, the applicant states he was told that his transfer would not have a negative effect on his anniversary payment. The applicant has since been told by the USAR that they are not obligated to fulfill his CSRB, due to the fact that the agreement was between him and the MSARNG.
b. Upon a joint review of the CSRB contract by both NGB and the MSARNG, it was agreed that the contract does not stipulate the applicant had to stay in the MSARNG to continue receiving the CSRB. However, the contract does state for benefits to continue, the transfer had to result from an involuntary transfer due to unit transition. In this case, the applicant voluntarily transferred in order to receive a promotion.
c. NGB determined, after reviewing the case, that it was likely the applicant was given wrong information during the time of his transfer from the MSARNG to the USAR. The applicant has stated he would not have transferred to the USAR if he had known he would lose the CSRB.
d. NGB further states that his CSRB was for a specific position in the MSARNG. Because he maintained the same critical skills AOC in the USAR, NGB recommends the USAR consider awarding him the CSRB.
5. On 27 November 2012, a copy of the advisory opinion was sent to the applicant for his information and opportunity to respond. No response was received.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he retained his eligibility for CSRB after his transfer to the USAR.
2. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant voluntarily transferred from the MSARNG to the USAR approximately 1 month after completing an agreement for CSRB with his MSARNG unit. Furthermore, a review of the terms written in the agreement, show no provisions allowing the applicant to retain his CSRB under the circumstances of his transfer to the USAR.
3. The applicant has not provided any documentary evidence showing he was misled or misinformed regarding the status of his CSRB as a result of his transfer.
4. It is clearly apparent that the promotion to major was the overriding factor in his decision to leave the MSARNG so soon after committing to the CSRB agreement. The applicant stated he would not have transferred to the USAR if he had known he would lose the CSRB. It is equally likely that had the MSARNG known he would transfer during the following month the MSARNG would not have agreed to the CSRB.
5. There is no apparent error or injustice in this case. Furthermore, if he is serving in the same critical skill, the USAR could consider him for the CSRB. However, the USAR may believe that his promotion to major was enough of an incentive.
6. In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__x___ __x______ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
________ _ x_______ ____
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007754
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007754
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021245
The exception to policy memorandum stated he: * had been issued a control number via Information Management and Reporting Center (iMARC) * executed a CSRB addendum for AOC 19A on 10 April 2008 * received the first installment of $10,000 on 15 May 2008 * the second installment was rejected because his AOC was not listed as a critical AOC on the NGB's approved list of AOCs that qualified for the bonus 21. The applicant's primary skill, 19A, was not a designated skill for the bonus and there...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016351
The applicant requests, in effect, approval of an exception to policy (ETP) allowing him to retain his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB). He provides: * self-authored memorandum, dated 30 August 2013 * Orders 317-1010, dated 12 November 2008 * Orders 216-1024, dated 4 August 2011 * Officer/Warrant Officer Written Agreement Army Reserve Components (RC) CSRB * NGB memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for Officer CSRB (Applicant), dated 1 July 2013 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009709
The applicant states: * he received an officer CSRB in 2008 while on Title 10 orders overseas * in late 2013 the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) was audited for administration of its bonus incentive program * he was notified that his bonus was to be recouped due to wording on his orders, lack of a bonus control number, and lack of dates on his contract * he was told to submit an exception to policy (ETP) to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) * NGB denied his request and provided a number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017840
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in area of concentration (AOC) 11A (Infantry) [or AOC 53A (Automation Officer)]. The applicant indicated that he was eligible for a CSRB and that he would complete 6 years of commissioned service on 8 March 2009; the applicant was advised that he did not have to wait until 8 March 2009 to complete the agreement; he was provided instructions to place his initials in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006765
b. Paragraph 6i states that officers who meet the qualification and who execute a 3-year CSRB contract and service agreement will be paid $20,000.00. c. The applicant signed a CSRB agreement with the Ohio ARNG on 2 November 2008 in critical AOC 19A. The issue is confusing because NGB says his agreement shows his bonus AOC as 19A and his command says his bonus AOC was 19B, but the CSRB contract does not list any AOC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020404
An NGB official stated although the applicant was eligible for the CSRB with the INARNG on 6 December 2008 in the critical AOC of 25A, he failed to sign a CSRB Written Agreement. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense memorandum, dated 12 December 2007, approved payment of bonus to ARNG and USAR officers who agree to serve in an active status for not less than 3 years in certain AOCs designated as critical for the CSRB in accordance with Title 37, U.S. Code, section 323. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021496
The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) for payment of the remaining $10,000.00 of his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) and relief from recoupment of the portion already paid. The applicant states: * he was in an eligible position and eligible for the CSRB in 2008 and the necessary documents were sent to his headquarters and he was paid the first half of the bonus * he inquired about the unpaid portion of the bonus years later and he was informed that a records review was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013345
After he received the first $10,000.00, he assumed all of the documentation for the CSRB anniversary payment was on file at both the unit and the State Incentive Office. The applicant signed a CSRB agreement with the UTARNG on 25 February 2008 in critical AOC 15B. Although an exception to policy was requested, the request for payment of the second installment of the CSRB in the amount of $10,000.00 was subsequently denied by NGB because the working copy of the CSRB agreement was filed in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013381
The applicant provides a memorandum, dated 4 November 2011, from the Deputy Chief of Staff, SCARNG, to the NGB, wherein he requested the applicant be granted an ETP for [receipt of the second installment] of the CSRB and stated both AOCs were entered on line 11 (of the CSRB written agreement) and the applicant had satisfied all requirements outlined in the contract. Notwithstanding his contention or the orders issued by the SCARNG showing the reason for his transfer to the 159th AV REG in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007314
The advisory official states in order to be eligible for the CSRB, ARNG officers must: a. be serving in the ARNG in the grade of captain (except for chaplains and Judge Advocates); b. have completed any current contractual obligation or bonus contract as a result of participation in either the Officer Accession or Affiliation Bonus; c. be fully qualified in one of the designated critical skills and extend in an Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTO&E) or "deployable" Table of...