BOARD DATE: 8 November 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120007411
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of her uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge.
2. The applicant states she received an Honorable Discharge Certificate in 2002. It was lost in their move to Indiana. She completed basic combat training and advanced individual training. She successfully completed training and graduated from the 91B (Medical Specialist) military occupational specialty. She received a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) but it has changed from honorable to uncharacterized. She works for the U.S. Navy and she needs the veteran preference for her position.
3. The applicant provides her DD Forms 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records are not available to the Board for review. However, the applicant provided a sufficient document (DD Form 214) for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.
3. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of 8 years on 27 January 1994.
4. She entered initial active duty for training (ADT) on 18 February 1994. She completed basic combat and advanced individual training and at the completion of training she was awarded military occupational specialty 91B.
5. She was released from ADT to the control of her USAR unit on 12 August 1994 by reason of completion of ADT. Her DD Form 214 shows she completed 5 months and 25 days of active service. Item 24 (Character of Service) of this form shows the entry "Uncharacterized."
6. The complete details of her USAR service are not available for review with this case. However, she appears to have been honorably discharged from the USAR on or around 26 January 2002, at the conclusion of her military service obligation.
7. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3 of that regulation describes the different types of characterization of service. It states in pertinent part that an uncharacterized separation is an entry-level separation. A separation will be described as an entry-level separation if processing is initiated while a member is in entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable condition is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case or when the Secretary of the Army, on a case-by-case basis, determines that characterization of service as Honorable is clearly warranted by the presence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance of duty. Entry level status begins on enlistment in the Army National Guard or the USAR and, for Soldiers ordered to initial ADT for one continuous period, ends 180 days after beginning training.
8. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
9. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her active military service. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service. A DD Form 214 will be prepared for each Soldier as indicated:
a. Active Army Soldiers on termination of active duty by reason of administrative separation (including separation by reason of retirement or expiration of term of service), physical disability separation, or punitive discharge under the Uniform Code of Military Justice;
b. Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous ADT, Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service. Also, RC Soldiers separated for cause or physical disability regardless of the length of time served on active duty;
c. Army National Guard (ARNG) and USAR Soldiers mobilized under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 12301(a), 12302, or 12304, and ARNG Soldiers called into Federal service under Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 15 or section 12406, regardless of length of mobilization, when transitioned from active duty. A Soldier who reports to a mobilization station and is found unqualified for active duty will be excluded from this provision. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and
d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days. This includes completion of advanced individual training under the ARNG of the United States Alternate Training Program or USAR Split Training Program
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant entered ADT on 18 February 1994 and she was released from ADT on 12 August 1994. She completed 5 months and 25 days of active service and she received an uncharacterized discharge.
2. During the first 180 days of continuous active military service, a member's service is under review. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable conditions discharge. An honorable characterization may be given only if the service clearly warrants that characterization by unusual circumstances of personal conduct and performance of military duty and is approved by the Secretary of the Army.
3. The entry-level separation, also known as uncharacterized, is given regardless of the reason for separation. This uncharacterized discharge is neither positive nor negative; it is not "derogatory." It simply means the Soldier did not serve long enough to qualify for a specified characterization of service.
4. The applicant received the appropriate character of service and he has provided no evidence to show it is in error or unjust. Therefore, there is no basis for granting his requested relief.
5. Aside from her active service from February to August 1994, there is no evidence she performed any other period of active duty of at least 90 consecutive days which would have qualified her for the issuance of a DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.
6. The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits. Since there is neither an error nor an injustice, there is insufficient evidence to grant her the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x_ __x______ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007411
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007411
5
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023247
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized * her total service to include her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) inactive duty training and annual training * her rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2 * her actual duty served 2. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021040
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to amend item 24 (Character of Service) to show she received an honorable discharge. It specifies that Soldiers of the USAR ordered to AD for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from AD, revert to control of the appropriate RC and the service of Soldiers specified in this paragraph who are in an entry-level status will be uncharacterized, even though they have completed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020878
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 6 August 1985 to show her character of service as "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." He or she will only receive a DD Form 220; and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001578
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 4 March 1995 to show: * the character of service as "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized" * he completed his first full term of service 2. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220; and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days. When he was released from active duty, he had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009947
The applicant provides copies of her DD Forms 214, her discharge orders from the USAR, and her request for release from the USAR. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. Therefore, the applicant's first DD Form 214 was properly prepared to reflect her ADT service as being uncharacterized and the applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with her application...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008847
The applicant requests her uncharacterized discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be changed to honorable or a general discharge. A memorandum, dated 7 September 1995, shows the applicant was notified of her pending USAR discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5. There is no evidence that indicates she was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed their military term of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502
Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838
Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Entry-level status for such a member of an RC terminates as follows: (1) 180 days after beginning training if the member is ordered to active duty for training (ADT) for one continuous period of 180 days or more; or (b) 90 days after the beginning of the second period of ADT if the member is ordered to ADT under a program that splits the training into two or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070013838 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. She entered initial active duty training (IADT) on 14 October 1988 and was relieved from IADT on 4 March 1989 after completing 4 months and 21 days of active service. Department of Defense Directive 1332.14...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001858
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he received an honorable instead of an uncharacterized characterization of service. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days. Aside from his ADT from September June to August 1996 for which a DD Form 214 was issued, there...