Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006798
Original file (20120006798.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120006798 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  The applicant states he received the Bronze Star Medal in connection with ground operations [in Vietnam] during 1966 to 1967.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214, a certificate, and a citation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 June 1965 and he held military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He served in Vietnam from 16 April 1966 to 13 April 1967 while assigned to Company C, 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment.

3.  General Orders (GO) Number 1489, dated 24 April 1967, issued by Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, awarded him the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service from April 1966 to March 1967.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 13 April 1967 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He completed 1 year, 9 months, and 19 days of creditable active service with no time lost.

5.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)

6.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.  

7.  His record is void of any derogatory information, convictions by a court-martial, or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance for the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  A review of his records shows that during his service in Vietnam he participated in two campaigns.

10.  Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry was cited for award of the:

* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 April 1966 through 1 August 1968, by DAGO Number 48, dated 1971
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 30 April 1966 through 21 January 1970, by DAGO Number 51, dated 1971

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, which is not shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

2.  The evidence of record confirms he served honorably from 25 June 1965 through 13 April 1967.  He served in Vietnam and received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service.  His record is void of any derogatory information that would have disqualified him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).  Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him this medal and to correct his DD Form 214 accordingly.

3.  His record confirms he participated in two campaigns during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 accordingly.

4.  General orders awarded his unit the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit; neither of which are shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 25 June 1965 through 13 April 1967
* deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal
* adding to his DD Form 214 the:

* Bronze Star Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006798





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006798



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019525

    Original file (20110019525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 7 June 1963 and 13 September 1968 * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center * Citation for award of the Bronze Star Medal * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DA Form 24 (Service Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Deleting from his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009113

    Original file (20080009113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, Item 38 (Record of Assignment) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant’s conduct and efficiency ratings were “Excellent” throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022067

    Original file (20110022067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars; and c. Adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Valorous Unit Award * Meritorious Unit Commendation *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005931

    Original file (20130005931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was awarded or authorized the: * Bronze Star Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) 4. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 30 August 1966 through 29 August 1968 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027443

    Original file (20100027443.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Records) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service. Therefore, he is entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 December 1966 through 11 December 1968 and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011485

    Original file (20130011485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 20 April 1966 through 19 April 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence shows he participated in two campaigns during his service in Vietnam which entitles him to two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028797

    Original file (20100028797.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013340

    Original file (20140013340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This qualifies him for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026733

    Original file (20100026733.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 7 September 1966 to 20 June 1968, based on his conduct and efficiency ratings and overall record of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 7 September 1966 to 20 June 1968 and amending his DD Form 214 to delete the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025513

    Original file (20100025513.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * His DD Form 214 does not show the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device or the Purple Heart * Orders for the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device indicate he was wounded in the left leg 3. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1...