Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006336
Original file (20120006336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  25 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120006336 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his eligible family members were listed in the official Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) online database and that he be allowed to transfer his GI Bill educational benefits to his eligible family members under the Post 9/11 GI Bill transferability option.

2.  The applicant states he was on active duty in the U.S. Army on and after
1 August 2009 and he met the criteria for the Post 9/11 GI Bill transferability option.  At the time, his family members were enrolled in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) and eligible for the TEB.

   a.  He left active service within the first 90 days of implementation of the Post 9/11 GI Bill program.  During out-processing, he wasn't briefed on the program nor asked about transferring his educational benefits to his dependents.  He retired from active duty on 31 August 2009.

   b.  Shortly after retiring from active duty, he learned that he was eligible to transfer his educational benefits.  He contacted TEB officials and was told that he was not eligible to transfer his benefits to his spouse because she was not in DEERS, so he abandoned his efforts.

   c.  He recently completed his Master's Degree and a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) counselor discovered that he was being paid educational benefits based on being in an active duty status rather than a retired status.  The VA reimbursed him for the monetary difference and the counselor advised him that he should pursue transferring his remaining educational benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his request, a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant had prior honorable enlisted service in the U.S. Army Reserve from 28 May 1986 through 21 November 1988.  He also had prior honorable active duty enlisted service in the Regular Army from 22 November 1988 through 2 August 1996 and from 8 April 1997 through 20 May 2003.

2.  He was appointed as a Reserve warrant officer in the U.S. Army and entered active duty on 21 May 2003.  He was promoted to chief warrant officer two (CW2)/pay grade W-2 on 21 May 2005.

3.  U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, U.S. Army Field Support Center, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, Orders 091-04, dated 1 April 2009, show the applicant was assigned to the U.S. Army Element Defense Attaché System, Defense Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC, with duty U.S. Defense Attaché Office, Nicaragua.  The orders reassigned him to the U.S. Army Transition Center, Fort Belvoir Virginia, with a reporting date of 1 June 2009, for separation processing.

4.  A DD Form 214 shows the applicant was honorably retired from active duty on 31 August 2009.  He completed 6 years, 3 months, and 10 days of net active service this period; 16 years, 1 month, and 2 days of total prior active service; and 22 years, 4 months, and 12 days of total active service.

5.  There is no evidence that the applicant's dependents made a previous claim to the VA for educational benefits.

6.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Education Incentives Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, Kentucky.

	a.  The advisory official recommends administrative relief for the applicant.

   b.  The advisory official notes the applicant was eligible to transfer benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill transferability program. 
   
    	(1)  He was on active duty on 1 August 2009 and his last day of active duty service was 31 August 2009.
   
    	(2)  He had at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to his spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer educational benefits to eligible children.
   
    	(3)  He was eligible to transfer his educational benefits to the following family members who were enrolled in DEERS:  Erin E. K____ (spouse), Amber N. K____ (child), and Summer S. Y____ (child), all of whom were enrolled in DEERS.

	 	(4)  He was eligible to transfer educational benefits to them, if he completed the request before leaving military service; however, he did not.

	c.  The advisory official notes the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, and the VA initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  Information on the Post 9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of entitlements was published well in advance of the implementation date of 1 August 2009.
   
    	(1)  The applicant began an extended period of absence on or about
1 June 2009, which was prior to his retirement date (of 31 August 2009) and claims he was not aware of the requirement to transfer his educational benefits prior to leaving service.

    	(2)  The advisory official adds that, although significant measures were taken to disseminate information, many Soldiers who left service during the first 90 days of the program were not aware of the requirement to transfer their benefits prior to leaving military service.

   d.  The VA is restricted to pay for educational benefits by compensating no more than one (1) retroactive year from the date a claim is received by the VA.  

7.  On 14 May 2012, the applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion in order to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  To date, the applicant has not provided a response.

8.  Public Law 110-252 (Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008) provides the authority for members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 to transfer unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The Public Law amended
Title 10 (Armed Forces), U.S. Code, chapter 1606, section 16132a, to show that subject to regulation prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary concerned may permit a member who is entitled to basic educational assistance under this chapter to elect to transfer entitlement to unused educational benefits to one or more of the specified family members.

	a.  An eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, has completed at least:

		(1)  6 years of service in the armed forces and enters into an agreement to serve at least 4 more years as a member of the Armed Forces; or

		(2)  the years of service as determined in Army regulations and established by the Secretary of the Army.

   b.  An individual approved to transfer an entitlement to educational assistance under this section may transfer the individual's entitlement, as follows:
   
		(1)  to the individual's spouse;

		(2)  to one or more of the individual's children; or

		(3)  to a combination of the individuals identified above.

	c.  To satisfy this legally imposed constraint, a child must be an eligible family member at the time of transfer.  To be considered an eligible family member, a child must be enrolled in DEERS and eligible for DEERS benefits.

		(1)  Children lose eligible family member status upon turning age 21, or at marriage;

		(2)  Eligible dependent status can be extended from age 21 to age 23 only if the child is enrolled as a full-time student and unmarried, as verified by DEERS; and

		(3)  Family member children can use transferred benefits up to age 26.

	d.  Provided the service member allocates at least 1 month of benefits to an eligible family member prior to separation, changes to the amount of months allocated to eligible family members can be made at any time, to include after leaving military service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program prior to retirement.

2.  He was eligible to transfer his educational benefits to the following family members who were enrolled in DEERS:  Erin E. K____ (spouse), Amber N. K____ (child), and Summer S. Y____ (child), all of whom were enrolled in DEERS.

3.  The advisory opinion points out many Soldiers who left the service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer Post 9/11 benefits prior to leaving military service.

4.  The applicant began an extended period of absence on or about 1 June 2009, which was within 90 days of the program's implementation date, and he retired from active duty on 31 August 2009.  Thus, he may not have been aware of the requirement to transfer his benefits prior to leaving military service.  

5.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his military records to show he elected to transfer benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to his eligible dependents prior to his retirement date.

BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  ___x_____  ___x_  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his military records to show he filed his application and the Army 


approved his request to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his family members prior to his retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met. 



      _______ _  x _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006336



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006336



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006854

    Original file (20120006854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 23 years of service upon his transfer from the Selected Reserve to the Retired Reserve, so he was eligible to transfer benefits to either his spouse or children if he completed the request before leaving military service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits by law because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007441

    Original file (20120007441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer benefits to eligible children. The applicant had more than 21 years of service upon his retirement, so he was eligible to transfer benefits to either his spouse or children if he had completed the request before leaving military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014210

    Original file (20110014210.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his eligible family members were listed in the official Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) online database and to transfer his GI Bill educational benefits to his eligible family members under the Post 9/11 GI Bill transferability option. The evidence of record shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program prior to his retirement. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018851

    Original file (20110018851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program prior to his retirement. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his military records to show he elected to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to his eligible family member (spouse) prior to his retirement date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004420

    Original file (20110004420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his eligible family members were listed in the official Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) online database and to transfer his GI Bill educational benefits to his eligible family members under the Post 9/11 GI Bill transferability option. The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant was a member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty on or after 1 August 2009; b. he had at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008021

    Original file (20120008021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was uninformed that education benefits must be transferred to dependents before they reached 23 years of age * his oldest child, his daughter Natasha, reached 23 years of age on 13 January 2012 * he attempted to transfer his benefits to her on 12 April 2012 * Natasha was displayed on the Post-9/11 GI Bill website, yet labeled ineligible * information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill website states dependents can use transferred benefits between 18 and 26 years of age * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019459

    Original file (20110019459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By Public Law 110-252, only eligible children and/or spouses enrolled in DEERS are eligible to receive the transferred benefits and the Soldier must transfer the benefits while a member of the Selected Reserve or a Regular Army Soldier. There is no evidence the applicant took all necessary steps to ensure the adopted child was enrolled in DEERS during the period the applicant was eligible for the transfer and he attempted to transfer the benefit prior to leaving active or Reserve military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021622

    Original file (20140021622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the step-daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to her. The FSM died from cancer on 11 September 2013. c. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) told the applicant's mother that the FSM only transferred 1 month of educational benefits. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023429

    Original file (20110023429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His son's Kansas University ID card, issued 6 September 2011, and University of Kansas transcripts, dated 18 November 2011, show the applicant's son attended the university from Fall 2005 though Fall 2011. c. A VA letter, dated 22 September 2011, informed the applicant's son that his application for benefits was received by the VA. d. Email messages, subject: Transfer of Benefits Problems, show: (1) on 12 November 2011, the applicant contacted the Army G-1 and presented the issue he now...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009844

    Original file (20120009844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval to transfer 1 month of her educational benefits to two additional dependent children, J____ M____ and A____ M____, under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 April 2010. It is apparent she was aware of the requirement to request TEB through the DOD TEB online database prior to her transfer to the Retired Reserve as she transferred...