Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006313
Original file (20120006313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120006313 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the BSM for meritorious achievement and believes it should be shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* DD Form 214
* Award Certificate for the BSM

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  Evidence of record and background information:

	a.  On 21 April 1970, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 31S (Field General Communications/Security Maintenance).

	b.  On 4 December 1970, he departed Fort Monmouth, New Jersey for duty in the RVN.

	c.  On 7 January 1971, he was assigned for duty with the U.S. Army Strategic Command, Signal Support.

	d.  On 1 March 1971, he was reassigned within his unit to duties as a legal clerk and was subsequently reclassified into MOS 71D (Legal Specialist).

	e.  He returned to the United States on or about 9 December 1971.

	f.  On 8 December 1971, he was released from active duty.  He had attained the rank of specialist six, pay grade E-6 and had completed 1 year, 7 months, and 18 days of creditable active duty service.

	g.  His DD Form 214 lists his awards as:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Commendation Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* One Overseas Service Bar
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the same awards listed on his DD Form 214.

4.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), failed to reveal any orders awarding the applicant the BSM.  ADCARS is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command.



5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged n military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

6.  The certificate provided by the applicant indicates that he was awarded the BSM for outstanding meritorious achievement in ground operations against hostile forces during the period 1 February to 29 November 1971.  This certificate does not identify the orders authorizing this medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the BSM.

2.  There are no available general orders showing the applicant was awarded the BSM.  The certificate provided by the applicant is insufficient evidence by itself upon which to base a correction of his records.  

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



________ _   __x_____   ____
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006313





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006313



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022171

    Original file (20100022171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any orders or documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service. There are no available general orders showing the applicant was awarded the BSM by the appropriate award authority. The applicant's DA Form 20 documents the BSM and ARCOM on the same entry; however, the BSM is lined through.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022833

    Original file (20110022833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Table B-1 of the awards regulation contains a list of campaigns and shows that during the applicant’s tenure of assignment in the RVN, participation credit was granted for the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970- 30 June 1971) and Consolidation I (1 July-30 November 1971) campaigns. The applicant’s request to correct his DD Form 214 to show he served in MOS 67U in the RVN has also been carefully considered. While the awards and other orders provided by the applicant seem to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009406

    Original file (20080009406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of a BSM Citation, which shows he was awarded the BSM for his meritorious service in the RVN during the period June 1970 through April 1971. The applicant's record also confirms that he received "Excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for exemplary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012603

    Original file (20130012603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 214 (copy 1) * DA Form 759 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate - Army), for the period from November 1970 to February 1971 * Certificate for award of the ARCOM with 3rd OLC for the period April 1969 to December 1970, dated 19 December 1970 * General Orders Number 3104, dated 17 February 1971, announcing award of the BSM for the period 16 February 1970 to 15 February 1971 (This order contains a hand-lettered entry indicating the order...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006063

    Original file (20120006063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. he was awarded the ARCOM on 10 March 1970; however it is not recorded on his DD Form 214; b. two days prior to leaving Vietnam, he was awarded the BSM containing the statement "orders to follow"; c. while he received the actual BSM, he never received the order; and d. he recently learned that subsequent to his active duty service, his unit was authorized and awarded two VUAs and the RVNGC during his period of service with that unit. His DD Form 214 issued on 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010233C080407

    Original file (20070010233C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's MPRJ is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving on active duty. The applicant's record is void of any orders, documents, or an award recommendation that shows he was ever recommended for the BSM while serving on active duty. The evidence of record also shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the applicant is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021667

    Original file (20110021667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency rating during his active duty service; there is no evidence of any disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification for the Army Good Conduct Medal; he attained the rank of sergeant (SGT); and he received multiple awards for meritorious service and achievement, and one for valor. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 22 June 1968 through 12 December 1969 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010053

    Original file (20110010053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in his military records showing he was awarded the BSM. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar * Vietnam Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * RVN Campaign Medal * one Overseas Service Bar 8. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005258

    Original file (20110005258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). General Orders Number 1066, 1st Cavalry Division, dated 26 January 1969, awarded him the 1st through 20th Oak Leaf Cluster for the AM for the period 24 March through 7 November 1968. c. Special Orders Number 76, Fort Hood, Texas, dated 6 November 1969, awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016562

    Original file (20080016562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080016562 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Vietnam Combat Medal and all other awards to which he may be entitled. The applicant's record contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM or the...