IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 17 July 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120006040
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests cancellation of her enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984 (MGIB) and enrollment in the Loan Repayment Program (hereafter referred to as the Loan Repayment Program (LRP)).
2. She states she was improperly briefed on the MGIB which has resulted in her ineligibility for the LRP. She contends that she was not aware that signing the MGIB addendum would cancel her entitlement to the LRP.
3. She indicates she joined the military for several reasons, but one of the incentives was to have her student loans repaid. She was told she qualified for the MGIB and if she wanted to pursue a second degree, she could enroll. She signed the form believing that she still would receive payments toward her student loan debt.
4. The applicant states she was not informed that once she enrolled in the MGIB she would be ineligible for the LRP. She reiterates that the purpose of enlisting in the U.S. Army was first to serve her country and second to participate in the incentives of the LRP.
5. She provides:
* DD Form 2366 (MGIB Basic Enrollment)
* DA Form 3286 (Statement for Enlistment U.S. Army Enlistment Program U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment/Entry Program (DEP) (Annex A))
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 15 July 2010 for a period of 8 years. Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States) indicates she understood she was joining the DEP for the purpose of enlistment in the Regular Army on 24 November 2010. Item 8c of this form also contains the statement, "The agreements in this section and attached annex(es) are all the promises made to me by the Government. ANYTHING ELSE ANYONE HAS PROMISED ME IS NOT VALID AND WILL NOT BE HONORED." She biometrically signed this section of the contract.
2. She was discharged from the DEP on 21 November 2010 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 November 2010. Item F (Discharge from/Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program) of the DD Form 4 shows that no changes had been made to her enlistment options or if changes were made, they were recorded on annex B which replaced annex A of her addenda. She biometrically signed this section of the form.
3. She provides a DA Form 3286 (Annex A), dated 15 July 2010. This document shows she enlisted under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) for Program 9A, U.S. Army Training Enlistment Program (UNCM), Option 03. Her incentive was attendance for training in military occupational specialty 35W (Electronic Warfare Signal Intelligence Recruit) with special qualification identifier L (Linguist). No other programs were listed.
4. Her record contains a second DA Form 3286 (Annex B), dated 22 November 2010. No other incentives or programs were added to annex A, dated 15 July 2010.
5. The DD Form 2366 the applicant provides shows, in part, she agreed to the following under Item 3 (Statement of Understanding for All Eligible Members):
a. "I am automatically enrolled unless I exercise the option to DISENROLL by signing Item 5 below."
b. "I understand that UNLESS I DISENROLL from the MGIB my basic pay will be reduced $100.00 per month or the current monthly rate until $1,200.00 has been deducted; this basic pay reduction CANNOT be REFUNDED, SUSPENDED, OR STOPPED. This is an IRREVOCABLE DECISION."
6. She signed this section of the form on 15 July 2010.
7. Item 5 (Statement of Disenrollment) of the same DD Form 2366 does not indicate she chose disenrollment from the MGIB.
8. Her record is void of any documentation which shows she enrolled in the LRP at any time during her enlistment process.
9. During the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Army G-1, dated 6 April 2012. The Chief, Incentives and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division, wrote:
a. The Soldier enlisted in the Army on 15 July 2010 and went on active duty on 22 November 2010. Her contract at enlistment contained no enlistment incentives since she had an Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT) score of 49 (Category I-IIIB).
b. All incentives for enlistment, including the LRP at the time the applicant joined the Army, were restricted to test Category I-IIIA or higher (AFQT of 50 or higher). As a result, she would not have been offered the LRP option or any bonus options.
c. Recommend that relief be denied since the applicant did not qualify for the requested incentive.
10. The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for comment or rebuttal; however, she did not reply.
11. Army Regulation 601-210 prescribes eligibility criteria governing the enlistment of persons, with or without prior service, into the Regular Army and the USAR. Chapter 9 (Enlistment Programs/Options) states that these programs/options are designed to merge valid Army requirements with personal desires.
12. Army Regulation 601-210, Table 9-4, contains guidance on enlistment option program 9C (Bonus/Army College Fund/Loan Repayment Program). Table 9-4 provides program processing procedures that require specific counseling and administrative actions in connection with processing members enlisting with the LRP incentive. In addition, line 7 of table 9-4 requires the guidance counselor to verify that the applicant has qualifying loans if enlisting for the LRP, to advise the applicant if any loan is not eligible, and to have the applicant acknowledge same in the remarks section of the DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing Armed Forces of the United States) series.
13. The LRP is a Department of the Army enlistment option authorized by Public Law 99-145. This option is designed to increase Test Score Category I-IIIA accessions.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request to allow her to disenroll from the MGIB for the purpose of enrolling in the LRP was carefully considered. She contends she was not properly informed that her enrollment in the MGIB would cancel her entitlement to receive the LRP.
2. The available evidence shows she signed a DD Form 2366 in which she enrolled in the MGIB Program. She has not provided sufficient evidence and her record is void of any evidence that shows she enrolled in the LRP or that she was not properly counseled regarding her LRP options at the time of her enlistment.
3. Public Law 99-145 designed the LRP as an incentive to increase the number of Category I-IIIA applicants. An advisory option from the Army G-1 Enlisted Accessions Division Incentives and Budget Branch shows she did not qualify for the LRP at the time of her enlistment.
4. By law, the required test score must have been 50 or higher on the AFQT in order to be considered a Category I-IIIA applicant. She scored 49 on the AFQT which placed her in Category I-IIIB, thus making her ineligible to receive any incentives, specifically the LRP.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no error or injustice as it pertains to the applicant's enlistment contract. Therefore, she is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X ___ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120006040
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120006040
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061238C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted under the LRP and had acquired two student loans prior to her entry on active duty. Therefore, the Army is not authorized to repay the applicant’s student loans.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081923C070215
Item 32a, Specific Option/Program Enlisted For (Completed by Guidance Counselor, MEPS Liaison NCO, etc., as specified by sponsoring service) of the applicant's DD Form 1966/3 shows that, among other programs, she also enlisted for the Student Loan Repayment Program. She placed her initials by the block, "I understand that under the Army's Student Loan Repayment Program, the Army will not repay student loans in excess of $65,000 regardless of the amount of my student loans. The applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087287C070212
if enlisting for the LRP [Loan Repayment Program], disenroll the applicant or soldier from the GI Bill; and c.) verify that the applicant has qualifying loans if enlisting for the LRP. Wide discretions are available to this Board under Title 10, US Code, Section 1552, which includes the authority to amend the applicant’s DA Form 3286-66 to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000302C070208
The applicant states that her recruiter and the MEPS counselor told her that the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) would pay for both her loans. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show her DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and such...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007087
The DD Form 1966 and DA Form 3286 completed when she enlisted in the DEP show she acknowledged she was enlisting for program 9A (U.S. Army Training Enlistment Program), option 3, for training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 68W (Health Care Specialist). She provided the following documentation in support of her application: a. a USAREC Form 1232 signed by her and a guidance counselor on 16 August 2011 which shows she indicated she understood, in part: * she must disenroll from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010272C070205
After filing his DD Form 2475, DOD Educational Loan Repayment Program (LRP) Annual Application, he was informed that his loan did not qualify for repayment. (Specific Option/Program Enlisted For), of the same DD Form 1966/3 shows the applicant enlisted for, among other options/incentives, payment of his student loan under the LRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending the DA Form 3286 to include...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059257C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063819C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061237C070421
The letter also stated that after reviewing the applicant’s DD Form 2475 from the SMSC, it was determined that his loan did not qualify for repayment under the LRP. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted under the LRP and acquired a student loan prior to his entry on active duty. Therefore, the Army is not authorized to repay the applicant’s student loan.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011494
He also acknowledged he understood only certain loans qualify for the LRP program and that the government will repay a designated portion of any loan he incurred that was made, insured or guaranteed under Part B of the Higher Education Act (Guaranteed Student Loan) or any loan under Part E of such act (National Direct Student Loan) after 1 October 1975 and before he enlisted in the Army. The applicant enlisted with the LRP as a part of his Regular Army contract and disenrolled from the...