Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006010
Original file (20120006010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  2 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120006010 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his rank be changed to sergeant/E-5 on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states:

* He made temporary E-5 and promised permanent E-5 by his company commander after a field exercise
* The company commander never followed through
* he was an excellent Soldier

3.  The applicant provides:

* Honorable Discharge Certificate
* Photographs of a Soldier, uniform patch, and medal 
* Appointment orders, dated 31 March 1967
* Discharge orders
* Orders for the Expert Badge with Rifle and 1st Class Gunner Badge
* Period Ten Scorecard
* Article from the 48th Infantry Band G's Epitaph

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 October 1966.  He served as a light weapons infantryman in Germany and he was honorably released from active duty on 18 September 1968 in the temporary rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.

3.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) the entry "SP4 (T) (temporary) SEE (item) 30"
* Item 5b (Pay Grade) the entry "E4"
* Item 6 (Date of Rank) the entry "10 APR (April)  (19)68"
* Item 30 (Remarks) the entry "Item 5A DATE OF APT (appointment) PFC  (P) (permanent) E-3 31 MAR (March) (19)67" 

4.  Unit orders, dated 8 August 1968, show he was appointed to the temporary grade of acting sergeant/E-5 by his company commander. 

5.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 shows he was:

* appointed to E-3 (P) effective 31 March 1967
* appointed to appointed to E-4 (T) effective 10 April 1968
* appointed to acting sergeant E-5 (T) effective 8 August 1968

6.  There is no evidence of record which shows he was recommended for promotion to E-5 by a promotion selection board and placed on a recommended promotion list prior to his release from active duty on 18 September 1968.

7.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), in effect at the time, stated recommendation by a promotion selection board and placement on a permanent recommended promotion list was required for all promotions to sergeant and staff sergeant.  It also stated the promotion authority for these ranks was a field grade commander.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contention he made temporary E-5 and was promised permanent E-5 by his company commander was noted.  However, an acting order is not a promotion order.  Since there is no evidence of record which shows he was recommended for promotion to E-5 by a promotion selection board and placed on a recommended promotion list prior to his release from active duty on
18 September 1968, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant his request to change his rank to E-5 on his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X __  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006010





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006010



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000933

    Original file (20140000933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held the permanent rank of PFC at the time of separation and the temporary rank of SP4/E-4. Unfortunately, there is no evidence in his records and he provides none of such promise. It is possible he performed the duties of a CPL during the stated period; however, in the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence confirming appointment or promotion to CPL, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show the rank he held on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017258

    Original file (20130017258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was placed on the promotion list before his separation. On 4 August 1971, Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, published Special Orders Number 216 releasing him from active duty effective 4 August 1971. Absent the publication of the promotion instrument - a promotion order - there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006018

    Original file (20110006018.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 April 1969, the U.S. Army Field Artillery Center, Fort Sill, OK, published Special Orders Number 94 ordering his separation from the Regular Army, effective 25 April 1969. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a cross-reference. However, on 19 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008184

    Original file (20120008184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show his pay grade as E-5. The applicant states he should have been awarded the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019085

    Original file (20100019085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and that he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 29 (Qualification in Arms)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004703

    Original file (20110004703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 October 1968, while in Vietnam, Special Orders Number 277, issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, appointing him to the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 (Permanent (P)). On 29 October 1969, Special Orders Number 302, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, ordered his release from active duty effective 29 October 1969. Army Regulation 600-200 also states the temporary appointment of Regular Army enlisted personnel in grade in which computed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008507

    Original file (20120008507.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 January 1967. While in Vietnam: * he was issued a certificate that shows he completed the Lightning Combat Leaders Course from 19 to 27 August 1967 * Unit orders Number 49, issued by Headquarters, 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry, on 5 August 1967 promoted him to the permanent (P) rank/grade of private first class/E-3 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016246

    Original file (20130016246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, since there is no evidence of record which shows he was recommended for promotion to E-5 by a promotion selection board and placed on a permanent recommended promotion list prior to his release from active duty on 22 July 1969, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant his request for a promotion to E-5. His service record is void of evidence which shows he was promoted to the permanent rank of SP4/E-4 prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000752

    Original file (20120000752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant provides: * Unit Orders Number 21, issued by Company C, 508th Military Police Battalion, Fort Riley, KS, dated 18 March 1970 * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends his military service records should be corrected to show he was promoted to SGT/E-5.