Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005599
Original file (20120005599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120005599 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states that his records are right.  He has grown and understands the errors of his youth and has been trying to get his life and past actions to be as the man he is today.  He was very young and not mature enough to be responsible for his actions or care about his future.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA), in pay grade E-1, on 6 August 1975, for 3 years.  On the date of his enlistment in the RA, he was 18 years and 8 months of age.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 17B (Field Artillery Radar Crewman).  He was advanced to pay grade E-2 on 6 December 1975.  He served in Germany from 22 July 1976 through 3 May 1977.  

3.  He accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for the following:

* 9 January 1976 - stealing the property of another Soldier
* 25 March 1976 - willfully disobeying a lawful order from his superior noncommissioned officer
* 30 March 1976 - failing to go to his appointed place of duty
* 23 April 1976 - failing to go to his appointed place of duty
* 15 December 1976 - absenting himself from his appointed place of duty from 6 to 8 December 1976
* 11 April 1977 - absenting himself from his place of duty (guard duty) from 3 to 4 April 1977

4.  On 21 April 1977, he was convicted by a general court-martial of stealing the property of the United States Government of a value of $400.00 on 30 December 1976.  His sentence included discharge from the Army with a BCD.

5.  On 20 September 1977, Headquarters, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, KS, orders remitted the unexecuted portion of the sentence to forfeiture of all pay and allowances and restored the applicant to duty pending completion of appellate review.

6.  On 13 December 1977, he again accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ, for absenting himself from his unit from 11 to 15 November 1977 and from 28 November to 1 December 1977.

7.  On 17 March 1978, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review approved the findings of guilty and affirmed the sentence.

8.  On 8 June 1978, the U.S. Court of Military Appeals denied his request for a review of his case.

9.  On 26 June 1978, after completion of all required post-trial and appellate reviews, the convening authority ordered the BCD executed.

10.  Accordingly, on 9 July 1978 he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), chapter 11, as a result of court-martial in pay grade E-1.  He was credited with completing 2 years, 5 months, and 27 days of total active service with 160 days of time lost.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11 of that regulation provided that an enlisted person would be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial.  The appellate review had to be completed and the sentence affirmed before it could be duly executed.

12.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, states an honorable discharge was a separation with honor.  The honorable characterization was appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally had met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or was otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be inappropriate.

13.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge was a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  

14.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to change a court-martial conviction, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant accepted NJP on seven occasions for misconduct including being absent without leave.  He was convicted by a general court-martial of stealing government property and sentenced to a BCD.  Upon completion of appellate review he was discharged pursuant to the sentence and he was issued a BCD.

2.  His contention that his youth and immaturity made him do the wrong thing is without merit.  He was 18 years and 8 months of age when he enlisted in the RA. He was 19 years of age when he was first punished under Article 15.  There is no evidence he was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same or of a younger age who served successfully and completed their term of service.  
3.  He has provided no evidence to show that his discharge was unjust at the time of his misconduct.  There is no error or injustice in his record.  He has provided no evidence or argument to show his discharge should be upgraded to a general or fully honorable discharge.  He was properly discharged in accordance with pertinent regulations, with due process.  His misconduct during this period of enlistment, when weighed with his overall disciplinary history, warranted his BCD.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his requested relief.

4.  Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.  Given his undistinguished record of service and absent any mitigating factors, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate.  As a result, clemency is not warranted in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x ____  ____x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005599





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005599



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014263

    Original file (20090014263.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 6 April 1979, the applicant was discharged accordingly. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008639

    Original file (20110008639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 22 November 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110008639 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 13 April 1977, the applicant was discharged accordingly. Chapter 11 of this regulation, in effect at the time, provided that an enlisted person will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial, after completion of appellate review and after such affirmed sentence has been ordered duly executed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009253

    Original file (20130009253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Special court-martial (SPCM) Order Number 67, dated 1 August 1978, shows that on 25 May 1978 Charge I was dismissed; however, he was found guilty of Charge II (stealing about $1000 worth of property belonging to another Soldier) and Charge III (unlawfully striking Sergeant WGM on the neck and facial area with his fists). There is no documentation showing he petitioned the Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009903

    Original file (20100009903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100009903 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the applicant's discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021833

    Original file (20100021833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Accordingly, he was discharged in pay grade E-1 on 9 February 1977 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 11-2, as a result of a court-martial and issued a BCD. When...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018675

    Original file (20090018675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 20 October 1978, Headquarters, U.S. Army Element, I Corps (ROK [Republic of Korea]/US) Group, Special Court-Martial Order Number 23, approved the sentence and ordered it duly executed, but the execution of that portion adjudging confinement at hard labor in excess of 60 days was suspended until 16 April 1979. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071194C070402

    Original file (2002071194C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Order Number 127 ordered applicant’s discharge, effective the following day, citing the authority of GCM Order Number 68, which was the 11 November 1974 order issued by Fort Campbell, Kentucky promulgating the results of applicant’s general court-martial. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002144

    Original file (20130002144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following: * an upgrade of his 1992 bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general discharge based on his 10 years of service * correction to Item 12 (Date Entered AD (active duty) This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from AD), ending on 10 March 1992, to show 8 August 1976 2. Effective 1 October 1979, Army Regulation 635-5 was changed to reflect that the DD Form 214 would not be prepared for enlisted members discharged for immediate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010290

    Original file (20130010290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, KS, Special Court-Martial Order Number 109, dated 14 March 1977, shows that after completion of all required post-trial and appellate reviews the convening authority ordered the applicant's bad conduct discharge executed. There is no indication he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a review of his case within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021583

    Original file (20110021583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 January 1982, the applicant was discharged in absentia under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, as a result of court-martial. During his period of service, he was AWOL on 12 June 1977 for a period of 1 day; in military confinement from 21 April to 19 August 1980 for a period of 3 months and 29 days; and again AWOL from 3 December 1980 to his date of discharge on 18 January 1982 for a period of 1 year, 1 month, and 15...