Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004853
Original file (20120004853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  23 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004853 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states the AGCM was omitted from his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  On 15 January 1951, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years.  He completed his initial training and was assigned for duty in military occupational specialty (MOS) 4405 (Clerk Typist).  He was subsequently awarded MOS 1014 (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic) and 1816 (Personnel Administration Specialist).

3.  On or about 4 September 1951, the applicant was assigned for duty at Fort Davis, Canal Zone.

4.  On 23 April 1953, the applicant was temporarily promoted to sergeant, pay grade E-5.

5.  On 18 October 1953, the applicant departed the Canal Zone.

6.  On or about 19 October 1953, the applicant was assigned for duty at Fort Lewis, Washington.

7.  On 14 January 1954, the applicant was discharged.  His characterization of service was honorable.  He had completed 3 years of active duty service and served 1 year, 11 months, and 25 days of overseas service.

8.  His DA Form 20 (Qualification Record - Enlisted Personnel) shows in Item 46 (Record of Current Service) the applicant's principal duties, MOSs, and organizations.  However, the space intended for noting his ratings was not completed.

9.  The applicant's DA Form 24A (Service Record) shows no record of trials by court-martial, no lost time, and no negative endorsements from his commanders. In 1951 and 1953, his commanders gave him a favorable consideration for award of the AGCM.

10.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows his only award as the National Defense Service Medal.

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the AGCM.

2.  The applicant’s records clearly show that he distinguished himself in the performance of his military service as evidenced by his attaining the rank of sergeant and serving his complete term of enlistment, approximately two-thirds of which was served overseas.  His commanders noted their favorable consideration for award of the AGCM.  Therefore, it is presumed the applicant's failure to be awarded the AGCM for his service was an oversight.  Accordingly, he should be awarded 	this medal.

BOARD VOTE:

__x_____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 15 January 1951 to 
14 January 1954; and

	b.  adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).



      ____________x_____________
             CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004853





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004853



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017848

    Original file (20110017848.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 27 of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded: * United Nations Service Medal * Army of Occupation Medal with Japan clasp * Combat Infantryman Badge * Korean Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars 6. Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated that the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020865

    Original file (20110020865.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to add the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge, Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and United Nations Service Medal (UNSM). Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007089

    Original file (20100007089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 27 (Decorations, Awards, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he earned the Korean Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars during his active duty tenure: Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces) contains an entry indicating he received a shell fragment wound to his right hand on 23 March 1951 in Korea. Therefore absent derogatory information in the available record or an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010024

    Original file (20120010024.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), an unspecified sharpshooter marksmanship qualification badge, "Overseas Occupation Medal" (presumably he means the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp for the Army of Occupation of Italy) and "Colonel's Orderly Medal." Since Army Regulation 600-8-22 does not show the "Colonel's Orderly Medal" as an authorized award, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023886

    Original file (20110023886.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no record of time lost during his last enlistment indicated on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined. As a result, given the absence of derogatory information in the available NPRC file or on the DD Form 214 and given...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010927

    Original file (20070010927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 January 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070010927 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM) is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who served in Korea and adjacent waters between 25 June 1950...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015444

    Original file (20080015444.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record and separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and other earned awards not included in Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214. This source confirms that during his tenure of assignment, the applicant’s unit (Medical Company, 7th Infantry Regiment) received the following...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009912

    Original file (20100009912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM). Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board determined that the applicant also met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award). Although his records were apparently destroyed in the 1973 National Personnel Record Center fire, the available records show he was promoted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020416

    Original file (20090020416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a. reconsideration of his previous application for correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and b. correction of his record to show award of the Distinguished Unit Citation [now known as the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC)]. In the absence of evidence showing he was assigned to HHB, 2d Infantry Division Artillery during the period for which the unit was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025175

    Original file (20110025175.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded in combat during the Korean War. The applicant's DD Form 230 (Service Record) shows the following: * Section 4 (Service Outside Continental United States) shows he served in the Republic of Korea (ROK), during the period 13 January 1952 through 22 October 1952 * Section 8 (Wounds Received Through Enemy Action) is blank * Section 17 (Indorsements) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service, with the...