Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004780
Original file (20120004780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004780 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

2.  The applicant states after reaching 20 years in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG), he requested transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to accept a promotion to major (MAJ).  The applicant continues that he remained in the USAR Control Group until he was discharged for being a two-time non-select for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC).

3.  The applicant states he expected to receive a packet in the mail for him to make an election to be placed in the Retired Reserve.  He had sufficient time in the ALARNG to be placed in the Retired Reserve and he would have elected to transfer to the Retired Reserve if he had received notification.  By not being placed in the Retired Reserve, he will not be able to draw his retirement in the amount that he should when he turns 60 years of age.  It will be based on the amount when he was discharged from the USAR Control Group.  The applicant concludes his every intention was to be placed in the Retired Reserve, but he did not receive a packet or notification.

4.  The applicant provides:

* ALARNG memorandum, dated 15 July 1992
* ALARNG Orders 089-190, dated 30 March 1993
* U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) (now known as U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)) memorandum, dated 10 April 2000
* two PERSCOM memoranda, dated 28 February 2002 and 4 February 2003
* U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) (now also known as HRC) Orders D-02-306148, dated 12 February 2003
* National Guard Bureau Form 23B (ARNG Retirement Points History Statement) prepared on 16 November 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant in the ALARNG on 26 June 1976.

3.  A memorandum from the ALARNG, dated 15 July 1992, shows the applicant received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60.

4.  Orders 089-190 issued by the ALARNG, dated 30 March 1993, show the applicant was honorably separated from the ARNG effective 21 March 1993 and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

5.  A memorandum from PERSCOM, dated 10 April 2000, shows the applicant was promoted to the rank of MAJ effective 13 September 1998.
 
6.  A memorandum from PERSCOM, dated 28 February 2002, shows the applicant was notified that he was not selected for promotion to LTC.

7.  A memorandum from PERSCOM, dated 4 February 2003, shows the applicant was notified that he was not selected a second time for promotion to LTC.

8.  Orders D-02-306148 issued by ARPERSCOM, dated 12 February 2003, show the applicant was discharged from the USAR effective 1 August 2003.

9.  There is no evidence in the applicant's military service records that show he notified to make an elect to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

10.  On 30 April 2012 during the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Leader Development Division, HRC.  The official recommended denial and stated a review of the applicant's records revealed that the applicant was considered, but non-selected by the 2002 and 2003 LTC promotion boards.  There were no transactions in HRC's Soldier Management System (SMS), which show he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve after his second non-select for promotion to LTC.  The official further stated there was no comment in the SMS showing he was sent any correspondence from HRC explaining he had to make an election to transfer to the Retired Reserve.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14505, states that an Army MAJ who has failed of selection for promotion to the next higher grade for the second time shall be separated in accordance with section 14513 of this title not later than the first day of the seventh month after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time.

12.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) states, in pertinent part, MAJs who have failed selection for promotion to LTC for the second time and whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to LTC, will be separated.

13.  Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) states officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or MAJ, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board.

14.  Army Regulation 135-175 further states an officer with 20 years of qualifying Federal service for retire pay who is being considered for involuntary separation will be given an opportunity to elect transfer to the Retired Service in lieu of involuntary separation.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to correct his discharge orders to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve was carefully considered and it was determined there is sufficient evidence to support his request.
2.  Notwithstanding the advisory opinion's recommendation, in view of the fact that the applicant was not notified to be given the opportunity to elect to be transferred to the Retired Reserve the requested relief should be granted.  

3.  Therefore, it would serve the interest of equity and fairness to correct his records to reflect he elected to be transferred to the Retire Reserve.  Orders     D-02-306148 issued by ARPERSCOM, dated 12 February 2003, should be amended to show the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 August 2003.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders D-02-306148 issued by ARPERSCOM, dated 12 February 2003, to show the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 August 2003.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004780



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004780



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008772

    Original file (20080008772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-155 also states, in pertinent part, that an active duty officer, who is selected for promotion but removed from the ADL and placed in an active Reserve status prior to promotion, is not eligible for that promotion and that officer will be placed on the RASL and considered for promotion by a Reserve promotion board. With respect to the applicant's consideration for promotion to LTC by a Special Selection Board, there is no evidence in the applicant’s records and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008761

    Original file (20100008761 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Not all of his retirement years during this period were qualifying years of service. Paragraph 7-4b states that an officer who twice fails selection for promotion to MAJ will be discharged unless eligible for and requests transfer to the Retired Reserve. The evidence of record shows he was promoted to MAJ on 28 February 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009690

    Original file (20090009690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The memorandum alerted the applicant of the mandatory education requirements for promotion as specified in Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotions of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers). On 6 April 2004, by letter, the applicant was notified that HRC-St. Louis, MO reviewed the Report of Board Proceedings and approved the findings and recommendations of the board. With respect to the applicant’s discharge, the evidence of record shows that he was not selected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008198

    Original file (20130008198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was released from service in 1991 and early retirement was not offered; he was ultimately discharged in 2005 but he was not aware of the 15-year letter * he did not request to be removed from the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) and he has several letters from commanding officers not to remove him from the AGR * he was released from active duty in 1993 due to downsizing and he was placed in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) with 18 years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084855C070212

    Original file (2003084855C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his major (MAJ) date of rank (DOR) be adjusted to 30 June 1994 based on the constructive credit he received upon his appointment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). The record also confirms that based on the applicant’s constructive service credit his PED to MAJ would have been established as 30 June 1994; however, he remained in training in the STRAP through 30 June 1996, and at the applicant’s request in an application to this Board, action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011719

    Original file (20110011719.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    To that end, he has not provided a copy of the letter or any documentation requesting transfer to the IRR at the time of his retirement. d. Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), paragraph 7-3.1(b) states "an officer (other than a commissioned warrant officer) or enlisted Soldier who has accrued 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay is required to attain 50 points annually to be retained in an active status in the Selected Reserve, IRR, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070712C070402

    Original file (2002070712C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents: Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM), St. Louis, Missouri, letter Subject: Submission of Voluntary Retirement, dated 1 March 2000; retirement orders, dated 28 August 2000; request to rescind retirement actions and for extension on AFS with chain of command endorsements, dated 6 September 2000; separation document (DD Form 214), dated 31 January 2001; Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), St. Louis, letter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013134

    Original file (20120013134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He is a Special Agent/GS-14 (now Senior Executive Service) with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and has been designated a Key Federal Employee since May 2010 * Despite being twice not selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC), he was provided positive written notifications, on two occasions, that he was SELCON (continued service on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) in March 2011, approved by the Secretary of the Army (SA) * Regardless whether a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020952

    Original file (20120020952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was placed in the Retired Reserve after being twice non-selected for promotion to LTC only 4 years after being promoted to MAJ. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other Than General Officers) specifies that MAJ to LTC mandatory boards occur when an officer reaches 7 years TIG. d. ABCMR Docket Number AR20060014854, dated 17 January 2007, pertaining to his selection to MAJ by the SSB 2005SS12R7 adjourning on 4 November 2005 indicates the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022351

    Original file (20120022351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was selected for promotion to LTC in June 2012 and he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 1 August 2012. Although the applicant was selected for promotion prior to his REFRAD from the AGR Program, the board was not approved until after his REFRAD, resulting in the applicant being a promotable LTC on the RASL. Evidence of record shows that on 30 January 2012 the applicant was notified by memorandum that the Secretary of the Army approved the SELCON Board recommendation...