Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004720
Original file (20120004720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004720 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he entered active duty on 4 April 1986 and was discharged on 21 November 1991 due to asthma.

2.  The applicant states he attempted to have his DD Form 214 corrected for the first 7 years after his discharge and gave up out of frustration.  However, he has now become a Department of Defense civil servant and found out how to accomplish it.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, discharge orders, driver's license, and passport.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Phoenix, Arizona, in pay grade E-2 on 4 April 1989 for a period of 4 years and 14 weeks, training as an infantryman, and a cash enlistment bonus.  He completed one-station unit training at Fort Benning, Georgia, and was transferred to Fort Drum, New York, on 26 July 1989.

3.  On 12 October 1989, an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) determined the applicant had asthma that was not well controlled by medication and that his condition existed prior to service (EPTS).  The EPSB indicated that the applicant experienced marked difficulty on or about 10 June 1989 at Fort Benning and related a history of childhood asthma up to age 12 (which he denied on his entrance exam).  The EPSB recommended his discharge as he did not meet enlistment standards.  The findings were approved on 30 October 1989 and the applicant concurred with the findings and requested to be discharged without delay.

4.  On 21 November 1989, he was honorably discharged in pay grade E-2 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-11, due to not meeting medical procurement standards.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will reflect information contained in official records at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's administrative discharge was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no procedural violations of any of the applicant's rights.  Accordingly, the reason for his discharge was correct and in compliance with regulations in effect at the time and he failed to show otherwise.

2.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he entered active duty on 4 April 1986 and served until he was discharged on 21 November 1991 has been noted and found to lack merit.

3.  The applicant failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he served on active duty for any period other than that which is reflected on his DD Form 214.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence there appears to be no basis to grant his request.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004720



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004720



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009493

    Original file (20060009493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did not get out for medical reasons, it was for physical training failure. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-2, on 19 June 1995, for 4 years, with a medical waiver. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007950

    Original file (AR20100007950.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2009, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015120

    Original file (20080015120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was ordered to report for 17 weeks of initial active duty for training (IADT) on 8 July 1998. The EPSBD further found the applicant did meet retention standards under the provisions of Chapter 3 of Army Regulation 40-501 and recommended that he be separated from the military service under paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010915

    Original file (20120010915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It does contain memoranda from the applicant’s battalion commander and the separation authority, the brigade commander, Subject: Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) Proceedings, and shows after reviewing the EPSBD proceedings the battalion commander recommended the applicant’s separation and the separation authority approved his separation action under the provisions of paragraph 5-11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). The applicant's record also contains a DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008781

    Original file (20140008781.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 4707 also showed his last name and social security number (SSN) incorrectly: * the form showed "PxxxTxx" and the spelling should be "PxxxLxx" * the form showed his SSN as "xxx-xx-9197" and the correct SSN is "xxx-xx-9172" c. He received a letter from the Army, dated 25 March 1986, wherein he was asked to sign and return the previously sent DA Form 4707. On 30 January 1986, during his 10th week of OSUT, he received medical treatment for left knee pain. On 12 February 1986, a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000978

    Original file (AR20130000978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130000978 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The characterization of service for Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004537

    Original file (20090004537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 April 1998, the medical approving authority approved the findings of the EPSBD and recommended that the applicant be separated from the service under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel). A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014244

    Original file (20120014244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 7a (Place of Entry into Active Duty) of his 31 March 1991 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he entered active duty at Grissom Air Force Base (AFB), IN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his 1991 DD Form 214 accordingly.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007889

    Original file (AR20130007889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 March 2004, for a period of 4 years. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a copy of his basic training and medical records, including the front page of DA Form 4707, dated 26 August 2004; DD Form 214 for service under current review; and his discharge orders. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007830

    Original file (AR20130007830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to honorable and the narrative reason changed. On 17 December 2012, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with service uncharacterized. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.