Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004662
Original file (20120004662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004662 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 11d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the month he was released from active duty as August vice April.

2.  The applicant states the discharge date on his DD Form 214 is incorrect.  It should be August 1966, but he does not remember the exact day.  He was in the Army for 25 months, 13 of those months were spent in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 July 1964 and he held military occupational specialty 95B (Military Policeman (MP)).

3.  He served in Vietnam from 2 April 1965 to 25 April 1966 while assigned to the 506th MP Company.

4.  U.S. Army Personnel Center, Oakland, CA, Special Orders Number 119, dated 29 April 1966, released him from active duty effective 29 April 1966 and reassigned him to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to complete his Reserve obligation.

5.  In conjunction with his release from active duty, the applicant underwent a medical examination at Oakland Army Base, CA, on 29 April 1966.  His records contain a Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History) wherein he annotated he was in excellent health.  He authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate block on 29 April 1966.

6.  He was honorably released from active duty on 29 April 1966 and transferred to the USAR.  He completed 1 year, 9 months, and 6 days of creditable active service.

7.  Item 11b (Station or Installation at Which Effected) of his DD Form 214 contains the entry "U.S. ARMY PERSONNEL CENTER, OAKLAND, CA."  Item 11d contains the entry "29 APR 66."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record confirms the applicant was released from active duty on 29 April 1966 which is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.  There is no evidence in his record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he served on active duty through August 1966.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004662



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004662



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019613

    Original file (20110019613.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: * His DOR is 9 September 1966, not 9 September 1967 * He was inducted on 25 or 26 May 1965, not 27 May 1966 * He was separated on 29 April 1969, not 6 April 1968 * Item 25 of his DD Form 214 should show he completed basic combat training (BCT) and advanced individual training (AIT) * He completed the 8-week Wireman course in 1965, not 1966 * Item 25 of his DD Form 214 should show he completed the 8-week Switchboard Course, 2-week Film Projection School, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009224

    Original file (20130009224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 January 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130009224 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of the discharge date shown in item 11d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer of Discharge) to show 18 September 1971. His records contain Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, SO Number 261, dated 18 September 1971, releasing him from active duty on 18 September 1971 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015334

    Original file (20140015334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty this period on 13 May 1968, was honorably released from active duty on "28 August 1968" [sic], and transferred to the SDARNG. The evidence of record shows the applicant's correct SSN was entered in his military records during the period of his active duty. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show both his correct SSN and effective date of release from active duty (i.e., 28 August 1969), as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008169

    Original file (20130008169.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 January 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130008169 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002851

    Original file (20090002851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the applicant's active duty service in the defense of the Republic of Korea for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, he is eligible for award of the KDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant's DD Form 214 with a separation date of 29 June 1987 to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012889

    Original file (20140012889.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in his records and he provides none to show he was awarded 15 awards of the Air Medal. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 14 April 1965 to 28 February 1967 * deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal, one overseas service bar, and the Air Medal * adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023243

    Original file (20110023243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 29 August 1968 through 13 August 1970 and held the rank of 1LT at the time of his release from active duty. The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002005

    Original file (20150002005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her home of record (HOR) as Houston, TX instead of Sacramento, CA. By law and regulation, the HOR is the place recorded as the home of the individual at the time of their enlistment or induction, and there is no authority to change the HOR officially recorded at the time of entry into military service. In this case, the evidence of record shows her HOR at the time of her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009945

    Original file (20140009945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 24 (Service Record) which was created upon his entry on active duty also listed his Service Number as "RA-17-497-XXX." His DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years of active service. The date of separation listed on his DD Form 214 is correct and there is no reason to change it.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013901

    Original file (20100013901.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 5 (HOR) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document) shows his HOR as "Fairfield, CA 94533" and item 6 (Place of Enlistment/Reenlistment) shows the entry "Oakland, CA." The DD Form 214 is prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. Oakland, CA, was correctly established as the place of entry on active duty and Fairfield, CA, as his HOR.