IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 September 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120004582
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he was wounded by shrapnel in Vietnam on 3 June 1969 while serving with the 1st Battalion, 82nd Artillery. He was treated at the battalion aid station for a chest wound from grenade fragments.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 September 1967. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 13A (Field Artillery Basic).
3. He served in Vietnam with the 1st Battalion, 82nd Artillery, from on or about 23 July 1968 to on or about 19 July 1969.
4. He was honorably released from active duty in the rank/pay grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 on 23 July 1969. He completed 1 year, 10 months, and 8 days of creditable active service with no lost time. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the following:
* National Defense Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Vietnam Service Medal
* two overseas service bars
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
5. Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the entry "Foreign article in [left] Chest," dated 4 June 1969.
6. He provides a Standard Form 600 that shows he sustained a small superficial wound to his left anterior hemisphere thorax due to grenade fragments on 3 June 1969. No piece of grenade was found.
7. His records do not contain orders awarding him the Purple Heart and his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster.
8. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), chapter 9 of the version in effect at the time, stated that a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment that were received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization, would be entered in item 40 of the DA Form 20. This regulation further stated the date the wound or injury occurred would also be entered in item 40.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22, paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal. It states a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in. Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, participation credit was awarded for the following four campaigns:
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V 1 July-1 November 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI 2 November 1968-22 February 1969
* Tet 69 Counteroffensive 1969 23 February-8 June 1969
* Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 9 June-31 October 1969
11. Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to:
* Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command, and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973
* Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973
12. A review of the applicant's service record shows no derogatory information that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Furthermore, item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his military service.
13. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's DA Form 20 lists an injury he sustained in combat on 3 June 1969. The DA Form 20 is a record of the applicant's history in the Army and an entry for wounds received would not be made on this document without orders or a casualty report. The DA Form 20 is a source document for completion of the DD Form 214. This injury is further confirmed with the medical document he provides that shows he was treated for the injury. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show it.
2. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, he participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these bronze service stars.
3. General orders awarded his unit in Vietnam the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of service in Vietnam. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award.
4. He served honorably during the period 15 September 1967 through 22 July 1969. He attained the rank of PFC/E-3, served in Vietnam, and received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Absent any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. His DD Form 214 should also be corrected to show this award.
BOARD VOTE:
____x___ ____x___ ____x___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
* awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 3 June 1969 in Vietnam
* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 15 September 1967 through 22 July 1969
* adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 the
* Purple Heart
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
*
Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* four bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal
_____________x____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120004582
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120004582
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017301
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. His record shows he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal after his DD Form 214 released him from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018143
Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Purple Heart and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action on 3 January 1970; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010961
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Lacking any other derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and correct his records to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023442
There is no evidence in his records and he provides none to show he was awarded a second award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 9 April 1968 through 8 April 1970; and b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017314
Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the Purple Heart was awarded for an injury or wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The evidence of record also shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his service in the Army, he attained the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5, served in Vietnam, and was wounded in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021050
Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart (1st Award) for wounds sustained during hostile action and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006806
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. The evidence of records shows the applicant was wounded in action on 3 May 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 3 May 1970; * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022086
The applicant qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and he served in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. d. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal and correct his DD Form 214 to show the award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007216
Furthermore, item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Lacking any other derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and correct his records to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001664
There are no orders in his military personnel record awarding him a third Purple Heart. The applicant states he did not receive orders for his second Purple Heart for being wounded on 11 February 1969; therefore, a copy of the respective orders will be provided with these Proceedings. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Purple Heart and the Vietnam Service...