Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004580
Original file (20120004580.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  2 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004580 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that she receive a refund for all SBP premiums taken from her retired pay.

2.  She states she elected not to participate in the SBP, but her Retiree Account Statement shows she was enrolled in the SBP.

3.  She provides her DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) and Retiree Account Statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After having had prior service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on    9 March 1993.  She continued to serve on active duty through a series of reenlistments.

2.  She completed a DD Form 2656 and signed this form on 15 September 2011.  She placed an "X" in the first block of item 26g indicating she did not elect to participate in the SBP.  She also placed an "X" in the first block of item 26g indicating she had eligible dependents under the plan.  This form indicates her spouse and two dependent children were residing in Aliceville, AL at that time.  

3.  Her spouse did not sign the DD Form 2656 under Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) to indicate he concurred with the SBP decision made by the applicant.  

4.  She retired on 1 February 2012.  Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) indicates she was assigned to Fort Carson, CO at the time of retirement.  

5.  Her Retiree Account Statement with an effective date of 13 February 2012 shows SBP spouse only costs had been deducted from her retired pay in the amount of $112.71.  

6.  In an email, dated 13 March 2012, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service informed a staff member that their office had no record of any withdrawal request from the applicant and would need an administrative correction from the Army to change the SBP now.

7.  In a notarized statement, dated 16 March 2012, the applicant's spouse concurred with her decision to decline the SBP.

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted on 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.  An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse (or child only, if applicable) coverage. 

9.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant retired on 1 February 2012.  

2.  On 15 September 2011, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 and elected not to participate in the SBP.  Her spouse did not sign the DD Form 2656 indicating he concurred with her decision to decline participation in SBP.  As a result, she was automatically enrolled in SBP.  

3.  Given her near immediate application to the board, it appears it was always the applicant's and her spouse’s intent to decline participation in SBP, but they simply misunderstood the concurrence requirement.  Therefore, as a matter of equity and in light of her spouse's verification of his concurrence, it would be appropriate to amend the applicant’s DD Form 2656 to show she declined to participate in the SBP in a timely manner and to refund her any paid premiums.

BOARD VOTE:

____x__  ____x____  __x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending her DD Form 2656 to show she and her spouse signed the form declining to participate in the SBP and the form was properly notarized;

	b.  showing DFAS timely received and processed the DD Form 2656 confirming declination of SBP; and

	c.  refunding her all SBP premiums paid as a result of this correction.



      __________x_______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004580



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004580



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001471

    Original file (20140001471.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides a Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement. After he retired, on 30 August 2013, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 and elected not to participate in the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his DD Form 2656 to show he and his spouse timely signed the form declining to participate in the SBP and the form was properly notarized; b. showing DFAS timely received and processed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001114

    Original file (20090001114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show that she declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that she receive a refund for all SBP premiums taken from her retired pay. The applicant states that she did not request the SBP deduction and her spouse signed her application for retirement indicating he knew he would not receive SBP benefits. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s 20-year letter was dated 5 May 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017092

    Original file (20110017092.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that she receive a refund for all SBP premiums taken from her retired pay. She provides: * Certified mail receipt * Letter addressed to DFAS * Standard Form 1199A (Direct Deposit) * DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits) * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * Retiree Account Statement * Letter from DFAS, Retired and Annuity Pay * ARPC Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022350

    Original file (20120022350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the date she signed was after the date of her spouse's signature on the Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement. By law, her spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date she made this election but prior to the date of her retirement. Therefore, in the interest of equity, the applicant's records should be corrected to show she elected not to participate in the SBP with her spouse's concurrence and reimbursing her for any excess SBP premiums paid.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009786

    Original file (20120009786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a statement from his spouse. In item 32 (Member), the statement reads "Also I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. c. In Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) (Required when member is married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage; the date of the spouse's signature in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020073

    Original file (20080020073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His spouse provided a notarized statement, dated 13 May 2009, indicating she concurred with the applicant's election not to participate in the SBP. However, even though his spouse signed the DD Form 2656 indicating she concurred with his decision to decline participation in the SBP, the form was not notarized as required. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 2656 of the individual concerned be amended to show he and his spouse signed the form in a timely manner declining to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017056

    Original file (20110017056.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110017056 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of the record to show election of no Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for her spouse prior to her retirement and reimbursement of premiums already collected. On 21 February 2012, the applicant and her spouse provided a notarized letter to the Board further asserting their claim that they did not request to participate in the SBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021185

    Original file (20110021185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 2 March 2011 * SBP Spouse Election Concurrence Statement, dated 8 March 2011 * Retiree Account Statement, dated 29 September 2011 * letter of explanation/correction request, dated 14 October 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. By law, his spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date he made this election but prior to the date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006674

    Original file (20120006674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her retiree account statement is not available for review; however, without her spouse's signature in item 32a of her DD Form 2656, indicating his concurrence with her decision to decline participation in the SBP, her SBP election would automatically default to spouse-only coverage by law. By law, since her spouse did not acknowledge his concurrence of her election not to participate in the SBP prior to her effective date of retirement, it is proper that her SBP election defaulted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011716

    Original file (20080011716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with his spouse's concurrence. By doing so, he also acknowledged he had been counseled that he can terminate SBP participation, with his spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. Completion of Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of DD Form 2656 is required when a service member is married and...