Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004466
Original file (20120004466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE: 23 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004466


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he was in combat and requests the CIB.  He also requests "proof of service."

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 August 1969.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63C (Track Vehicle Mechanic).


3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 38 (Record of Assignment) that he was assigned as a wheeled vehicle mechanic in MOS 63A and track vehicle mechanic in MOS 63C to Service Battery, 1st Battalion, 83d Field Artillery, Vietnam, from 28 May 1970 through 12 April 1971 and

	b.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and Vietnam Service Medal.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was honorably released from active duty on 17 April 1971 as a specialist four/E-4.

	a.  Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) shows he is credited with 11 months and 3 days of foreign service in the U.S. Army Pacific (Vietnam).

	b.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bars (M-14 and M-16).

	c.  Item 30 (Remarks) shows his Vietnam service as 14 May 1970-16 April 1971.

5.  There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's records that shows he was awarded the CIB.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence clearly shows the applicant served in Vietnam; however, there is no available evidence showing he held an eligible MOS for the CIB.  Therefore, his request should be denied.

2.  A copy of his DD Form 214 will be provided to him.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x___________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000695



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004466



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021445

    Original file (20100021445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available record and he has not provided any to show he held an infantry MOS at any time during his military career. Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021594

    Original file (20090021594.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 October 1971 to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and campaign participation credit for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from May to December 1970. Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns while serving in the RVN. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000027

    Original file (20110000027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His primary MOS was 63C (Track Vehicle Mechanic) and because he qualified as an expert with his M-16 Rifle, he was assigned duties as an M-60 Machinegun gunner on an M113 (Armored Personnel Carrier); however, he was never awarded MOS 11B and his records should show this MOS. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry and warrant officers and enlisted personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013249

    Original file (20130013249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. There are no orders in the applicant's record that show he was awarded an infantry MOS. However, his service record does not contain evidence that shows he met all the requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007265

    Original file (20080007265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 2 September 1967 to 17 July 1968 and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size (Company C, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry); however, he held a vehicle mechanic MOS. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant completed another period of service in the Republic of Vietnam as an infantryman from 4 June 1970 to 18 September 1970 (when he departed on leave), and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007404C070206

    Original file (20050007404C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Richard G. Sayre | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). However, as confirmed by the HRC Awards Branch, during the Vietnam era, award of the CIB was only authorized for enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018919

    Original file (20090018919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record does not show he was ever awarded an infantry MOS. Therefore, he has not met the requirements for award of the CIB or correction of his records to show an infantry MOS. In the absence of any corroborating evidence which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the PH in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019944

    Original file (20120019944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows he performed the duties of a vehicle mechanic while assigned to an infantry unit during his tour of duty in Vietnam; however, by regulation, in order to support award of the Combat Infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058833C070421

    Original file (2001058833C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Purple Heart (PH), the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) as authorized awards. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) lists the BSM with "V" Device, the PH, and the ARCOM. General Order Number 896 awarded the applicant the BSM for meritorious service; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028174

    Original file (20100028174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 December 1968. There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant should be awarded the CIB. In the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case.