Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004288
Original file (20120004288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004288 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests:

* reconsideration of his previously denied request for payment of a $20,000.00 Critical Skill Retention Bonus-Army Reserve (CSRB-AR) to be backdated to December 2008
* a formal hearing

2.  The applicant states:

* it is not his duty to change his own area of concentration (AOC) from 15A (General Aviation) to 15B (Combined Arms Operations Aviator) as a Reservist
* he exhausted his chain of command to complete this action and they concluded that the duty to change the AOC was the responsibility of the U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC)
* the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) did not look into the system of record (the interactive Personnel Records Management System (iPERMS)), as his duty was already changed from 15A to 15B
* the ABCMR should note that a previous OER is not the formal system of record
* he performed every possible action required to receive the bonus
* the bonus would have been awarded if he had not been deployed in 2008, as he would have completed the training as scheduled


3.  The applicant provides:

* a memorandum from the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Headquarters,
11th Aviation Command, Fort Knox, KY, dated 5 January 2012
* ABCMR Record of Proceedings in Docket Number AR20110000854, dated 21 July 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20110000854, on 21 July 2011.

2.  The applicant provides a memorandum from the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Headquarters, 11th Aviation Command, Fort Knox as new evidence that was not previously considered.  Therefore, the new evidence warrants consideration by the Board.

3.  The applicant is a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) aviation captain who was ordered to active duty on 12 December 2005 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF).

4.  An Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD) Memorandum, subject:  CSRB-AR, U.S. Army Reserve Captain CSRB-AR, dated 12 December 2007, announced approval of the Army's request to pay USAR captains who execute a written agreement to serve in an active status for not less than 3 years in certain AOCs up to $20,000.00.  The AOC 15B was listed as critical for CSRB-AR purposes.

5.  Records show the applicant served in Iraq from 11 January 2006 to 7 January 2007 and he continued on active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom from 1 March 2007 to 30 March 2008.  He was released from active duty on 
31 March 2008.

6.  On 16 June 2008, the applicant inquired about a waiver for the CSRB-AR for 15B aviators due to the fact he was being deployed and he wanted to know if those officers who were deployed would have the same opportunity to qualify for the CSRB as those who were not deployed.

7.  On 25 August 2008, the applicant's commander in Iraq submitted a request for exception to policy for the CSRB-AR in behalf of the applicant.  In his request, the commander noted the following:


* the applicant has been continuously deployed/mobilized since being ordered to active duty and he had not been afforded the opportunity to attend the required training
* the applicant held a 15B position at his Troop Program Unit (TPU) and he was acting in the capacity as a 15B Aviation Officer/Pilot
* the applicant would have completed all requirements for the CSRB-AR within his mobilization timeframe and he would have been eligible for the bonus had he not been deployed

8.  On 28 December 2008, the applicant was notified that the exception to policy request was returned without action because he still had time to complete the required training to qualify for the CSRB-AR.

9.  Headquarters, USARC, memorandum subject:  Suspension of CSRB-AR, dated 1 October 2009, announced that effective 20 September 2009, the
CSRB-AR was suspended until further notice (except for AOC 37A and 38A).  The memorandum further states that "requests for exception will be considered on a case-by-case basis."

10.   The applicant's DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) shows he completed the Aviation Captains Career Course (AV-CCC) on 19 December 2009.

11.  The applicant held the AOC 15A at the time the CSRB-AR was announced and at the time of its suspension.  

12.  A memorandum from the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Headquarters, USARC, subject:  Exception to Policy for [the applicant], dated 25 February 2010, states "[The applicant] is not qualified in an AOC authorized to receive the bonus.  The Army Reserve was not provided the authority to grant an exception to policy to provide the bonus for an AOC not on the authorized list."

13.  The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Headquarters, 11th Aviation Command, Fort Knox, provided a memorandum on behalf of the applicant.  He states:

* the applicant did not meet the requirements for the CSRB-AR because he was not qualified as a 15B aviation officer when the bonus was suspended on 20 September 2009
* he believes the Soldier should be given the bonus as an exception to policy because he was disadvantaged by an involuntary mobilization that prevented him from becoming AOC 15B qualified before the suspension date
* the circumstances show the applicant was extremely proactive in trying to meet the CSRB-AR requirements and become AOC 15B qualified before the suspension date of the bonus

*	the applicant was scheduled to attend the AV-CCC in December 2008 which would have qualified him for the CSRB-AR as an AOC 15B 
*	before he was able to attend the AV-CCC, he was involuntarily mobilized in support of OIF from May 2008 to February 2009
*	the applicant requested an exception to policy from USARC in December 2008 for the CSRB-AR because the involuntary deployment caused him to cancel the AV-CCC reservation
*	USARC denied his request because the USARC G-1 thought the applicant still had time to attend the AV-CCC when he returned from his deployment
*	the applicant returned from his deployment in February 2009 and he attempted to attend the AV-CCC in April 2009, but he was unable because the course was already filled
*	he was scheduled for the next AV-CCC in December 2009, but the CSRB-AR was suspended in September 2009, 3 months before he completed the course qualifying him in AOC 15B
*	the applicant requested a second exception to policy through USARC in November 2009, but it was denied because his AOC in the Total Army Personnel Database – Reserve (TAPDB-R) was still showing an AOC 15A instead of AOC 15B
*	the applicant, along with his unit, attempted multiple times to update his AOC in TAPDB-R to show his AOC 15B qualification
*	the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) was moving from St. Louis, MO to Fort Knox and this delayed updating the applicant's records until November 2010

* with regard to the ABCMR decision,

* the Soldier does not have the ability to update/change their AOC; the Soldier's career manager makes the necessary updates
* HRC's move from Missouri to Kentucky delayed the TAPDB-R update until November 2010, even though he was qualified as a 15B on 19 December 2009

* the issue is not whether he met the requirements for the CSRB-AR because he was not qualified as a 15B aviation officer, but rather he was 


disadvantaged by going on an involuntary deployment and had no opportunity to meet the requirements before the bonus was suspended
*	he did everything humanly possible to try and meet the requirements for the CSRB-AR bonus

14.  Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) states the ABCMR will decide cases on the evidence of record.  It is not an investigative body.  The ABCMR may, in its discretion, hold a hearing.  Applicants do not have a right to a hearing before the ABCMR.  The Director or the ABCMR may grant a formal hearing whenever justice requires. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention and the documentation he provided were carefully considered.

2.  Although the applicant has requested to personally appear before the Board, there is sufficient evidence available for a fair and impartial consideration of his case without such an appearance.

3.  There is no doubt the applicant was disadvantaged in attending the AV-CCC.  However, the applicant clearly was not AOC 15B qualified on either the announcement date or the suspension date of the CSRB-AR bonus.  Records show he completed the AV-CCC in December 2009.

4.  Although it is unfortunate the applicant was unable to attend the AV-CCC at an opportune time, the needs of the Army took precedence.  As a matter of equity, it would be unfair to other Soldiers similarly situated to grant such a request when the requirements were not met.

5.  Updating the applicant's 15B AOC qualification in the TAPDB-R had no affect on this eligibility for the CSRB-AR bonus since he completed the course after the suspension date.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.







BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110000854, dated 21 July 2011.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004288



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004288



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005726

    Original file (20120005726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her record contains a Written Agreement – OAB Addendum, dated 10 May 2008. She attested she signed the written agreement on 10 May 2008, she obtained a reservation for BOLC from the NGB, she was slotted to attend the course beginning July 2010, and she graduated on 8 September 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant signed a written agreement for a $10,000.00 OAB at the time of her commissioning/appointment in the ARNG on 10 May 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013345

    Original file (20130013345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After he received the first $10,000.00, he assumed all of the documentation for the CSRB anniversary payment was on file at both the unit and the State Incentive Office. The applicant signed a CSRB agreement with the UTARNG on 25 February 2008 in critical AOC 15B. Although an exception to policy was requested, the request for payment of the second installment of the CSRB in the amount of $10,000.00 was subsequently denied by NGB because the working copy of the CSRB agreement was filed in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011156

    Original file (20120011156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). At the time of his application to this Board he was still serving in the MDARNG. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was not qualified in specialty 15B at the time he entered into the CSRB written agreement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013381

    Original file (20130013381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a memorandum, dated 4 November 2011, from the Deputy Chief of Staff, SCARNG, to the NGB, wherein he requested the applicant be granted an ETP for [receipt of the second installment] of the CSRB and stated both AOCs were entered on line 11 (of the CSRB written agreement) and the applicant had satisfied all requirements outlined in the contract. Notwithstanding his contention or the orders issued by the SCARNG showing the reason for his transfer to the 159th AV REG in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023934

    Original file (20110023934.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a critical skills retention bonus (CSRB) as an aviator. On 11 February 2010, the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 (Personnel Officer), Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC), disapproved the applicant's request for an exception to policy for the CSRB. The opinion stated that the applicant: a. was qualified in specialty 15B and was eligible for the CSRB at the time of its offering and his signing of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004342

    Original file (20150004342.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In connection with this appointment, she signed a Written Agreement-OAB Addendum, wherein she indicated; * she agreed to serve in the Selected Reserve in AOC 15A which is a critical officer skill that is designated for bonus entitlement by the Secretary of Defense or his delegate * she agreed to accomplish the necessary training to achieve this designation within 36 months of appointment * she is being accessed into the NGB approved critical skill of 15A and shall receive $10,000 paid in two...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016796

    Original file (20100016796.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. Mr. RS responded on 12 June 2008 by telling the applicant it appeared that he was still eligible to receive the bonus and indicated that he needed to qualify in one of the two critical boxes. He sent a third message on 22 July 2009 indicating he denied the applicant’s request for the CSRB because he never submitted a properly-executed written agreement, even after two reminders. The evidence of record shows that the applicant resigned from his position as a UA in order to mobilize and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002515

    Original file (20120002515.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Memorandum for Record, subject: Exception to Policy - CSRB, dated 8 June 2011, with command endorsements, dated 16 June, 26 August, and 10 November 2011, that recommend approval of the applicant's request based on the ABCMR decision that corrected his records to show he was promoted to CPT on 9 July 2009. b. U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC), Fort Bragg, NC, memorandum, subject: Exception to Policy, dated 10 January 2012, that disapproved the applicant's request for CSRB based on the fact...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021496

    Original file (20140021496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) for payment of the remaining $10,000.00 of his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) and relief from recoupment of the portion already paid. The applicant states: * he was in an eligible position and eligible for the CSRB in 2008 and the necessary documents were sent to his headquarters and he was paid the first half of the bonus * he inquired about the unpaid portion of the bonus years later and he was informed that a records review was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015768

    Original file (20120015768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum states: * On 20 November 2008 the applicant qualified for the CSRB in the amount of $20,000.00 * He met the criteria for the CSRB and was issued a bonus control number * His unit contacted that office to inquire about his second half of the incentive * Unfortunately that office could not assist him with his payment due to the working copy of his CSRB being placed into his records rather than the signed documents * The unit has recognized this error and has taken the necessary...