Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004044
Original file (20120004044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:

	BOARD DATE:  6 September 2012

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004044 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an exception to policy for payment for 72.5 days of accrued leave.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he had 72.5 days of annual leave saved as a result of his mission in Southwest Asia where he served as the Aviation Project Officer and contracting officer's representative for an aviation contract valued at over $756 million and involving 1,200 personnel.  His section should have had 5 personnel but there were only 2.  His mandatory retirement age was 62 and he was told finance would pay him for the 72.5 days of leave based on an exception to policy.  He later was informed finance would not pay him for the leave.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* his retirement orders
* memorandum, subject:  Crossing Multiple Months Outside the Continental United States
* trip timeline
* his leave and earnings statements (LES) for 1-31 May 2011
* temporary duty (TDY) orders to proceed on 13 October 2010 for 30 days
* TDY orders to proceed on 7 January 2011 for 68 days
* letter of lateness concerning submission of his retirement request
* his 23 February 1989 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 
* his 31 May 2011 DD Form 214 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a retired Regular Army (RA) aviation maintenance chief warrant officer five (CW5). 

2.  The applicant provided orders showing he was:

     a.  TDY in October 2010 for 30 days to Camp Arifjan, Kuwait to conduct inspections on aircraft maintenance sites in Kuwait and Iraq and to train and integrate a government employee.

     b.  On a temporary change of station in support of Operation New Dawn Kuwait with a proceed date of 15 December 2010 for a period not to exceed 365 days.

     c.  TDY from 7 January to 15 March 2011 (68 days) to conduct contract site inspections and surveys in Kuwait, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

3.  His May 2011 LES shows he had previously been paid 60 days of annual leave.  He retired on 31 May 2011.

4.  In connection with the processing of this case, on 27 March 2012, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief of Compensation and Entitlements Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1, Pentagon, Washington, D.C.  The Chief recommended disapproval of the applicant's request and stated that:

     a.  The applicant's May 2011 LES shows he had (previously) cashed out the maximum number of annual leave days (60) upon retirement from the Regular Army on 31 May 2011.  

     b.  Title 37, U.S. Code (USC) section 501 (Payments for unused leave, paragraph (f) indicates that "the number of days upon which payment under subsection (b) or (g) is based may not exceed sixty, unless the number of days for which payment has been previously made under such subsections after February 9, 1976.  For the purposes of this subsection, the number of days upon which payment may be based shall be determined without regard to any break in service or change in status in the uniformed services."  However, the limitation in subsection (f) shall not apply with respect to leave accrued by:

     c.  A member of a Reserve component while serving on active duty in support of a contingency operation.

     d.  A member of the Armed Forces in the Retired Reserve while serving on active duty in support of a contingency operation.

     e.  A retired member of the RA, Regular Navy, Regular Air Force, or Regular Marine Corps or a member of the Fleet Reserve or Fleet Marine Corps Reserve while the member is serving on active duty in support of a contingency operations.

     f.  A member of a Reserve component while serving on active duty, 
full-time National Guard duty, or active duty for training for a period of more than 30 days but not in excess of 365 days.

     g.  The applicant does not meet any of the criteria in a, b, c, or d above for cashing out additional annual leave upon RA retirement, regardless of the circumstances.

5.  The applicant was furnished a copy of this advisory opinion on 2 March 2012. He did not concur and submitted a rebuttal statement on 5 April 2012.  He stated that:

     a.  He was on active duty in support of Operation New Dawn during the drawdown from Iraq and deployed to Afghanistan with the Contracting Field Team equipment and personnel.

     b.  His May 2011 LES does not indicate he cashed out the maximum number of days of leave upon retirement from the RA on 31 May 2011.  He only received $97.73 on the second LES, dated 31 May 2011.  He included copies of two LESs he received for May 2011 to show he did not get paid for the 72.5 days of leave, as an exception to policy.

     c.  As a Soldier he was trained to follow his last order.  He was asked to stay by his leaders and complete the mission, so he did just that.  The statement that finance would pay him for his 72.5 days of leave under an exception to policy came from a call his G1 in Kuwait made back the States.  He did not receive the payment when he retired at Fort Bragg, NC.  Mr. H____ informed him that finance was not going to pay him for the leave.  He included copies of his January through June 2011 LES.  He is only asking for what he is rightly due.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-10 (Leaves and Passes) prescribes the policies for the leave and pass function of the Army Military Personnel System.  Paragraph 
2-3 states, in pertinent part, that Soldiers on active duty earn 30 days of leave a year with pay and allowances at the rate of 2 1?2 days a month.  This entitlement excludes periods of confinement for more than 1 day while awaiting court-martial provided Soldier is convicted.  Additionally, paragraph 2-4 of this regulation also states, in pertinent part, that payment of accrued leave is made per Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14–R.  By law, payment of accrued leave is limited to 60 days one time during a military career, unless earned in a missing status or in a special leave status (as discussed above in the advisory opinion).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for an exception to policy so he can be paid for the 72.5 days of annual leave he accumulated was carefully considered.  Although the applicant's situation is unfortunate, there are no provisions of law or regulation that allow for granting the applicant relief in this case.

2.  Title 37, USC, Section 501 and the governing regulation state that payment of unused leave may not exceed 60 days.  The applicant's situation does not fit into any of the several exceptions.

3.  Even though his DD Form 214 does not show he was paid for 60 days leave during the period covered by the DD Form 214, his LES shows he had previously been paid for 60 days of leave.  

4.  There is no available evidence showing the applicant was told he would be paid for the 72.5 days of leave he had accrued or that he was denied a request to take any of that leave.

5.  There is insufficient evidence to warrant granting the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000458



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004044



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025463

    Original file (20100025463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 December 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100025463 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In this case, the evidence confirms the applicant voluntarily elected to enter extended active duty for the purpose of obtaining sufficient service for active duty retirement. Therefore, since the applicant previously received payment for 60 days of accrued leave in 1991 there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting an exception to policy as requested by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007233C070208

    Original file (20040007233C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 September 2003 the applicant requested 128 days of leave from 25 January 2004 to 31 May 2004, 108 days of which were accrued leave, and 20 days of which were permissive TDY (25 January 2004 to 13 February 2004). The MC was further informed that there were no provisions under the law that allowed Soldiers to cash in leave after separation from military service; however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records had the authority to approve request for exceptions to policy. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021108

    Original file (20120021108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he: * lost 17.5 days of leave due to "Use/Lose" in FY 2010 * was assigned to the Warrior Transition Unit (WTU) on 19 May 2010 * was not afforded an opportunity to take leave prior to 1 October 2010 due to the number of appointments and the time between the appointments * requested permission to submit an exception to policy prior to his medical retirement on 27 May 2011, but his command denied it * is requesting an exception to policy as a Reservist who served on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005658

    Original file (20070005658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's October 2006 LES shows that he had a balance of 49.5 days of accrued leave, lost 19 days, and 17 use/lose leave. On 5 February 2007, the G1 replied to the applicant's question, "Can a Soldier without any SLA and with a leave balance of 87 days retire on 30 September and cash in 31 days of leave on 30 September and go into transition leave for the remainder of October and November"? The applicant reported for his final outprocessing on 29 September 2006, one day prior to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019779

    Original file (20110019779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This memorandum stated: a. the applicant submitted an official request for the recoupment of 15.5 days of personal leave that was surrendered upon release from active duty on 14 November 2008; and b. while under the BG's command in SOCKOR the applicant was unable to utilize all of his accrued leave due the following mitigating circumstances: * The applicant was awaiting the disposition of his case with the Department of the Army Selective Continuation Board * Personnel shortages in his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013836

    Original file (20140013836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states she lost 9 days of leave after a deployment because there was no time to take the leave. During FY 2012 she lost 9 days of leave due to being deployed in Kuwait from 4 August 2012 to 2 November 2012. While it is unfortunate that she lost 9 days of her accrued leave at the time of her retirement, she has failed to show through the evidence submitted with her application or the evidence of record that she was unjustly denied the opportunity to either sell and/or take ordinary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016942

    Original file (20100016942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Defense Finance and Accounting Service submitted a response to a congressional inquiry on 4 August 2008 and stated the applicant: * separated with 34.5 days of accrued lump sum leave * accumulated 90 days of leave on 30 September 2007 (end of fiscal year) * wasn’t entitled to special leave accrual * was only authorized to carry forward no more than 60 days of leave * lost 30 days of accrued leave on 1 October 2007 7. The evidence of record does not show the applicant has been unjustly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001370C070208

    Original file (20040001370C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Antonio Uribe | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence shows that the applicant did plan to use 22 days of accrued leave between 10 May 2003 and 31 May 2003, but that his intention was thwarted because of his medical emergency. Nonetheless, the applicant, although apparently on convalescent leave for 10 days from 6 May 2003 to 15 May 2003, although not considered authorized accrued leave as such, was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019140

    Original file (20140019140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a 20-year Regular Army retirement with maximum medical disability (100 percent) which would qualify her for concurrent retirement and disability pay. On 17 November 2011, the applicant was released from active duty and she was placed on the TDRL on the following day with a combined disability rating of 70 percent. He stated that she had 50 days of accrued leave as of 9 November 2011 and that during her career lifetime, she had cashed in 53 days of leave, thus leaving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000725

    Original file (20090000725.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It further shows that the applicant took leave upon his return from deployment and that he lost 15 days of leave. The evidence of record in this case confirms that during FY 2002 the applicant had taken 11 days of leave prior to his deployment to Puerto Rico from 24 May 2002 to 13 September 2002 and that he was denied authorization to take his previously scheduled leave upon his return from deployment because of additional unit mission requirements, which resulted in his losing 15.5 days of...