Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003628
Original file (20120003628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  21 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003628 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge.  

2.  He states:

	a.  He served honorably while he was in the active Army.  During this time, he received only $23.00 pay per month while he was in Vietnam.  When he returned from Vietnam he did not receive any pay for 2 or 3 months.

	b.  He went AWOL (absent without leave) and he got a civilian job in Birmingham, AL because he was not being paid.

	c.  He went to his captain and they checked on his pay.  They were both told his pay voucher was lost and he could not get paid until the vouchers were located.

	d.  he returned to Fort McClellan, AL after being AWOL for 3 weeks.

	e.  his discharge was too harsh for his offense.

3.  He provides:

* a petition for change of name
* a receipt from the Montgomery County Probate Court

an authorization for release of arrest record from the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office
* four character reference letters

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 December 1970.  He served in Vietnam from 24 August 1971 to 8 April 1972.

3.  His record shows he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on:

* 19 October 1972 for being AWOL from 1 to 30 September 1972
* 20 November 1972 for failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty on 11 November 1972

4.  His discharge packet is not available for review.  However, his record contains a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that shows he was discharged on 16 February 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service – in lieu of trial court-martial with issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.  He completed 1 year,
11 months, and 6 days of total active service.  His DD Form 214 also shows two periods of time lost from 1 to 29 September 1972 and from 18 December 1972 to 29 January 1973 for a total of 72 days.

5.  He provided four character reference letters from acquaintances and business associates.  They describe him as being an intelligent, dedicated, responsible, ambitious, trustworthy, and business-minded person; an excellent employee.


6.  There is no evidence the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred.  Commanders would ensure that an individual was not coerced into submitting a request for discharge for the good of the service.  Consulting counsel would advise the member concerning the elements of the offense or offenses charged, type of discharge normally given under the provisions of this chapter, the loss of Veterans Administration benefits, and the possibility of prejudice in civilian life because of the characterization of such a discharge.  An undesirable discharge certificate would normally be furnished an individual who was discharged for the good of the Service.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a states an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	c.  Paragraph 3-7b states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he went AWOL because he did not get paid for 2 or 3 months.  However, he had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief without committing the misconduct (AWOL) that appears to have led to his discharge.

2.  The applicant's record is void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge.  It appears that he was charged with the commission of an offense(s) punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge.  Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The applicant is presumed to have voluntarily, willingly, and in writing, requested discharge from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, he waived his opportunity to appear before a court-martial.  It is also presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met, and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Furthermore, in the absence of evidence showing otherwise, it must be presumed his discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.

3.  The applicant's character references are acknowledged; however, these documents are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade in this case.

4.  His service record shows he received two Article 15s and he accrued 72 days of time lost.  Based on this record of indiscipline, his service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  This misconduct and lost time rendered his service unsatisfactory.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant an honorable or a general discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003628



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003628



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018010

    Original file (20110018010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. After consulting with counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. In a statement provided with his request for discharge he stated he would go AWOL again if his request for discharge was denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021885

    Original file (20130021885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. In that statement he indicated: * he had been working to help support his mother and two little brothers prior to his being drafted in May 1971 * his mother passed away from cancer and he went into the Army * he went to Fort Ord for advanced individual training and got married in July 1971 * he then went to the Oakland Replacement Station where he went AWOL on 22 October 1971 * he was returned to Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008640

    Original file (20130008640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After consulting with counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10. a. He further acknowledged he understood that if his discharge request were accepted, he could be discharged under conditions other than honorable and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He stated that at the time they had just had their first child when he came home on leave.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025139

    Original file (20100025139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a general discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel: a. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022449

    Original file (20110022449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records show he reenlisted on 5 December 1968 for a period of 4 years. On 2 November 1970, he was discharged under provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service, with his service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. On 9 June 1972, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request to upgrade his undesirable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007153

    Original file (20090007153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 9 June 1972, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that an Undesirable Discharge Certificate be issued and that he be reduced to pay grade E-1. His military records also contain no evidence which would entitle him to a further upgrade of his discharge to honorable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088713C070403

    Original file (2003088713C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He requested a hardship discharge and the request was denied so he went absent without leave (AWOL). The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000601

    Original file (20140000601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 September 1972, the discharge authority approved his request and directed his reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, his discharge under other than honorable conditions without delay, and the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 17 April 1979 after careful consideration of his military records and all other available evidence, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) determined that he was properly discharged and denied his request for a change in the type and nature of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067024C070402

    Original file (2002067024C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. In the statement that he submitted when he requested discharge, he stated that he went AWOL because of the three other soldiers that he shared his room with, because he continued to be disapproved when he attempted to change jobs and that he was harassed when he applied for leave.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013520

    Original file (20100013520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge with full benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged on 26 June 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The available records do not show the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for...