Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003371
Original file (20120003371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  14 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003371 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a letter.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 September 1964 and he held military occupational specialty 92C (Petroleum Laboratory Specialist).  He served in Thailand from 16 April 1965 to 13 April 1966 while assigned to the 590th Quartermaster Company. 

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 15 September 1967 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of creditable active service.

4.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the National Defense Service Medal and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

5.  His record is void of any documentation that shows he was ordered to Vietnam or that his service in Thailand was in direct support of combat operations in Vietnam.

6.  The applicant provides a letter, dated 12 May 1992, from the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center to a senator wherein it stated the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star was being forwarded to the applicant.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.  Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award.   "Direct support" is defined as services being supplied the combat forces in the area of operations by ground units, ships, and aircraft providing supplies and equipment to the forces concerned, provided it involves actually entering the designated area, and ships and aircraft providing fire, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support.  Bronze service stars are not authorized for the Vietnam Service Medal when awarded for service in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to Thailand from 16 April 1965 to 13 April 1966.  However, the evidence of record does not show and he did not provide any evidence that shows he served in Vietnam for at least 1 day or that his service in Thailand was in direct support of combat operations in Vietnam.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the requested relief.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003371





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003371



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005279

    Original file (20120005279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant's unit served in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has provided no evidence which shows that while serving in Thailand he served in direct support of operations in Vietnam as defined by the awards regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016783

    Original file (20090016783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant requests his military records be corrected to show a combat duty assignment while assigned to Thailand and a TDY assignment in Vietnam in May 1968, the governing regulation states that there is no provision to show any assignment other than the unit of assignment upon separation on the DD Form 214. Therefore, his military records should be corrected to show the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001780

    Original file (20130001780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commercial awards listings provided by the applicant list the basic eligibility requirements for award of the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and state that all recipients of the Vietnam Service Medal are authorized the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. The applicant's records show service in Thailand from 23 May 1962 through 15 July 1963. Therefore, he has not established that he is authorized award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000343

    Original file (20130000343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. The applicant’s records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 April 1966. However, there is insufficient evidence that shows his service was in direct support of operations in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000675

    Original file (20110000675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * A silver and a bronze service star to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal * The Meritorious Unit Commendation instead of the Meritorious Unit Citation * His home of record (HOR) as "305 C----h Street" instead of "309 C----h Street" 2. The applicant completed two periods of foreign service in Thailand, not in Vietnam. The applicant's OMPF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015463

    Original file (20090015463.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Special Forces (SF) Tab, Vietnam Service Medal, and other related campaign awards if appropriate. The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 June 1968 does not show the SF Tab, Vietnam Service Medal, or any other Vietnam service-related awards. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003937

    Original file (20120003937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspace there over during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award. Regretfully, there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant met the criteria for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012192

    Original file (20120012192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and any other awards he may be entitled to. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show the VSM, RVN Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010481

    Original file (20100010481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspace there over during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award. In the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he arrived in and departed from Vietnam, there is insufficient evidence to support awarding him the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009101

    Original file (20090009101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his service in Korat, Thailand, should be recognized as "in direct support of operations in Vietnam." The applicant submitted a copy of the 4th Maintenance Battalion Morning Report, dated 27 January 1966, which reported him returning from a TDY status to the 9th Logistical Command, Thailand. However, there is insufficient evidence that shows his service was in direct support of operations in Vietnam.