Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003137
Original file (20120003137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003137 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Vietnam service.  He also requests the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and any other awards or citations to which he may be entitled added to his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant states he was assigned to a unit in Okinawa and he served as an advisor to train South Vietnam villagers.  This required several trips into Vietnam for different durations and during these tours he was exposed to Agent Orange and now suffers from diabetes.  He needs his DD Form 214 corrected so he can obtain benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

3.  The applicant provides:

* a letter from the Veterans Service Commission of Belmont County, OH, dated 8 August 2012
* his DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 


Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 February 1967 for a period of 3 years.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 16B (Hercules missile crewman).

3.  On 28 January 1970, he was honorably released from active duty and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation.  He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 9 days of total active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in:

* item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) he served 1 year, 5 months, and
28 days of foreign service in the U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)
* item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) no medals or citations for Vietnam-related service

4.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Okinawa from 26 August 1967 through 23 February 1969, that equates to 1 year, 5 months, and 28 days of foreign service.

5.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he spent any time in Vietnam.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states:

	a.  The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.  Qualifying service also included temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days in Vietnam or contiguous areas, except that the time limit may be waived for personnel participating in actual combat operations.


	b.  Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for the Vietnam Service Medal.  "Direct support" is defined as services being supplied the combat forces in the area of operations by ground units, ships, and aircraft providing supplies and equipment to the forces concerned, provided it involves actually entering the designated area, and ships and aircraft providing fire, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support.

	c.  The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he made several trips to Vietnam during his assignment in Okinawa.

2.  Evidence shows he served in Okinawa from 26 August 1967 to 23 February 1969 which is properly shown in item 22c of his DD Form 214.

3.  There is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence that shows he was assigned or attached to a unit in Vietnam or that he was on temporary duty status in Vietnam during his tenure of service.  In the absence of any corroborating evidence, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003137



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003137



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040004995C070208

    Original file (040004995C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show his overseas service, especially his service in Vietnam, and award of the Air Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. The applicant’s overseas service is documented on his DD Form 214; however, and despite his award of the Air Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal, his periods of service in Vietnam cannot be substantiated. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019624

    Original file (20110019624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the periods ending 1 July 1970 and 2 April 1973 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Letter from the Office of the Chief of Transportation * Letter from a former chief * Extract of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the detachment may have sailed out of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020186

    Original file (20100020186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his service in Vietnam with the 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, the unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation, for service from 6 to 23 November 1967 based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 5, dated 1979; and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006528

    Original file (20120006528.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states there is no record on file of him serving in these countries except the records he provides with this application. Qualifying service for this award includes service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011428

    Original file (20080011428.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his service record shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam and Okinawa, but his DD Form 214 only shows Foreign Service in USARPAC (United States Army, Pacific). Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, prescribes that the DD Form 214 should show the Soldier's total active duty outside continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019473

    Original file (20130019473.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following corrections to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Adding his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Showing no lost time in item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost) * Showing in item 30 (Remarks) that he had no lost time * Showing in item 30 that he served in Vietnam during the period 4 April 1969 – 3 April 1970 * Showing in item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) all of his foreign service * Adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005279

    Original file (20120005279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant's unit served in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has provided no evidence which shows that while serving in Thailand he served in direct support of operations in Vietnam as defined by the awards regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001039

    Original file (20100001039.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following: * Vietnam service in item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) * Award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, one overseas service bar, and the Combat Medical Badge 2. The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not reflect dates he served in Vietnam. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030341

    Original file (20100030341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy. This service is not currently reflected in item 30 of his DD Form 214 and should be added at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying period of honorable service from 24 February 1964 to 23 February 1967; b. amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018940

    Original file (20130018940.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The fact that subsequent to service the applicant requested a name change, which was denied, does not provide sufficiently mitigating basis for changing the information recorded in the military records, which were correct at the time the applicant performed military service. Based on his service in Vietnam, he is also entitled to correction of item 30 of his DD Form 214 to show he served in Vietnam from 7 June 1967 - 30 April 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...