Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002982
Original file (20120002982.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  14 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120002982 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show this medal and to show he served in primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman) for 3 years, 3 months, and 23 days instead of 2 years and 11 months.

2.  He states he served over 3 years with no nonjudicial punishment or other disciplinary action against him but never received the Army Good Conduct Medal.  He attempted to contact his S-1 and the unit refused to assist him because he was no longer on active duty.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214 and a letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command to his elected representative indicating he had not provided sufficient evidence to support awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  His military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 February 2006.  He completed initial entry training and was awarded MOS 11C on an unknown date; his records do not contain MOS orders.  The highest rank/grade he held on active duty was specialist/E-4.

2.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 24 May 2009 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He completed 3 years, 3 months, and 23 days of total active service.

3.  His DD Form 214 shows "11C1O INDIRECT FIRE INFANTRY 2 YRS 11 MOS" in item 11 (Primary Specialty).

4.  His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  It does, however, show he was awarded two Army Commendation Medals.

5.  Orders B-08-005110 published by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 4 August 2010, show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5 in the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 4 August 2010.

6.  His records are void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal by proper authority.  His records are also void of any evidence of adverse actions or a disqualification by his chain of command for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It states to enter the titles of all MOS's served for at least 1 year and include for each MOS the number of years and months served.  For the time determination, 16 days or more count as a month.  Do not count basic training and advanced individual training.  For an enlisted Soldier, also specify the first five characters of the primary MOS code, which includes the three characters of the MOS, the fourth character of skill and grade level in the MOS, and the fifth character of a special qualification identifier, if applicable.  Enter "O" when not applicable.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service.  He attained the rank of specialist and was awarded two Army Commendation Medals.  There is no record of any disciplinary action or disqualification by his chain of command for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  He was then promoted to the rank of sergeant 1 year later in the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  As such, it is reasonable to presume he distinguished himself by his conduct, efficiency, and fidelity and met the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 2 February 2006 through 1 February 2009 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

2.  Initial entry training is not counted in determining years and months for each MOS served.  Based on the available evidence, it appears the difference between the 2 years and 11 months shown in item 11 and his total active service of 3 years, 3 months, and 23 days accounts for his initial entry training.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 2 February 2006 through 1 February 2009 and adding this award to his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so 


much of the application that pertains to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he served in PMOS 11C for 3 years, 3 months, and 23 days.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002982



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002982



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011371

    Original file (20080011371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records to show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and his DA Form 20 does not list the Combat Infantryman Badge in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge because he served as a gunner of an M-60 machine gun and he was involved in numerous missions while under hostile enemy fire during the period January 1971...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005116

    Original file (20140005116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 documenting this period of service shows he was awarded MOS 11C1P and held this MOS for 2 years and 8 months. A DD Form 214 shows he served on active duty from 10 to 14 June 1991. Although the record shows he held PMOS 11C1P when he was ordered to active duty on 16 June 1991, it appears he was awarded MOS 75B1O during this period of active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003676

    Original file (20130003676.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Orders Number 92, issued by Headquarters, 210th Combat Aviation Battalion, dated 27 July 1967, withdrew his Primary MOS (PMOS) of 11C and awarded him PMOS 76U and Secondary MOS (SMOS) 11C, under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), effective 17 May 1967. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214, which provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000389

    Original file (20150000389.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a DA Form 20 that shows in: a. item 22 (MOS) he was awarded PMOS 11C on 20 January 1970; b. item 22 he was awarded PMOS 71B on 15 July 1970; c. item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 12 February to 15 June 1970; d. item 38 (Record of Assignments) while serving in Vietnam he was assigned to Company E, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment from 27 February to 15 June 1970 in duty MOS 11C1O; e. item 38 that he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006947C071108

    Original file (20070006947C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests in effect, that the MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman) be added to his DD form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty). Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he was awarded the MOS 94B, Cook, as his primary MOS on 28 March 1969. The applicant’s DA Form 20 confirms he was trained in and awarded MOS 94B (Cook) and that he was assigned to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001414

    Original file (20150001414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains an NGB 22-5 (Addendum to DD Form 4 - Approval and Acceptance by Service Representative for Interstate Transfer in the ARNG), dated 8 April 2008, wherein the applicant acknowledged having voluntarily transferred to the IDARNG with continued membership in the ARNG for the period remaining on his current enlistment, with ETS of 12 October 2012. Oregon Military Department, Joint Force Headquarters, Oregon National Guard, Orders 121-055, dated 30 April 2008, show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005611

    Original file (20130005611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000040

    Original file (20110000040.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He served in the RVN from 22 March through 28 May 1968; this service equals 2 months and 6 days; c. He was a patient in the 7th Field Hospital, Japan, from 29 May through 1 August 1968; this service equals 64 days; d. He was transferred to Letterman Hospital, Fort Irwin, CA, and he was later returned to duty; e. He was awarded MOS 64B2O (Heavy Truck Driver) and he drove a bus during the period 4 October through 9 December 1968; f. He was transferred to Headquarters and Headquarters Company...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086179C070212

    Original file (2003086179C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with an ending date of 31 March 1989 to show: Therefore, there is insufficient evidence upon which to correct his records to show he held MOS 11C for 23 years and 7 months. That so much of the application as it relates to correction of his DD Form 214, with an ending date of 31 March 1989, to show he held PMOS 67V for 16 years; MOS 67Y for 6 years and 3 months; MOS 67N for 17 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001031

    Original file (20140001031 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SGT (E-5) and awarded MOS 05C4O; however, item 23a of his DD Form 214 shows MOS 05C2O. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal...