Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002909
Original file (20120002909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  23 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120002909 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award.

2.  He states:

	a.  he has not been able to locate any documentation, squad members, or medical personnel involved in the event pertaining to his request;

	b.  the incident occurred between September 1969 and April 1970, while he was assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment,
101st Airborne Division in Vietnam;

	c.  he recalls being knocked unconscious while loading into a helicopter that was hit by a missile round;

	d.  he recalled others were injured and he sustained injuries to his wrist and he was treated by the medic from his base camp;

	e.  he thought the appropriate paperwork regarding his injuries was taken care of, but he never heard anything, and all he has left as memories are the scars; and

	f.  he is being seen weekly for post-traumatic stress disorder and this incident is his main point of discussion.
3.  He submitted his:

* DD Form 214
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 November 1968.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (light weapons infantryman).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 20 April 1969 through 1 April 1970;

	b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to:

* Company A, 2d Battalion (Airborne), 505th Infantry Regiment, 3d Brigade, 82d Airborne Division in Vietnam from 3 May to 22 October 1969
* Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion (Airmobile), 506th Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam from
27 October 1969 to 28 March 1970

	d.  item 40 (Wounds) no entry (blank); and

	e.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for the Purple Heart.


4.  On 5 November 1970, he was honorably released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  He completed 2 years of total active service.  His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

5.  His record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 22 February 2010, that corrected item 24 of his 5 November 1970 DD Form 214 to show awarded of the Bronze Star Medal and Army Commendation Medal with 1st oak leaf cluster.

6.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

7.  Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

8.  There are no medical records in his official military personnel file that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The regulation governing award of Purple Heart indicates the wound for which the award is being made must have been a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

2.  Regrettably, there is no evidence in the applicant's record and he provided insufficient evidence to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action.


3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

4.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002909



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002909



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010274

    Original file (20110010274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 March 1969. Army Regulation 672-5-2 (Awards), in effect at the time, states the Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the: * Purple Heart, for wounds incurred in action in Vietnam on 25 June 1970 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023034

    Original file (20120023034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 August 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120023034 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021193

    Original file (20090021193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains (and he also provides copies of) three separate general orders showing he was awarded the Purple Heart (First Award) for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 24 August 1969. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Records show that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015585

    Original file (20060015585.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show that he was awarded two Purple Hearts. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022786

    Original file (20120022786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) and item 38 (Record of Assignments), that he was assigned to Vietnam from 12 November 1968 to 12 November 1969 and served with Company B, 1st Battalion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024600

    Original file (20110024600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 June 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110024600 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070011559 on 20 December 2007. Therefore, he should be awarded the Purple Heart for wound received in action in Vietnam on 14 January 1970 and his DD Form 214 should...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003522

    Original file (20150003522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003522 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He states the Board denied his request for award of the Purple Heart based on the available evidence. There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant should be awarded the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088395C070403

    Original file (2003088395C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000496

    Original file (20090000496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Further, my Army medical records clearly state, 'frag in tongue' more than once!" Records show that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Although evidence shows the applicant sustained a shrapnel injury to his tongue while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, that the injury was treated by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment was made a matter of official record, there is no corroborating evidence present in the available records which shows the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000743C070206

    Original file (20050000743C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, and the applicant has not provided evidence, such as accounts from his chain of command at the time or medical personnel who treated his wounds, that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the applicant records that show he was awarded 10 awards of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....