IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 9 August 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002880
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of item 3 (Social Security Number) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
2. The applicant states the Social Security Number (SSN) on his DD Form 214 is incorrect and he is being denied benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as a result.
3. The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants entire military service record has not been made available to the Board. This case is being considered using the applicants DD Form 214 and documents provided by the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) which include a DD Form 47 (Record of Induction), DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), and various miscellaneous orders.
3. The DD Form 47 on file shows the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 September 1965. This document lists a Service Number (SN) which was the primary identification number used in military records at the time. It does not list an SSN.
4. The DA Form 20 in the file also lists an SN and not an SSN. All the available orders also list an SN in the standard name line and none list an SSN.
5. On 22 September 1967, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The
DD Form 214 he was issued lists the SSN he now claims is incorrect in item 3.
6. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army. It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's separation stated the
DA Form 20 and documents on file in the MPRJ were the primary source for information for entries on the DD Form 214.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the SSN he now uses has been carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim. None of the available documents, other than the DD Form 214, list an SSN and there is no evidence available to indicate the applicant served under the SSN he now uses.
2. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The information contained therein should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created and under which the military service was performed. Therefore, the SSN listed in the applicant's military records should not be changed at this time.
3. This Record of Proceedings will be filed in his military record to provide clarity and to deal with any confusion that may arise regarding the difference in the SSN under which he performed his military service and was separated vice the SSN he indicates he now uses. Filing the Board's decisional document will also guarantee the historical integrity of the applicant's military record.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ ___X___ ___X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002880
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002880
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013577
BOARD DATE: 14 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013577 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the first and middle names recorded in his military records be corrected. However, while the validity of the name he claims is correct is not in question, the record shows he entered, served, and was separated under the first and middle names that are listed on his DD Form 47, DA Form 20, and all documents on file in his OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001437
When he went into the service, he was issued an SSN by the Army. Item 3 (SSN) of his DD Form 214 shows his SSN as "9XX-XX-1193." The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 17 September 1969.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019890
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service number (SN) and social security number (SSN) as "xxx-xx-0xxx" instead of the entry "NONE" and "xxx-xx-8xxx", respectively. Item 3 (SSN) of the DD Form 214 contained in his official military personnel file shows the entry "xxx-xx-8xxx." The documents in his military service records show he served in the Army using SSN "xxx-xx-8xxx."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019372
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It also contains a USAAC Form 170, dated 29 October 1967, almost 2 months after his release from active duty, in which he requested the SSN he now claims is incorrect be added to his record and confirms the SSN he now claims is incorrect is the one under which he entered military service, performed his military service, and was separated from military service. As a result, given it is clear the SSN...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016212
His record contains a DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) that does not list an SSAN because it was not used at the time. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared on 31 October 1966 upon his entry on active duty lists the SN he now claims is incorrect in item 1 (Name and Service Number). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 25 October 1966, as evidence by the DD Form 47 on file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011524
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, the SSN listed in the applicant's military records should not be changed at this time. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011524 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011524 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004461
The applicant requests the Social Security Number (SSN) and name recorded in his military records and on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which was prepared upon entry on active duty on 8 October 1971 lists his first and middle names as he now claims are incorrect and the SSN that he now claims is incorrect in item 1 (Name and Service Number). The applicant's request that his military records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021383
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021383 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The orders and documents in the applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket that contain an SSN, with the exception of one document, list the SSN the applicant now claims is incorrect. However, it is clear the applicant's active duty service was performed under the SSN recorded in his military records that he now claims was in error.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000947
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It appears the applicant did not have his SSN card when he enlisted and he was issued the TIN of "9xx-0x-2xxx." ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110000947 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110000947 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007693
The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) and DD Form 1584 (National Agency Check Request) prepared on him at the Reception Station, Fort Polk, Louisiana, on 21 July 1970 also list the SSN he now claims is incorrect in item 1 (Name and Service Number) and item 4 (Social Security Number), respectively. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time lists the SSN he now claims is incorrect in item 3. Although the Social Security card and Social Security Administration print-out provided by...