Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001999
Original file (20120001999.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001999 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected Option C (Immediate Coverage) for the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).

2.  The applicant states he completed and submitted the DD Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) without adequate counseling about the cost differential versus the benefit.  He did not know that if anything happened to him prior to age 60 his son would not be covered under RCSBP.  If he had Option C coverage he would have peace of mind knowing his son would receive a portion of his retired pay through an annuity.  Also, in the event he remarried, he would want to be able to change his election to Option C for spouse and child coverage to ensure his spouse would be covered in the event of his passing.

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum, DD Form 2656-5, an email, and a statement of support.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he was born on 8 October 1963.  Having had prior enlisted service in the Army National Guard (ARNG), his records show he was appointed as a Reserve officer in the ARNG and executed an Oath of Office on 8 August 1992.  He served in staff and leadership positions and attained the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC).  On 29 September 2010, he transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).
2.  On 10 March 2011, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) issued him a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Twenty-Year Letter).  This memorandum notified him that he had completed the required years of service and he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Enclosed with this letter was a DD Form 2656-5 which notified him that he was entitled to participate in the RCSBP and that "by law" he had only 90 calendar days from the date he received this letter to submit his RCSBP election. 

3.  On 7 June 2011, he completed a DD Form 2656-5, wherein he indicated he was unmarried at the time with one dependent child, born on 12 April 1994.  This form also shows he elected "child only" full coverage under Option B (deferred annuity).

4.  The applicant provides:

	a.  An email, dated 18 November 2011, wherein an official at HRC stated the applicant contacted HRC in August 2011 requesting that his RCSBP election be changed to Option C.  His request was made outside of the 90 day window; therefore, it was denied.

	b.  A statement of support, undated, from LTC KC, a USAR Retirement Services Officer, wherein she stated she met with the applicant in June 2011 to counsel him on the implications of his RCSBP election options, but it was after he had submitted his DD Form 2656-5.  She further stated the applicant was 48 years of age and his son was 17 years of age.  The applicant did not understand that by electing Option B (deferred annuity) his son would never draw an annuity because he would not be eligible to do so at the time after the applicant would have turned 60 years of age.  In addition, she shared with him that should he get remarried or have another child, he could fill out a DD Form 2656-6 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Change Certificate) and add coverage for a spouse or update information on other children.

5.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an 
annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday;  (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  A member must have made the


election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60.  Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. 

6.  Children are eligible for SBP payments as long as they are unmarried, under age 18, or under age 22 if still in school.  A child who is disabled and incapable of self-support remains eligible if the disability occurred before age 18 (or before age 22 if a full time student). 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant executed a DD Form 2656-5 on 7 June 2011, electing "child only" coverage under Option B (deferred annuity).  At the time, he was unmarried and had a child who was 17 years of age.  

2.  It appears he did not fully understand the ramifications of electing Option B coverage at the time he executed the DD Form 2656-5 on 7 June 2011 and was not properly advised on the option most beneficial to his child prior to making his election.  It is irrational to believe he would have elected Option B if he knew that by the time he would have turned age 60 his child would not be eligible to receive an annuity.

3.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he elected "child only" coverage under Option C (immediate coverage) on 7 June 2011.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he elected "child only" full coverage under Option C (immediate coverage) when he completed his DD Form 2656-5 on 7 June 2011.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001999



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001999



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006453

    Original file (20070006453.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that upon retirement from the Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG), he was unmarried and thus elected the children only coverage of the Reserve Component SBP. This application was dated 2 March 2007 by the applicant and received by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 27 April 2007. On 20 December 2005, HRC emailed DFAS (responding to HRC's email dated 14 November 2005) and asked "If the FSM elects to cover spouse during the open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021995

    Original file (20120021995.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he completed the DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) on 8 August 1990, he was not married at that time. Section XII of the DD Form 2656 specifies that the spouse's concurrence is required with the member is married and does not elect full spouse coverage or declines coverage. However, the applicant's record should be corrected to show his SBP coverage is for child-only coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015593

    Original file (20130015593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If documentation had been requested, he would have known that his daughter was not an eligible beneficiary and by law he would not have been able to participate in the RCSBP. It requires courts to "hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions" that are "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law." The Board concluded: * the member's military service records did not contain evidence of marital status (e.g., divorce decree)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021011

    Original file (20120021011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Defense Finance and Accounting System (DFAS) provided a copy of a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 28 December 1994, which shows in Section II (Marital/Dependency Status) the applicant indicated he was married and had dependent children and elected SBP coverage for "children only," Option C (Immediate Coverage). DFAS also provided a copy of a DD Form 2656, dated 28 July 2011, wherein the applicant listed his status as "married" with no dependent children. In Section XI...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008509

    Original file (20130008509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options were available: * elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation * elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60, but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; or * elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60 Once a member elects either option B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. The evidence of record shows the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002452

    Original file (20090002452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records contain a DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data) which shows he had dependent children at the time he received his twenty-year letter and made no election on their behalf. The applicant provided the first two pages of a DD Form 2656-5, indicating the FSM's intentions would have been to elect to participate in the RCSBP with spouse and child coverage based on full retired pay and immediate annuity coverage at his death. The date stamp also shows that the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011157

    Original file (20070011157.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her husband's records, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "Natural person with insurable interest-mother" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant provided the following documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 1883, dated 19 July 1994; b. DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019028

    Original file (20080019028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 January 2008, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) in which he elected spouse-only coverage, option C, full retired pay. However, although he divorced and later remarried on 7 May 1993, he still would not have been eligible to change his SBP election to include spouse coverage within 1 year as he contends he was informed because he had already been afforded an opportunity to elect spouse coverage and he and his then spouse elected not to do so. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020844

    Original file (20120020844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests enrollment in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for "spouse and child" coverage, Option C. 2. His record contains a transaction history which shows he received a 20-year letter on 19 October 2000 but did not make an RCSBP election, then he got married on 24 June 2004 but did not make an RCSBP election within the one year anniversary date. The evidence of record shows that upon receiving his 20-year letter on 19 October 2000, the applicant did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016615

    Original file (20130016615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. DD Form 2656-6, dated 31 August 2013, that shows the applicant requested a change in SBP coverage from Child Only to Spouse and Children based on marriage and acquiring a dependent. The applicant states in his application that he printed out a DD Form 149 and sent it in December 2009, which would indicate that he applied to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) at that time. Moreover, an application to the ABCMR would not have been appropriate at that time since the...