Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001946
Original file (20120001946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  10 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001946 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his enlistment contracts, dated 24 July 2009 and 22 July 2011, to show he enlisted in the rank and pay grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states that he was told at the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) that he could turn his promotion orders in to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) after he arrived at his unit and his rank and pay grade would be taken care of.  However, DFAS would not accept his orders because he had a break in service and his pay grade reflected on his enlistment contract was E-4.  He further states he provided a copy of his promotion orders to his recruiter at the recruiting station and it was not his fault that they were not available at the MEPS.  He also states his pay and future promotion eligibility have been affected.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a request to correct his grade/time in grade; DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 24 July 2009 and 22 July 2011; and discharge orders, dated 6 June 2008.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 June 2000 for a period of 4 years, training as an airborne infantryman, and a cash enlistment bonus.  He completed one-station unit training at Fort Benning, Georgia, and was transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for his first and only assignment.

2.  He was advanced to pay grade E-4 on 1 January 2002 and he served in Afghanistan and Iraq.

3.  On 30 July 2004, he was honorably released from active duty due to completion of his required service and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his statutory service obligation.

4.  On 6 January 2006, he was voluntarily transferred to a USAR troop program unit in Corapolis, Pennsylvania.  On 1 October 2006, he was promoted to the rank of SGT/E-5.

5.  On 6 June 2008, he was honorably discharged from the USAR in pay grade E-5 due to the expiration of his term of service.

6.  On 24 July 2009, he enlisted in the USAR in Denver, Colorado, in pay grade E-4 for a period of 1 year.  On 22 July 2010, he extended his enlistment for a period of 1 year.

7.  On 22 July 2011, he reenlisted in the USAR in pay grade E-4 for a period of 3 years.

8.  A staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Department of the Army Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, in the processing of this case which recommends approval of the applicant's request because he did not need a grade determination at the time and should have been enlisted in pay grade E-5.  Accordingly, both contracts need to be amended to reflect his pay grade as E-5.

9.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and he concurred with the opinion.

10.  A review of his official records failed to show a copy of the applicant's promotion orders and his USAR enlistment contracts.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention has been noted and appears to have merit.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of SGT/E-5 on 1 October 2006.  He was discharged from the USAR on 6 June 2008 and again enlisted in the USAR 24 July 2009.  However, it appears that he was erroneously enlisted in pay grade E-4 instead of E-5, both on 24 July 2009 and 22 July 2011.

2.  Accordingly, both of his enlistment contracts should be amended to show he enlisted in pay grade E-5 and he is entitled to all back pay and allowances that flow from this change.

BOARD VOTE:

___X___  ___X_____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant's enlistment contracts (DD Form 4), dated 24 July 2009 and 22 July 2011, to show he enlisted in pay grade E-5 and he is entitled to all pay and allowances that flow from this change.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _________X________________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001946



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001946



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008105

    Original file (20090008105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008105 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, accelerated promotion to sergeant (SGT) under the Army Civilian Acquired Skills Program (ACASP).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002759

    Original file (20130002759.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he has not received any retired pay for the period 1 April 2009 through 19 August 2009 * his attempts to reenlist were not the result of a willful or self-desired choice to change his military occupational specialty (MOS) but rather an attempt to secure financial stability * he has no desire to change his MOS and protested the idea * he was placed on the TDRL in 2007 * on 30 April 2009, he was found fit and ordered back to active duty * his orders and instructions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015475

    Original file (20090015475.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was never paid at the correct enlisted pay grade although his enlistment contract clearly shows he enlisted as a PFC. The applicant provides in support of his application a copy of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) and allied documents, dated 17 November 2006; a copy of his SGLV Form 8286 Servicemembers Group Life Insurance Certificate), dated 30 March 2007; a copy of Orders 229-1026, issued by the Joint Forces Headquarters, NYARNG, on 26 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011041

    Original file (20130011041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    g. His recruiter told him he had to ship from Germany and he could keep an eye on him and that based on the orders so would his family. c. Records indicate the applicant was recommended for promotion to SGT in MOS 68Q by a promotion board in August 2010 and again in August 2011. The evidence shows he was promoted to SGT on 1 August 2012 in the USAR in MOS 68Q and he enlisted in the RA on 27 November 2012 for MOS 68Q.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019171

    Original file (20110019171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) for staff sergeant (SSG). The applicant states: * He wants his DOR adjusted so he can be eligible for the next sergeant first class promotion board * He was promoted to SSG on 1 April 1999 while serving in the Regular Army (RA) * He left the service in February 2004 and came back in March 2008 * He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and accepted a reduction of grade to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 because of his 4-year break in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014251

    Original file (20080014251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her military records be corrected to show that she enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 June 2006 in the rank and pay grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. The applicant's military records show that after having prior service in the Regular Army and United States Army Reserve (USAR), she enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 October 1985 in the rank of private first class/E-3. The applicant's record is not clear regarding her service from 26 September 2002...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017748

    Original file (20080017748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also states, in effect, that a memorandum completed in accordance with Army Regulation 25-50 and a copy of his current Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) physical examination was not submitted to get his grade determination but were required per Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), paragraph 4-22, dated 16 May 2005. Paragraph 3-17 of Army Regulation 601-210 pertains to enlistment pay grade for applicants with prior military service who are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008230

    Original file (20110008230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he is eligible for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) as stated in his enlistment contract. The applicant's military records should be corrected to show his SLRP Addendum was amended to include the statement, "If you enlist for the SLRP and the government fails to verify that you meet the eligibility criteria for entitlement to the SLRP, and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by the SLRP or the repayment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015948

    Original file (20090015948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in the grade and rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 with a date of rank of 29 May 2008. The evidence does show the applicant accepted the determination that he would be enlisted in pay grade E-4 and did so in May 2008. As noted in the advisory opinion, the applicant enlisted in the RA as an SPC/E-4 for MOS 25B and had he disclosed his action with the Board for Correction of Naval Records, he would have...