Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001809
Original file (20120001809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  24 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001809 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Action Badge for her actions in Iraq on 12 April 2007.

2.  The applicant states she believes she met the criteria for the Combat Action Badge for her actions in Iraq involving a suicide bomber.  She has submitted multiple requests dating back to 2008 after she realized the award had never been submitted by her unit while in Iraq.  There have been many delays, resubmissions, and two letters of disapproval.  She is including letters of support from her unit's deputy commander and section leader.

3.  The applicant provides two letters of support, a memorandum, a letter, a certificate, and DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show she was a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) lieutenant colonel (LTC) civil affairs officer.  She was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom as a member of her Reserve unit and entered active duty on 20 September 2006.

3.  She served in Iraq from 18 November 2006 to 9 November 2007 while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 358th Civil Affairs Brigade.

4.  She was released from active duty on 10 February 2008 by reason of completion of required active service.  She completed 1 year, 4 months, and 21 days of creditable active service during this period of service.

5.  On 17 November 2008, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) denied a request from her unit commander for award of the Combat Action Badge to the applicant.  The HRC official stated that the Combat Action Badge was "awarded to provide special recognition to Soldiers who personally engaged, or are engaged by the enemy.  Although the eyewitness statements submitted indicate [the Applicant] was located inside the same compound in which the suicide attack occurred, there is no indication that [the Applicant] could have reasonably been injured by the explosion.  Therefore, she is not considered to have been personally engaged by the enemy."

6.  On 8 September 2009, she was assigned to the Retired Reserve.

7.  The applicant provides a:

	a.  DA Form 638, dated 25 July 2007, wherein it shows she was awarded a Bronze Star Medal for her actions on 12 April 2007.  The citation page stated, "In recognition of her achievement in response to a suicide bomb attack at the Iraqi Conference Center, Iraq, on 12 April 2007, which wounded and killed Iraqi government and civilian personnel.  [The Applicant] directed her staff to enter the attack site and conduct life-saving first aid and triage to multiple individuals.  [The Applicant's] selfless concern for the traumatized and wounded reflects her dedication to duty, loyalty to her unit and skill level, and is a credit to herself the officer corps, and the United States Army."

	b.  Letter of support, dated 2 January 2012, wherein the deputy commander of the 358th Civil Affairs Brigade during the deployment to Iraq in 2007 stated he supports the award of the Combat Action Badge to the applicant for her actions during the suicide bomb attack on 12 April 2007.  He further stated although it was accurate that the applicant was not in the blast area of the initial explosion she responded immediately and before security personnel had cleared the area.  Additional explosives were later found on the scene, and security personnel subsequently directed the area be cleared due to the continued threat.  Had the applicant remained in the separate, secure location, outside the initial blast area he would concur that the award was not warranted.  As she voluntarily entered the engagement area it was significantly different from being a passive observer of enemy action.

	c.  Letter of support, dated 17 January 2012, wherein the applicant's former section leader stated he supports the award of the Combat Action Badge to the applicant.  He further stated the blast caused many injuries and death to those directly in the blast radius.  The applicant was not in the immediate blast radius but was close by in the same compound.  He was not present at the incident, but received statements from Iraqi physicians who were present.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the requirements for award of the Combat Action Badge are branch and MOS immaterial.  Assignment to a combat arms unit or a unit organized to conduct close or offensive combat operations or performing offensive combat operations is not required to qualify for the Combat Action Badge.  However, it is not intended to award the Combat Action Badge to all Soldiers who serve in a combat zone or imminent danger area.  The Soldier must be performing assigned duties in an area where hostile fire pay or imminent danger pay is authorized.  The Soldier must be personally present and actively engaging or being engaged by the enemy and performing satisfactorily in accordance with the prescribed rules of engagement.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The criteria for award of the Combat Action Badge requires that the Soldier must be personally present and actively engaging or being engaged by the enemy and performing satisfactorily in accordance with the prescribed rules of engagement.  

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was not in the immediate blast area at the time of the suicide bomb attack but close by in the same compound.  She responded immediately after the blast, entered the attack site with her staff, and conducted life-saving first aid and triage to multiple individuals.  



3.  Although it is noted that she entered the attack site voluntarily and prior to the area being cleared by security personnel, she did so after the blast.  There is no evidence that shows she actively engaged or was engaged by the enemy.  While her actions were commendable, they do not meet the criteria for award of the Combat Action Badge. 

4.  There is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Action Badge in this case.  Therefore, she is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001809





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001809



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012870C080213

    Original file (20070012870C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in two applications, that he be awarded the Combat Action Badge (CAB) and the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). The applicant provides a self-authored statement; a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting award of the CAB with an attached award packet; a Combat Medical Badge Statement with three sworn statements, his deployment orders with an amendment, and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 29 September 2005; two...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017518

    Original file (20080017518.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a checklist for submission of request(s) for the Combat Action Badge; a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) for a Soldier, not herself; a Kansas National Guard Medal of Excellence for exceptional meritorious service and valor in combat while serving as a Combat Medic in Operation Iraqi Freedom; State of New York Orders Number 025-044, dated 25 January 2006; State of New York Orders Number 081-197, dated 22 March 2007, amending State of New York Orders Number 025-044, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006533

    Original file (20080006533.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Action Badge (CAB). The applicant also states that despite substantial documentation that he submitted to Headquarters, U.S. Army (USA) Human Resources Command (HRC), his request was disapproved due to “not being in danger of injury from ground explosions.” The applicant further states that the application was based on the fact that the aircraft he was piloting was being fired upon by insurgent ground forces, which was continually...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000088

    Original file (20110000088.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was awarded the Combat Action Badge (CAB) for his service in Iraq. The convoy manifest, dated 7 November 2007, and an attached convoy order as provided by the applicant, indicates the applicant was traveling in a convoy when a gun truck hit an IED which exploded. The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show award of the CAB for his service in Iraq because he was engaged by the enemy while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018091

    Original file (20110018091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 November 2008 he was ordered to active duty as a field artillery CPT and he served until he was REFRAD on 23 November 2010. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. Based on the evidence submitted with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028649

    Original file (20100028649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * his original 2006 submission packet for the Combat Action Badge * a letter, dated 17 April 2007, from HRC * his second submission, dated 31 July 2008, for the Combat Action Badge * a letter, dated 30 July 2009, from HRC * submission package for Major P____e and approval for the Combat Action Badge * his IG complaint, dated 13 October 2009, and response, dated 7 January 2010 * a timeline of his submission for the award of the Combat Action Badge * sworn statement,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007354

    Original file (20140007354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140007354 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The Commander stated that during two 57 millimeter rocket attacks on COS Warrior the applicant immediately moved to the sound of the blasts and treated those wounded by the shrapnel within 1-2 minutes, unknown if still under rocket fire or not, and long before an all clear sounded. The statements indicate he arrived on the scene after the explosions and performed treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009534

    Original file (20100009534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states the following: a. cites, in part, the regulatory criteria for the approving the CAB as indicated in Army Regulation 600-8-22; b. on 3 June 2005, the Military Awards Branch (MAB) issued processing procedures for award of the CAB which indicates for those recommendations made for combat related incidents involving attacks by mortar, to state in the accompanying narrative, the proximity of the Soldier to the impacted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012519

    Original file (20130012519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * his statement of the incident of 29 September 2011 * his statement of the incident of 7 October 2011 * email endorsement from LTC K, dated 4 June 2012 * Commander's Recommended Approval, DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 20 June 2012 * Sworn statements from MAJ FDR, Chief Warrant Officer Two P, Sergeant (SGT) V, SGT F, SGT W, and SGT C * two Officer Evaluation Reports (OER) * Officer Record Brief (ORB) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. When the applicant provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001105

    Original file (20150001105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 4 June 2002, wherein it shows he enlisted in the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) in the rank of SPC on that date for a period of 5 years and 30 weeks. His record contains a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 3 December 2004, wherein his immediate commander recommended him for award of the Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) for the period 15 July to 3 December 2004...