Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001479
Original file (20120001479.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  10 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001479 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  He states he did not receive the AGCM at the time of his discharge because he was not eligible.  He states he became aware of a change in policy while browsing a medals catalog, and he now wonders if the change was retroactive.

3.  He provides his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge), a page from a medals catalog, and correspondence between him and the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military record is not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at NPRC in 1973.  It is believed most of his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This case is being considered using the documents he provides and records in his reconstructed NPRC file.

3.  On 23 November 1944, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  On 31 July 1946, he was honorably discharged as a technical sergeant (the second-highest enlisted grade at the time) after completing 1 year, 8 months and 9 days of service.  The available records indicate he continued his service in the U.S. Army Reserve until he was honorably discharged on 31 July 1949.  

4.  His WD AGO Form 53-55 does not show he was awarded the AGCM.

5.  The available records are void of documentation showing he was convicted by court-martial.  

6.  The available records do not include his character or efficiency ratings.

7.  Army Regulation 600-68 (Good Conduct Medal), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, after 7 December 1941, for completion of 1 year of continuous active Federal military service while the United States was at war.  Consideration for award of the AGCM under the 
1-year policy required that the year be served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946.  The award would not be made to an enlisted man whose records, during the required period of service, disclosed a conviction by any court-martial, or to one whose character or efficiency was rated below “excellent.”  The fact that an enlisted man was entitled to an AGCM or clasp denoting a second or subsequent award of the AGCM would be noted under "remarks" of the [Report of Separation and] discharge certificate.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available records show the applicant completed 1 year of service qualifying for award of the AGCM prior to 2 March 1946, and there is no documentation showing he was convicted by court-martial.

2.  Although his character and efficiency ratings are not available for review, the evidence indicates his service was exemplary.  During his relatively brief period of active duty service he was promoted to the second-highest enlisted grade.  It is improbable that he would have been promoted to that grade if his character and efficiency were anything less than exemplary.  
3.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for his wartime service from 23 November 1944 to 31 July 1946 and to correct his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show this award.  


BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 23 November 1944 to 31 July 1946 and adding the award to his WD AGO Form 53-55.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001479





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001479



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016439

    Original file (20090016439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. Absent any derogatory information or unit commander disqualification on his WD AGO Form 53-55 or in his NPRC file, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of equity and justice to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 18 January 1943 through 1 November 1945, and to add this award to his WD AGO Form 53-55. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013274

    Original file (20110013274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the BSM is to be awarded to individuals who were authorized the CIB for service during WWII. The evidence also shows that during his tenure of assignment, the applicant’s unit received participation credit for the Ardennes-Alsace, Central Europe, and Rhineland campaigns of WWII and as a result, item 32 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected accordingly. As a result, there is insufficient evidence to support a correction of the record to show a 2nd award of the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009099

    Original file (20080009099.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 by deleting the current list of awards and replacing it with the entry "Bronze Star Medal 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award), Army Good Conduct Medal, American Defense Service Medal, American Campaign Medal, European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with 3...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002526

    Original file (20090002526.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence includes orders awarding the FSM the BSM 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) for heroism on 13 and 14 December 1944 in Germany, and a letter from the Commanding General, Army Service Forces, which confirmed the FSM's eligibility for the CMB and directed he be issued this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 by deleting the current list of awards and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002436

    Original file (20110002436.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her father's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Report and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show award of the: * Bronze Star Medal * European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars * Army Good Conduct Medal * American Campaign Medal * World War II (WWII) Victory Medal 2. The FSM served a qualifying period of service for award of the American Campaign Medal and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018064

    Original file (20090018064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) by adding the Purple Heart (PH), European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal (EAME), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and World War II Victory Medal; and by documenting his Prisoner of War (POW) status. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023653

    Original file (20100023653.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. An NPRC letter, dated 23 December 2009 shows that based on a review of the NPRC file pertaining to the applicant, the following awards were authorized for shipment to the applicant: * BSM * POW Medal * AGCM * ACM * EAME Campaign Medal with three bronze service stars * WWII Victory Medal * CIB * Honorable Service Lapel Button-WWII * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 8. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005420

    Original file (20130005420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military complete records are not available to the Board for review. His records contain an endorsement to his service record showing he was favorably considered for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and his character and efficiency were rated "excellent." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the BSM based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; b. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000536

    Original file (20090000536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge), dated 15 January 1946, be corrected to reflect his military occupational specialty (MOS) as machine gunner vice light truck driver and to include all awards he is entitled to based on his military service. The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003228

    Original file (20110003228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Military Qualification and Date) of the FSM’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was awarded the CIB. Therefore, the FSM is entitled to the Philippine Presidential Unit Citation and correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 the Distinguished Unit Badge and the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with 2 bronze...