Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001461
Original file (20120001461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  28 June 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001461 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) as "1."

2.  The applicant states he wants to enlist in the U.S. Navy but the recruiter said his RE code is wrong.  The RE code is supposed to be under 3, a 4, or an 8.  He originally enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and entered basic training but unfortunately he did not complete the training due to behavioral issues.  He had the wrong mind set and attitude and wants a second chance because the military can benefit him in a lot of ways.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the USAR on 28 July 2011 and entered active duty for training on 6 September 2011 at Fort Leonard Wood, MO. 

2.  Between 16 September and 6 October 2011, he was counseled on numerous occasions by various members of his chain of command on his disrespectful behavior to other trainees, failure to obey general orders/regulations, disregard for Army values, leaving Army equipment unsecured, and his insubordination toward an officer and noncommissioned officer.

3.  On 25 October 2011, the applicant was notified by his immediate commander of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, due to entry level status performance and conduct.  The unit commander cited the applicant's failure to adapt to the military and his lack of respect that showed he had no military bearing.  On 25 October 2011, he acknowledged receipt of the separation notification and indicated he did not want to remain in the Army.  

4.  On 25 October 2011, his immediate commander recommended the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, due to entry level status performance and conduct.  The unit commander cited the applicant's inability to adapt to the military lifestyle.  He further stated the applicant's disrespectful behavior and lack of discipline showed he had no military bearing.

5.  On 2 November 2011, the separation authority approved his discharge action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, for entry level performance and conduct and directed that he receive an uncharacterized discharge.  On 8 November 2011, he was discharged accordingly.

6.  The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized discharge.  Item 26 (Separation Code) of this form contains the entry "JGA" and Item 27 contains the entry "3."  He completed 2 months and 3 days of creditable active service.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 3 states a separation will be described as entry level with uncharacterized service if the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service at the time separation action is initiated.  Chapter 11 provides for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status. 

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states that the SPD code of "JGA" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, by reason of entry level performance and conduct.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE code of "3" will be assigned to members separated under these provisions with an SPD code of "JGA."

9.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the USAR.  Table 3-1 shows the RE codes and states in pertinent part:

	a.  RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.

	b.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted.

	c.  RE-4 applies to Soldiers separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, with an SPD of "JGA."  Based on this, he was appropriately assigned an RE code of "3" at the time of discharge.  An RE code of "3" is the correct code for Soldiers separated by reason of entry level performance and conduct.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  __x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case




are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001461





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001461



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022106

    Original file (20120022106.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) lists the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the corresponding SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It identifies SPD code JGA as the appropriate code to assign to enlisted Soldiers involuntarily released under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, for entry level performance and conduct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000308

    Original file (20120000308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JGA is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, entry level performance and conduct. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The available evidence shows the applicant had less than 180 days of creditable active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005608

    Original file (20110005608.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 September 2010, the applicant's unit commander notified him that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, for entry level status performance and conduct. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 11, by reason of entry level status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024260

    Original file (20110024260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 25 February 2010 and entered active duty for training on 19 April 2010. Table 3-1 shows the RE codes and states: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, with an SPD of "JGA."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021730

    Original file (20100021730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his reentry (RE) code from RE-3 to an RE-1 so he can reenter military service. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE-3 code will be assigned to members separated under these provisions with an SPD code of JGA. c. Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001632

    Original file (AR20130001632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. The Regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019524

    Original file (20140019524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that the SPD code "JGA" is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, by reason of entry level performance and conduct. His statements in regard to his request for changing his RE code are acknowledged. The evidence of record shows he was discharged on 8 November 2011 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, based on entry level performance and conduct.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005502

    Original file (AR20130005502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012133

    Original file (20120012133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 September 2011, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 11, by reason of entry-level performance and conduct. On 29 September 2011, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, by reason of entry-level performance and conduct,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004732

    Original file (AR20130004732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was released from active duty under the provision of Chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200 and the Board noted the applicant had completed 6 months and 4 days of continued active service at the time the separation action was initiated; thus he was no longer in an entry level status. Six negative counseling statements dated between 23 March 2011 and 14 June 2011, concerning his entry level separation, recommendation for separation, and his entry level separation processing. The...