Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001295
Original file (20120001295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001295 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his promotions be included on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states he received several promotions and but never received a final DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his 29 May 1982 DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 5 February 1982 and commenced his initial active duty for training (IADT) on 16 February 1982. 

3.  Upon completion of his IADT, he was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 75D (Personnel Records Specialist).

4.  On 29 May 1982, the applicant was released from active duty and returned to his USAR unit.  The DD Form 214 issued at this time shows his rank and pay grade as a private one, E-1.

5.  A DA Form 428 (Application for Identification Card), dated 14 June 1985, shows the applicant as a private two, E-2.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 and states:

	a.  the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge; and

	b.  a DD Form 214 is issued for USAR Soldiers completing IADT that results in the award of an MOS, even when the active duty period was less than 90 days.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The record does not contain and the applicant has not provided any evidence that he was advanced to a pay grade above E-1 while on active duty or that he had any active duty service warranting the issuance of a second DD Form 214.

2.  The only change of pay grade referenced in the applicant's record occurred three years after his release from active duty.

3.  Army Regulation 635-5 makes clear that a DD Form 214 is only issued at the end of a period of active duty. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001295



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001295



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071997C070403

    Original file (2002071997C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected to show her rank and grade as Private, E-2 (PV2). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001635

    Original file (20090001635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records further show she was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) on 14 May 1982. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 24 March 1982. Therefore, the termination date of her military service (6 years from the date she enlisted in the USAR) is correctly shown on her DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000050

    Original file (20110000050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his place of entry on active duty as Beckley, West Virginia, and his rank as specialist four, pay grade E-4. The applicant's DD Form 4/1, dated 20 January 1984, indicates that he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for 6 years in the rank of private, pay grade E-1. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows: a. he entered IADT on 23 January 1984 from Scottown, Ohio; b. he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015381

    Original file (20130015381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she was given an honorable separation from active duty, versus an uncharacterized separation, and she was separated in the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077511C070215

    Original file (2002077511C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In view of the facts of this case, the Board finds no evidence that shows any error or injustice related to the DD Form 214 in question or that would authorize the issue of a second separation document for a subsequent qualifying period of active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009631

    Original file (20080009631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to show a different social security number (SSN), mailing address, and rank. This Board action will be filed in his military records so that a record of the SSN he currently uses will be on hand. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021202

    Original file (20090021202.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6 instead of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 at the time of release from active duty. His record contains no evidence and he has failed to provide evidence showing he was promoted to the rank of SSG/E-6 during the period of active duty service covered by his DD Form 214. Evidence shows the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004909

    Original file (20130004909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 September 1992 be changed to show "honorable" service instead of "uncharacterized" service. The separation code on her DD Form 214 insinuates her service was questionable or negative and this most certainly was not the case. Paragraph 4-2h of Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided that Army National Guard of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009190

    Original file (20090009190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Bill benefits and that his Reserve drill attendance record should be corrected. There is no documentation to show the applicant was advanced beyond the rank of private during his period of IADT covered by the DD Form 214 issued on 8 May 1992 or that he served overseas during this period of active duty. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.